Suppr超能文献

伊利诺伊州库克县的含糖饮料税:失败的教训。

The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.

机构信息

Jamie F. Chriqui and Lisa M. Powell are with the Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, and the Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy (IHRP), University of Illinois at Chicago. At the time of this study, Christina N. Sansone was a visiting research specialist at IHRP.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640. Epub 2020 May 21.

Abstract

To describe the public health and policy lessons learned from the failure of the Cook County, Illinois, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT). This retrospective, mixed-methods, qualitative study involved key informant (KI) and discussion group interviews and document analysis including news media, court documents, testimony, letters, and press releases. Two coders used Atlas.ti v.8A to analyze 321 documents (from September 2016 through December 2017) and 6 KI and discussion group transcripts (from December 2017 through August 2018). Key lessons were (1) the SBT process needed to be treated as a political campaign, (2) there was inconsistent messaging regarding the tax purpose (i.e., revenue vs public health), (3) it was important to understand the local context and constraints, (4) there was implementation confusion, and (5) the media influenced an antitax backlash. The experience with the implementation and repeal of the Cook County SBT provides important lessons for future beverage tax efforts. Beverage taxation efforts need to be treated as political campaigns requiring strong coalitions, clear messaging, substantial resources, and work within the local context.

摘要

描述从伊利诺伊州库克县甜饮料税(SBT)失败中吸取的公共卫生和政策教训。这项回顾性、混合方法、定性研究包括关键知情者(KI)和小组讨论访谈以及文件分析,包括新闻媒体、法庭文件、证词、信件和新闻稿。两名编码员使用 Atlas.ti v.8A 分析了 321 份文件(2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 12 月)和 6 份 KI 和小组讨论记录(2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 8 月)。关键教训是:(1)SBT 进程需要被视为政治运动;(2)有关税收目的(即收入与公共卫生)的信息传递不一致;(3)了解当地背景和限制非常重要;(4)存在实施混乱;(5)媒体影响了反税反弹。实施和废除库克县 SBT 的经验为未来的饮料税工作提供了重要的经验教训。饮料税工作需要被视为政治运动,需要强大的联盟、明确的信息传递、大量资源以及在当地背景下开展工作。

相似文献

1
The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):390-397. doi: 10.7326/M19-2961. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
6
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1429-1437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
An Assessment of Food Store Compliance With the Cook County Sweetened Beverage Tax.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):E20-E23. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001017.
9
The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico.
Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1669122. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1669122.
10
Media Coverage and Framing of Oakland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax, 2016-2019.
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jun;35(5):698-702. doi: 10.1177/0890117120986104. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Are food taxes for healthy eating acceptable? A survey of public attitudes in the UK.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001731. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Design considerations for developing measures of policy implementation in quantitative evaluations of public health policy.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jul 15;4:1322702. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1322702. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Perceived Beverage Healthfulness, Tax Awareness, and Tax Opinions.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 May;56(5):321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
5
Framing and Themes of the City of Boulder's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Coverage in the Local News From 2016 to 2018.
AJPM Focus. 2023 Jan 20;2(2):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100068. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Advancing the science of policy implementation: a call to action for the implementation science field.
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):820-825. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad034.
8
The non-use of evidence in the adoption of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in OECD countries.
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):659-664. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad098.
9
Implementation of Indigenous Food Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation.
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Nov;23(1_suppl):76S-85S. doi: 10.1177/15248399221112964.
10
Low-income parents' perceptions of a sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia.
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Aug 22;11:e67. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.64. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
An Assessment of Food Store Compliance With the Cook County Sweetened Beverage Tax.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):E20-E23. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001017.
3
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Following in the footsteps of tobacco and alcohol? Stakeholder discourse in UK newspaper coverage of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Aug;22(12):2317-2328. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000739. Epub 2019 May 21.
6
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption 3 Years After the Berkeley, California, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):637-639. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304971. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
The palatability of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of the UK sugar debate.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207576. eCollection 2018.
10
The Short-Term Impacts of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Consumption.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验