• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于增强前和增强后T1WI以及T2 FLAIR减影特征,使用机器学习分类器区分治疗相关效应与胶质瘤复发:一项双中心研究

Differentiation of Treatment-Related Effects from Glioma Recurrence Using Machine Learning Classifiers Based Upon Pre-and Post-Contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR Subtraction Features: A Two-Center Study.

作者信息

Gao Xin-Yi, Wang Yi-Da, Wu Shi-Man, Rui Wen-Ting, Ma De-Ning, Duan Yi, Zhang An-Ni, Yao Zhen-Wei, Yang Guang, Yu Yan-Ping

机构信息

Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 May 7;12:3191-3201. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S244262. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S244262
PMID:32440216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7213892/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We propose three support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, using pre-and post-contrast T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) subtraction and/or pre-and post-contrast T1WI subtraction, to differentiate treatment-related effects (TRE) from glioma recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six postoperative high-grade glioma patients with suspicious progression after radiotherapy and chemotherapy from two centers were studied. Pre-and post-contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR were collected. Each pre-contrast image was voxel-wise subtracted from the co-registered post-contrast image. Dataset was randomly split into training, and testing on a 7:3 ratio, accordingly subjected to a five fold cross validation. Best feature subsets were selected by Pearson correlation coefficient and recursive feature elimination, whereupon a radiomics classifier was built with SVM. The discriminating performance was assessed with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

In all, 186 features were extracted on each subtraction map. Top nine T1WI subtraction features, top thirteen T2 FLAIR subtraction features and top thirteen combination features were selected to build optimal SVM classifiers accordingly. The accuracies/AUCs/sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of SVM based on sole T1WI subtraction were 80.00%/80.00% (CI: 0.5370-1.0000)/100%/70.00%/62.50%/100%. Those results of SVM based on sole T2 FLAIR subtraction were 86.67%/84.00% (CI: 0.5962-1.0000)/100%/80%/71.43%/100%. Those results of SVM based on both T1WI subtraction and T2 FLAIR subtraction were 93.33%/94.00% (CI: 0.7778-1.0000)/100%/90%/83.33%/100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pre- and post-contrast T2 FLAIR subtraction provided added value for diagnosis between recurrence and TRE. SVM based on a combination of T1WI and T2 FLAIR subtraction maps was superior to the sole use of T1WI or T2 FLAIR for differentiating TRE from recurrence. The SVM classifier based on combination of pre-and post-contrast subtraction T2 FLAIR and T1WI imaging allowed for the accurate differential diagnosis of TRE from recurrence, which is of paramount importance for treatment management of postoperative glioma patients after radiation therapy.

摘要

目的

我们提出了三种支持向量机(SVM)分类器,使用对比剂前和对比剂后T2液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)相减和/或对比剂前和对比剂后T1加权成像(T1WI)相减,以区分治疗相关效应(TRE)和胶质瘤复发。

材料与方法

研究了来自两个中心的56例术后高级别胶质瘤患者,这些患者在放化疗后有可疑进展。采集了对比剂前和对比剂后T1WI以及T2 FLAIR图像。将每个对比剂前图像与配准后的对比剂后图像进行逐体素相减。数据集按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和测试集,并进行五折交叉验证。通过Pearson相关系数和递归特征消除选择最佳特征子集,然后用支持向量机构建放射组学分类器。用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评估鉴别性能。

结果

每个相减图共提取186个特征。分别选择前九个T1WI相减特征、前十三个T2 FLAIR相减特征和前十三个组合特征来构建最佳支持向量机分类器。基于单独T1WI相减的支持向量机的准确率/AUC/敏感性/特异性/PPV/NPV分别为80.00%/80.00%(CI:0.5370 - 1.0000)/100%/70.00%/62.50%/100%。基于单独T2 FLAIR相减的支持向量机的这些结果分别为86.67%/84.00%(CI:0.5962 - 1.0000)/100%/80%/71.43%/100%。基于T1WI相减和T2 FLAIR相减两者的支持向量机的这些结果分别为93.33%/94.00%(CI:0.7778 - 1.0000)/100%/90%/83.33%/100%。

结论

对比剂前和对比剂后T2 FLAIR相减为复发和TRE的诊断提供了附加价值。基于T1WI和T2 FLAIR相减图组合的支持向量机在区分TRE和复发方面优于单独使用T1WI或T2 FLAIR。基于对比剂前和对比剂后相减T2 FLAIR与T1WI成像组合的支持向量机分类器能够准确鉴别TRE和复发,这对放疗后术后胶质瘤患者的治疗管理至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/c0f0c2ee4357/CMAR-12-3191-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/7c5ab4adba08/CMAR-12-3191-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/82448e630378/CMAR-12-3191-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/210d85af4705/CMAR-12-3191-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/ba3e54c40c95/CMAR-12-3191-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/27575fc89269/CMAR-12-3191-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/c0f0c2ee4357/CMAR-12-3191-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/7c5ab4adba08/CMAR-12-3191-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/82448e630378/CMAR-12-3191-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/210d85af4705/CMAR-12-3191-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/ba3e54c40c95/CMAR-12-3191-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/27575fc89269/CMAR-12-3191-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/7213892/c0f0c2ee4357/CMAR-12-3191-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Differentiation of Treatment-Related Effects from Glioma Recurrence Using Machine Learning Classifiers Based Upon Pre-and Post-Contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR Subtraction Features: A Two-Center Study.基于增强前和增强后T1WI以及T2 FLAIR减影特征,使用机器学习分类器区分治疗相关效应与胶质瘤复发:一项双中心研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 May 7;12:3191-3201. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S244262. eCollection 2020.
2
Evaluating Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Rearrangement Using Noninvasive Radiomics Biomarkers.使用非侵入性放射组学生物标志物评估实性肺腺癌间变性淋巴瘤激酶基因重排
Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Jul 16;13:6927-6935. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S257798. eCollection 2020.
3
Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.基于体素的多参数弥散张量成像在胶质瘤分级中的聚类成像。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Aug 7;5:396-407. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.001. eCollection 2014.
4
Predicting Histopathological Grading of Adult Gliomas Based On Preoperative Conventional Multimodal MRI Radiomics: A Machine Learning Model.基于术前常规多模态MRI影像组学预测成人胶质瘤的组织病理学分级:一种机器学习模型
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 5;13(6):912. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060912.
5
Imaging biomarker analysis of advanced multiparametric MRI for glioma grading.高级多参数 MRI 成像生物标志物分析在胶质瘤分级中的应用。
Phys Med. 2019 Apr;60:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
6
Noninvasive Prediction of IDH1 Mutation and ATRX Expression Loss in Low-Grade Gliomas Using Multiparametric MR Radiomic Features.使用多参数磁共振放射组学特征无创预测低级别胶质瘤中的 IDH1 突变和 ATRX 表达缺失。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):808-817. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26240. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
Radiomics analysis of T1WI and T2WI magnetic resonance images to differentiate between IgG4-related ophthalmic disease and orbital MALT lymphoma.基于 T1WI 和 T2WI 磁共振图像的影像组学分析鉴别 IgG4 相关眼病与眼眶黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03036-7.
8
Comparison of machine learning classifiers for differentiation of grade 1 from higher gradings in meningioma: A multicenter radiomics study.基于多中心影像组学研究的机器学习分类器在鉴别脑膜瘤 1 级与高级别脑膜瘤中的应用比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:244-249. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
9
Prediction of early recurrence of adult-type diffuse gliomas following radiotherapy using multi-modal magnetic resonance images.多模态磁共振成像预测成人弥漫性胶质瘤放疗后早期复发。
Med Phys. 2024 Nov;51(11):8638-8648. doi: 10.1002/mp.17382. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
10
Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics-based machine learning for disease progression in patients with high-grade glioma.基于磁共振成像放射组学的机器学习对高级别胶质瘤患者疾病进展的预测价值。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):224-236. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-459. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiomics for differentiating radiation-induced brain injury from recurrence in gliomas: systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodological quality evaluation using METRICS and RQS.用于鉴别胶质瘤放疗后脑损伤与复发的影像组学:使用METRICS和RQS的系统评价、Meta分析及方法学质量评估
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11401-x.
2
Radiomics: The New Promise for Differentiating Progression, Recurrence, Pseudoprogression, and Radionecrosis in Glioma and Glioblastoma Multiforme.放射组学:鉴别胶质瘤和多形性胶质母细胞瘤进展、复发、假性进展及放射性坏死的新希望
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 5;15(18):4429. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184429.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI in the evaluation of treatment response in glioma patients at 3T.多参数 MRI 在 3T 下评估胶质瘤患者治疗反应的诊断性能。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Apr;51(4):1154-1161. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26900. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Multicenter study demonstrates radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance perfusion images identify pseudoprogression in glioblastoma.多中心研究表明,基于磁共振灌注成像的放射组学特征可识别胶质母细胞瘤的假性进展。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 18;10(1):3170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11007-0.
3
Radiomics of Multiparametric MRI for Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Multimodality MRI Radiomics Based on Machine Learning for Identifying True Tumor Recurrence and Treatment-Related Effects in Patients with Postoperative Glioma.
基于机器学习的多模态MRI影像组学用于识别术后胶质瘤患者的真性肿瘤复发及治疗相关效应
Neurol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1729-1743. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00524-2. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomic Nomogram for the Early Differentiation of Recurrence and Pseudoprogression of High-Grade Glioma.基于多模态 MRI 的放射组学列线图用于高级别胶质瘤复发与假性进展的早期鉴别。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 30;2022:4667117. doi: 10.1155/2022/4667117. eCollection 2022.
5
Tumor Progression and Treatment-Related Changes: Radiological Diagnosis Challenges for the Evaluation of Post Treated Glioma.肿瘤进展及与治疗相关的变化:治疗后胶质瘤评估的放射学诊断挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;14(15):3771. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153771.
6
Machine learning imaging applications in the differentiation of true tumour progression from treatment-related effects in brain tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习成像在脑肿瘤中区分真性肿瘤进展与治疗相关效应的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep;66(6):781-797. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13436. Epub 2022 May 22.
7
Imaging Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Machine Learning Studies.胶质母细胞瘤治疗反应的影像学生物标志物:近期机器学习研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 31;12:799662. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.799662. eCollection 2022.
8
Research Progress of Gliomas in Machine Learning.机器学习中脑胶质瘤的研究进展。
Cells. 2021 Nov 15;10(11):3169. doi: 10.3390/cells10113169.
9
Longitudinal structural and perfusion MRI enhanced by machine learning outperforms standalone modalities and radiological expertise in high-grade glioma surveillance.基于机器学习的纵向结构和灌注 MRI 增强比单独的模态和放射学专业知识更能监测高级别胶质瘤。
Neuroradiology. 2021 Dec;63(12):2047-2056. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02719-6. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Subtraction Maps Derived from Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Glioma Facilitate Early Detection of Tumor Progression.源自胶质瘤患者纵向磁共振成像的减法图有助于肿瘤进展的早期检测。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 24;12(11):3111. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113111.
多参数 MRI 放射组学预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的价值:一项多中心研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 15;25(12):3538-3547. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3190. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Radiological diagnosis of brain radiation necrosis after cranial irradiation for brain tumor: a systematic review.脑肿瘤放疗后放射性脑坏死的放射学诊断:系统评价。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Feb 6;14(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1228-x.
5
Optimizing Texture Retrieving Model for Multimodal MR Image-Based Support Vector Machine for Classifying Glioma.优化基于多模态磁共振图像的支持向量机的纹理检索模型以分类脑胶质瘤。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 May;49(5):1263-1274. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26524. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Shape Features of the Lesion Habitat to Differentiate Brain Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression on Routine Multiparametric MRI: A Multisite Study.病灶形态特征有助于区分常规多参数 MRI 上脑肿瘤进展与假性进展:一项多中心研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;39(12):2187-2193. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5858. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
Machine learning: a useful radiological adjunct in determination of a newly diagnosed glioma's grade and IDH status.机器学习:一种用于确定新诊断的脑胶质瘤分级和 IDH 状态的有用的放射学辅助手段。
J Neurooncol. 2018 Sep;139(2):491-499. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2895-4. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
MRI features predict p53 status in lower-grade gliomas via a machine-learning approach.MRI 特征通过机器学习方法预测低级别胶质瘤中的 p53 状态。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Oct 29;17:306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.030. eCollection 2018.
9
Evaluation of Leptomeningeal Contrast Enhancement Using Pre-and Postcontrast Subtraction 3D-FLAIR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症中应用增强前、后减影 3D-FLAIR 成像评估软脑膜对比增强。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):642-647. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5541. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
C-MET PET/MRI for detection of recurrent glioma.C-MET PET/MRI 用于检测复发性脑胶质瘤。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Apr;45(4):593-601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3916-9. Epub 2017 Dec 28.