• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格与局部脑结构:共同的遗传基础与可重复性。

Personality and local brain structure: Their shared genetic basis and reproducibility.

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany; Otto Hahn Research Group "Cognitive Neurogenetics", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117067. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117067. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117067
PMID:32574809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10251206/
Abstract

Local cortical architecture is highly heritable and distinct genes are associated with specific cortical regions. Total surface area has been shown to be genetically correlated with complex cognitive capacities, suggesting cortical brain structure is a viable endophenotype linking genes to behavior. However, to what extend local brain structure has a genetic association with cognitive and emotional functioning is incompletely understood. Here, we study the genetic correlation between personality traits and local cortical structure in a large-scale twin sample (Human Connectome Project, n ​= ​1102, 22-37y) and we evaluated whether observed associations reflect generalizable relationships between personality and local brain structure two independent age-matched samples (Brain Genomics Superstructure Project: n ​= ​925, age ​= ​19-35y, enhanced Nathan Kline Institute dataset: n ​= ​209, age: 19-39y). We found a genetic overlap between personality traits and local cortical structure in 10 of 18 observed phenotypic associations in predominantly frontal cortices. However, we only observed evidence in favor of replication for the negative association between surface area in medial prefrontal cortex and Neuroticism in both replication samples. Quantitative functional decoding indicated this region is implicated in emotional and socio-cognitive functional processes. In sum, our observations suggest that associations between local brain structure and personality are, in part, under genetic control. However, associations are weak and only the relation between frontal surface area and Neuroticism was consistently observed across three independent samples of young adults.

摘要

局部皮质结构具有高度遗传性,特定的基因与特定的皮质区域相关。总表面积与复杂认知能力存在遗传相关性,这表明皮质脑结构是将基因与行为联系起来的可行的内表型。然而,局部脑结构与认知和情绪功能的遗传关联程度尚不完全清楚。在这里,我们在一个大规模的双胞胎样本(人类连接组计划,n=1102,22-37 岁)中研究了人格特质与局部皮质结构之间的遗传相关性,我们评估了观察到的关联是否反映了人格与局部大脑结构之间普遍存在的关系在两个独立的年龄匹配样本中(大脑基因组超结构计划:n=925,年龄=19-35 岁,增强的 Nathan Kline 研究所数据集:n=209,年龄:19-39 岁)。我们发现,在观察到的 18 个表型关联中的 10 个中,人格特质与局部皮质结构之间存在遗传重叠,这些关联主要位于额叶皮质中。然而,我们只在两个复制样本中观察到了内侧前额叶皮质表面积与神经质之间负相关的复制证据。定量功能解码表明,该区域与情绪和社会认知功能过程有关。总之,我们的观察结果表明,局部脑结构与人格之间的关联在一定程度上受遗传控制。然而,关联很弱,只有前额表面积与神经质之间的关系在三个独立的年轻成年人样本中得到了一致观察。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/3a1a724df7e1/nihms-1903182-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/03b276cae469/nihms-1903182-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/fde9b41e0701/nihms-1903182-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/cb78c750513c/nihms-1903182-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/3a1a724df7e1/nihms-1903182-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/03b276cae469/nihms-1903182-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/fde9b41e0701/nihms-1903182-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/cb78c750513c/nihms-1903182-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3623/10251206/3a1a724df7e1/nihms-1903182-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Personality and local brain structure: Their shared genetic basis and reproducibility.人格与局部脑结构:共同的遗传基础与可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117067. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117067. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Behavioral, Anatomical and Heritable Convergence of Affect and Cognition in Superior Frontal Cortex.高级前额叶皮层中情感与认知的行为、解剖和遗传趋同。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov;243:118561. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118561. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
3
Analysis of alcohol use disorders from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample: Correlation of brain cortical thickness with neuroticism.来自内森·克莱因研究所-罗克兰样本的酒精使用障碍分析:大脑皮层厚度与神经质的相关性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jan 1;170:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Surface-based morphometry reveals the neuroanatomical basis of the five-factor model of personality.基于表面的形态测量学揭示了人格五因素模型的神经解剖学基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Apr 1;12(4):671-684. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw175.
5
The genetics of cortical myelination in young adults and its relationships to cerebral surface area, cortical thickness, and intelligence: A magnetic resonance imaging study of twins and families.年轻人皮质髓鞘形成的遗传学及其与大脑表面积、皮质厚度和智力的关系:双胞胎和家庭的磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116319. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Intra-cortical myelin mediates personality differences.皮质内髓鞘介导人格差异。
J Pers. 2019 Aug;87(4):889-902. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12442. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Cortical morphometry of the five-factor model of personality: findings from the Human Connectome Project full sample.人格五因素模型的皮质形态计量学:人类连接组计划全样本的发现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 17;14(4):381-395. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz017.
8
Borderline Personality Traits Are Not Correlated With Brain Structure in Two Large Samples.边缘型人格特质与两个大样本的大脑结构不相关。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jul;5(7):669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Personality traits and negative affect mediate the relationship between cortical thickness of superior frontal cortex and aggressive behavior.人格特质和负性情绪在额上回皮质厚度与攻击行为之间起中介作用。
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jan 23;718:134728. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134728. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
10
A Comprehensive Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Cerebral Surface Area in Youth.青少年大脑表面积的综合定量遗传学分析。
J Neurosci. 2019 Apr 17;39(16):3028-3040. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2248-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Directional Spatial and Spectral Attention Network (DSSA Net) for EEG-based emotion recognition.用于基于脑电图的情感识别的定向空间和频谱注意力网络(DSSA Net)
Front Neurorobot. 2025 Jan 7;18:1481746. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1481746. eCollection 2024.
2
Leveraging normative personality data and machine learning to examine the brain structure correlates of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits.利用规范性人格数据和机器学习来研究强迫型人格障碍特征的大脑结构相关性。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Nov;133(8):656-666. doi: 10.1037/abn0000919.
3
Trust toward humans and trust toward artificial intelligence are not associated: Initial insights from self-report and neurostructural brain imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
Empirical facts from search for replicable associations between cortical thickness and psychometric variables in healthy adults.健康成年人中皮质厚度与心理计量变量之间可复制关联的实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 2;12(1):13286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17556-7.
2
Little evidence for associations between the Big Five personality traits and variability in brain gray or white matter.大五人格特质与大脑灰质或白质变异性之间的关联证据不足。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117092. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117092. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
Influence of Processing Pipeline on Cortical Thickness Measurement.
对人类的信任与对人工智能的信任并无关联:来自自我报告和神经结构脑成像的初步见解。
Personal Neurosci. 2023 Mar 21;6:e3. doi: 10.1017/pen.2022.5. eCollection 2023.
4
Neurocircuitry of Personality Traits and Intent in Decision-Making.决策中人格特质与意图的神经回路
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;13(5):351. doi: 10.3390/bs13050351.
5
Premorbid Personality Traits as Risk Factors for Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review of a Vulnerability Hypothesis.病前人格特质作为行为成瘾的危险因素:对一种易感性假设的系统评价
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):467. doi: 10.3390/children10030467.
6
Personality Neuroscience: An Emerging Field with Bright Prospects.人格神经科学:一个前景光明的新兴领域。
Personal Sci. 2022;3. doi: 10.5964/ps.7269. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
7
"Nothing to see here": No structural brain differences as a function of the personality traits from a systematic review and meta-analysis.“此处无异常”:系统评价与荟萃分析表明,大脑结构不存在因人格特质而异的差异。
Personal Neurosci. 2022 Aug 9;5:e8. doi: 10.1017/pen.2021.5. eCollection 2022.
8
Linking interindividual variability in brain structure to behaviour.将大脑结构的个体间差异与行为联系起来。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 May;23(5):307-318. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00584-7. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
The association between local brain structure and disgust propensity.局部脑结构与厌恶倾向的关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):1327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05407-4.
10
Behavioral, Anatomical and Heritable Convergence of Affect and Cognition in Superior Frontal Cortex.高级前额叶皮层中情感与认知的行为、解剖和遗传趋同。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov;243:118561. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118561. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
处理流水线对皮质厚度测量的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jul 30;30(9):5014-5027. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa097.
4
Somatosensory-Motor Dysconnectivity Spans Multiple Transdiagnostic Dimensions of Psychopathology.躯体感觉运动连通性跨越精神病理学的多个跨诊断维度。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 15;86(10):779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Interfacing neural constructs with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology: 'Why' and 'how'.与精神病理学层级分类法进行神经构建体连接:“为何”与“如何”。
Personal Ment Health. 2020 Feb;14(1):106-122. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1460. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations.非西方文化人群中“大五”人格特质的测量难题。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 10;5(7):eaaw5226. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5226. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Genetic contribution to the phenotypic correlation between trait impulsivity and resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala and its subregions.遗传对特质冲动性和杏仁核及其亚区静息状态功能连接之间表型相关性的贡献。
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 1;201:115997. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
8
Empirical examination of the replicability of associations between brain structure and psychological variables.经验检验脑结构与心理变量之间关联的可重复性。
Elife. 2019 Mar 13;8:e43464. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43464.
9
Cortical morphometry of the five-factor model of personality: findings from the Human Connectome Project full sample.人格五因素模型的皮质形态计量学:人类连接组计划全样本的发现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 17;14(4):381-395. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz017.
10
Personality traits are related with dynamic functional connectivity in major depression disorder: A resting-state analysis.人格特质与重性抑郁障碍的动态功能连接相关:一项静息态研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:1032-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 2.