Griffith Derek M, Jaeger Emily Cornish, Bergner Erin M, Stallings Sarah, Wilkins Consuelo H
Center for Research on Men's Health, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB# 401814, Nashville, TN, 37240-1814, USA.
Center for Medicine, Health and Society, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB# 401814, Nashville, TN, 37240-1814, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2969-2975. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05868-1. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
Potential research participants, particularly those from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medical research, often decide to participate based on how they judge people, places, and study protocols as trustworthy. And yet, few studies have explored notions of trustworthiness or determinants of trustworthiness from the perspective of potential medical research participants.
This paper describes how racially and ethnically diverse potential medical research participants conceptualize what makes researchers, research settings, and research protocols seem trustworthy.
Using a criterion sampling strategy, we recruited African American, Latinx, and White adults for participation in focus groups conducted at a community center servings the Latinx community and at a health clinic that primarily serves the African American community.
A total of 57 African American, Latinx, and White adults APPROACH: We conducted seven focus groups that explored perceptions and determinants of research, trust, privacy, confidentiality, and research participation. We used a phenomenological thematic analytic approach to explore the determinants of trustworthiness to conduct medical research.
In our effort to identify the factors that affect potential research participants' perspectives on the trustworthiness of medical research, we found three themes: Who is trustworthy to conduct medical research? What influences perceptions of trustworthiness in medical research? And what institutions or settings are trustworthy to conduct medical research?
These findings highlight that one's willingness to participate in research is driven in part by their perception of the trustworthiness of researchers, research institutions, and the information they are given about potential research opportunities. There are important and modifiable determinants of trustworthiness that may facilitate minority participation in research. We found that research, researchers, and research institutions each have things that can be done to increase trustworthiness and minority participation in research.
潜在的研究参与者,尤其是那些在医学研究中代表性不足的种族和族裔群体,往往根据他们对人、地点和研究方案的可信度判断来决定是否参与。然而,很少有研究从潜在医学研究参与者的角度探讨可信度的概念或可信度的决定因素。
本文描述了不同种族和族裔的潜在医学研究参与者如何将使研究人员、研究环境和研究方案看起来可信的因素概念化。
我们采用标准抽样策略,招募了非裔美国人、拉丁裔和白人成年人,参与在一个为拉丁裔社区服务的社区中心和一个主要为非裔美国人社区服务的健康诊所进行的焦点小组讨论。
共有57名非裔美国人、拉丁裔和白人成年人
我们进行了七个焦点小组讨论,探讨了对研究、信任、隐私、保密和研究参与的看法及决定因素。我们采用现象学主题分析方法来探讨进行医学研究的可信度决定因素。
在我们努力确定影响潜在研究参与者对医学研究可信度看法的因素时,我们发现了三个主题:谁有资格进行医学研究?什么影响对医学研究可信度的看法?以及哪些机构或环境有资格进行医学研究?
这些发现突出表明,一个人参与研究的意愿部分取决于他们对研究人员、研究机构以及他们所获得的关于潜在研究机会的信息的可信度的看法。存在重要且可改变的可信度决定因素,可能会促进少数群体参与研究。我们发现,研究、研究人员和研究机构都可以采取措施来提高可信度和少数群体对研究的参与度。