• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

53 个国家反兴奋剂组织预防举措评估:成就与局限。

An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations.

机构信息

Institute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, Austria.

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK94LA, UK.

出版信息

J Sport Health Sci. 2020 May;9(3):228-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.12.002
PMID:32444147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7242214/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One main purpose of the World Anti-Doping Agency was to harmonize anti-doping efforts, including the provision of anti-doping education. A multifaceted approach to doping prevention can play a key role in preventing intentional and unintentional doping. This article aimed to systematically record and evaluate doping prevention approaches in the form of information and education activities of national anti-doping organizations (NADOs) and assess the extent to which a multifaceted doping prevention approach has been realized.

METHODS

Data on anti-doping information and education activities of 53 NADOs were collected via a survey and an online search of the NADOs' websites. Prevention activities were classified into knowledge focused, affective focused, social skills, life skills, and ethic- and value- based. The implementation of the prevention activities was assessed by 4 independent raters using a modified visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

In total, 59% of the NADOs (n = 38) returned the survey and 70% (n = 45) had information available online. The data were combined for the visual analogue scale assessment. Overall, 58% of the NADOs (n = 37) reported offering activities including elements of all 5 approaches. Results of the raters' assessments indicated that the knowledge-focused approach was best implemented; the implementation of the other 4 approaches was largely unsatisfactory. The most common barriers to implementing doping prevention programs reported by the NADOs were lack of resources (n = 26) and difficulties in collaborating with sports organizations (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Results show a discrepancy between NADOs' self-report data and the implementation assessment. Even though the NADOs indicated otherwise, most of their education-based approaches did not address aspects of the visual analogue scale (e.g., resisting peer pressure) and only a few programs were ongoing. Possible explanations might be found in the reported barriers (e.g., financial). Concrete guidelines defining multifaceted, values-based education, and best practice examples should be developed to indicate how to include all 5 approaches in prevention.

摘要

背景

世界反兴奋剂机构的主要目的之一是协调反兴奋剂工作,包括提供反兴奋剂教育。多方面的兴奋剂预防方法可以在预防故意和无意使用兴奋剂方面发挥关键作用。本文旨在系统地记录和评估国家反兴奋剂组织(NADO)信息和教育活动形式的兴奋剂预防方法,并评估多方面兴奋剂预防方法的实施程度。

方法

通过调查和在线搜索 NADO 网站收集了 53 个 NADO 的反兴奋剂信息和教育活动数据。预防活动分为以知识为重点、以情感为重点、社会技能、生活技能和基于道德和价值观的活动。使用修改后的视觉模拟量表,由 4 名独立评估员评估预防活动的实施情况。

结果

共有 59%的 NADO(n=38)回复了调查,70%(n=45)在网上提供了信息。对视觉模拟量表评估进行了数据合并。总体而言,58%的 NADO(n=37)报告提供了包含所有 5 种方法要素的活动。评估员评估的结果表明,以知识为重点的方法实施得最好;其他 4 种方法的实施情况大多不尽如人意。NADO 报告的实施兴奋剂预防计划的最常见障碍是缺乏资源(n=26)和与体育组织合作困难(n=8)。

结论

结果显示 NADOs 的自我报告数据与实施评估之间存在差异。尽管 NADOs 表示并非如此,但他们的大多数基于教育的方法并未涉及视觉模拟量表的各个方面(例如,抵制同伴压力),并且只有少数方案在持续进行。可能的解释可以在报告的障碍中找到(例如,财务)。应制定具体的指导方针,定义多方面、基于价值观的教育,并提供最佳实践示例,以指示如何将所有 5 种方法纳入预防措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b2/7242214/2204f39467bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b2/7242214/93836e7caeb7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b2/7242214/2204f39467bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b2/7242214/93836e7caeb7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b2/7242214/2204f39467bf/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations.53 个国家反兴奋剂组织预防举措评估:成就与局限。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 May;9(3):228-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
2
Development of the role of national anti-doping organisations in the fight against doping: from past to future.国家反兴奋剂组织在反兴奋剂斗争中的角色发展:从过去到未来。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Dec 10;213(1-3):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
3
National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation.国家反兴奋剂预防指南:意图、效果及经验教训——一项为期4年的评估。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Oct 10;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9.
4
Peer Education strategies for promoting prevention of doping in different populations.促进不同人群预防使用兴奋剂的同伴教育策略。
Ann Ig. 2019 Nov-Dec;31(6):556-575. doi: 10.7416/ai.2019.2316.
5
An update on regulatory issues in antidoping programs in sport.体育反兴奋剂项目监管问题的最新情况。
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003 Aug;2(4):226-32. doi: 10.1249/00149619-200308000-00010.
6
Exploring the scope and applications of anti-doping measures in ultramarathon: an analysis of the positions of ultramarathon race organizers.探索超马拉松运动中反兴奋剂措施的范围及应用:超马拉松赛事组织者立场分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 22;6:1406638. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1406638. eCollection 2024.
7
The worldwide fight against doping: from the beginning to the World Anti-Doping Agency.全球反兴奋剂斗争:从起源到世界反兴奋剂机构。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010 Mar;39(1):1-9, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2009.10.009.
8
["Enjoy the Sport - Schools against doping and drug dependence": a health education intervention in secondary schools].["享受运动——学校反对兴奋剂和药物依赖”:一项针对中学的健康教育干预措施]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2019 Jul-Aug;75(4):271-282.
9
Harmonization of anti-doping rules in a global context (World Anti-Doping Agency-laboratory accreditation perspective).全球背景下反兴奋剂规则的协调统一(从世界反兴奋剂机构 - 实验室认证角度)
Bioanalysis. 2012 Jul;4(13):1603-11. doi: 10.4155/bio.12.152.
10
[Prevention of doping in sport in adolescents: evaluation of a health education based intervention].[青少年体育领域反兴奋剂:基于健康教育的干预措施评估]
Arch Pediatr. 1999 Aug;6(8):849-54. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)88478-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'selves' in doping and its psychosocial mechanisms: harmonised multi-country evidence from high-performing athletes in the UK, US, and China.使用兴奋剂行为中的“自我”及其社会心理机制:来自英国、美国和中国优秀运动员的多国协调证据
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Sep 2;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01304-x.
2
Context matters: athletes' perception of dopers' values, actions and vulnerabilities.背景很重要:运动员对兴奋剂使用者的价值观、行为及弱点的认知。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Dec 15;5:1229679. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1229679. eCollection 2023.
3
The association between subjective anti-doping knowledge and objective knowledge among Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of the Current Anti-doping Regime - A Quantitative Study Among German Top-Level Cyclists and Track and Field Athletes.对当前反兴奋剂制度的认知——一项针对德国顶级自行车运动员和田径运动员的定量研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 16;9:1890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01890. eCollection 2018.
2
Interprofessional education and distance education: A review and appraisal of the current literature.跨专业教育与远程教育:当前文献综述与评估
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):729-736. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
3
Intended or Unintended Doping? A Review of the Presence of Doping Substances in Dietary Supplements Used in Sports.
日本大学生运动员主观反兴奋剂知识与客观知识之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Nov 16;5:1210390. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1210390. eCollection 2023.
4
Health promoting sports federations: theoretical foundations and guidelines.促进健康的体育联合会:理论基础与指南。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 11;11:1147899. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147899. eCollection 2023.
5
Doping in Paralympic sport: perceptions, responsibility and anti-doping education experiences from the perspective of Paralympic athletes and parasport coaches.残奥会运动中的使用兴奋剂问题:从残奥会运动员和残疾人体育运动教练的角度看认知、责任及反兴奋剂教育经历
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 7;5:1166139. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1166139. eCollection 2023.
6
Recreational Athletes' Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances: Results from the First European Randomized Response Technique Survey.业余运动员使用提高成绩的物质:欧洲首次随机应答技术调查结果
Sports Med Open. 2023 Jan 8;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2.
7
Study of an Anti-Doping Education Program in Spanish Sports Sciences Students.西班牙体育科学专业学生反兴奋剂教育方案研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316324.
8
Answering the call for values-based anti-doping education-An evidence-informed intervention for elite adolescent athletes in Germany and Austria.响应基于价值观的反兴奋剂教育号召——一项针对德国和奥地利青少年精英运动员的循证干预措施。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Sep 23;4:859153. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.859153. eCollection 2022.
9
Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.世界反兴奋剂机构电子学习计划在反兴奋剂教育方面的成效,涉及中国大学生运动员和非运动员对兴奋剂的认知、显性和隐性态度以及使用兴奋剂的可能性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Apr 26;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1.
10
GRADE IT-A Literacy-Based Assessment Tool for via Athletes' Capability to Make the Right Decision.GRADE IT-A:一种基于读写能力的评估工具,用于评估运动员做出正确决策的能力。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 15;4:842192. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.842192. eCollection 2022.
有意或无意的兴奋剂?运动中使用的膳食补充剂中兴奋剂物质的存在情况综述。
Nutrients. 2017 Oct 4;9(10):1093. doi: 10.3390/nu9101093.
4
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys.随机反应调查评估的两项精英田径比赛中的兴奋剂使用情况。
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4.
5
Is unintentional doping real, or just an excuse?无意使用兴奋剂是真的存在,还是仅仅是一个借口?
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;53(15):978-979. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097614. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour of elite athletes: a meta-analytic review.精英运动员使用兴奋剂意图、易感性及行为的预测因素:一项元分析综述
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 11;5(1):1333. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3000-0. eCollection 2016.
7
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: A systematic review.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 May;57:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
What if it really was an accident? The psychology of unintentional doping.要是这真的是一场意外呢?无意使用兴奋剂的心理因素。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(15):898-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094678. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
Young athletes' awareness and monitoring of anti-doping in daily life: Does motivation matter?年轻运动员在日常生活中对反兴奋剂的认知与监测:动机重要吗?
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25(6):e655-63. doi: 10.1111/sms.12362. Epub 2014 Dec 2.