Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
LeadingAge LTSS Center @UMass Boston, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1273-1284. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1783043. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Extensive literature has documented the experiences of informal caregivers and their interactions with formal care providers, yet this research is almost entirely limited to caregivers who live near their care-recipients. This study aims to describe long-distance caregivers' (LDC) experiences (e.g., satisfaction and challenges) with formal care providers. Subgroup differences were examined based on the care-recipient's (CR) dementia status and residential setting (community versus residential care).
Data were collected from 296 LDCs ( = 56.64, = 12.40) categorized into four subgroups based on CR dementia status and residential setting. Participants rated their overall satisfaction, satisfaction with communication and information, and described challenges faced in their interactions with formal care providers.
Challenges related to formal care providers were significantly greater and satisfaction significantly lower among LDCs of CRs in residential care, irrespective of dementia status, when compared to LDCs of CRs in the community.
This study provides insights into the experiences of a growing segment of the caregiver population managing care from a distance, specifically in their interactions with formal care providers.
The results of this study point to the possible necessity for the development of novel interventions to improve and enhance communication and collaboration between FCPs and informal caregivers.
大量文献记录了非正式照顾者的经历及其与正式照顾提供者的互动,但这些研究几乎完全局限于居住在照顾对象附近的照顾者。本研究旨在描述远距离照顾者(LDC)与正式照顾提供者的互动体验(例如满意度和挑战)。根据照顾对象(CR)的痴呆症状况和居住环境(社区与养老院),检查了亚组差异。
根据 CR 痴呆症状况和居住环境,将 296 名 LDC 分为四个亚组,收集了他们的数据(=56.64,=12.40)。参与者评估了他们与正式照顾提供者互动的整体满意度、沟通和信息满意度以及面临的挑战。
与居住在养老院的 CR 相比,无论痴呆症状况如何,居住在养老院的 CR 的 LDC 与正式照顾提供者的互动中面临的挑战明显更大,满意度明显更低。
本研究深入了解了越来越多的远距离照顾者群体的经历,特别是他们与正式照顾提供者的互动。
本研究结果表明,可能需要开发新的干预措施,以改善和加强 FCP 和非正式照顾者之间的沟通和协作。