• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-Distance Caregivers: What are Their Experiences with Formal Care Providers?长途照护者:他们与正式照护提供者的相处经历如何?
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1273-1284. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1783043. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
3
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
4
Rural and remote dementia care challenges and needs: perspectives of formal and informal care providers residing in Saskatchewan, Canada.农村和偏远地区痴呆症护理的挑战与需求:加拿大萨斯喀彻温省正规和非正规护理提供者的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2747. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Exploring the associations between competence in dementia care and work attitudes among formal caregivers in nursing homes.探讨养老院正式照护者在痴呆症护理方面的能力与工作态度之间的关联。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Dec;33(12):4735-4747. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17157. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Use of Home Care Services Reduces Care-Related Strain in Long-Distance Caregivers.使用家庭护理服务可减少长途护理者的护理相关压力。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):252-261. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab088.
7
The experiences, priorities, and perceptions of informal caregivers of people with dementia in nursing homes: A scoping review.养老院痴呆症患者的非正式照护者的体验、优先事项和看法:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2746-2765. doi: 10.1177/14713012211012606. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
8
Caregiver-provider communication about pain in persons with dementia.照顾者与痴呆症患者关于疼痛的沟通。
Dementia (London). 2022 Jan;21(1):270-286. doi: 10.1177/14713012211036868. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Social Interactions between Family and Community-Based Service Providers in Dementia Caregiving.痴呆症照料中的家庭与社区服务提供者之间的社会互动。
Clin Gerontol. 2021 Jul-Sep;44(4):482-493. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1765932. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
Health information management practices in informal caregiving: An artifacts analysis and implications for IT design.非正规照护中的健康信息管理实践:人工制品分析及其对 IT 设计的启示。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention to Support Long-Distance Family Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.一项支持老年痴呆症患者远程家庭照料者的干预措施的可行性和初步疗效
Clin Gerontol. 2025 Feb 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2025.2464869.
2
Facilitators, barriers and impacts to implementing dementia care training for staff in long-term care settings by using fully immersive virtual reality: a scoping review protocol.使用全沉浸式虚拟现实为长期护理环境中的员工实施痴呆症护理培训的促进因素、障碍和影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 8;14(5):e083724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083724.
3
Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers' quality of life.在提供支持的同时生活得好:用于评估非正式照护者生活质量的 LTCQ-Carer 的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3507-3520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
4
Telecaregiving for Dementia: A Mapping Review of Technological and Nontechnological Interventions.远程照护痴呆症:技术和非技术干预措施的映射综述。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jan 1;64(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad026.
5
Close but Not Close Enough: How Distance Caregiving is Associated with Hospice Family Caregiver Hospice Communication Experiences.近在咫尺却又不够近:远程照护与临终关怀家庭照护者的临终关怀沟通体验之间的关联
Health Commun. 2024 Mar;39(3):482-492. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2170199. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
6
Enhancing Long Term Care and Caregiving.加强长期护理与照护服务。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1055-1057. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2110754. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Use of Home Care Services Reduces Care-Related Strain in Long-Distance Caregivers.使用家庭护理服务可减少长途护理者的护理相关压力。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):252-261. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab088.

本文引用的文献

1
Nothing Informal About Family Caregiving.家庭照料绝非小事。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):470. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6732.
2
Dementia as a predictor of care-related quality of life in informal caregivers: a cross-sectional study to investigate differences in health-related outcomes between dementia and non-dementia caregivers.痴呆症作为非正规照护者护理相关生活质量的预测指标:一项横断面研究,旨在调查痴呆症和非痴呆症照护者之间健康相关结局的差异。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0885-1.
3
Exploring the collaboration between formal and informal care from the professional perspective-A thematic synthesis.从专业视角探索正式照护与非正式照护之间的合作——一项主题综合研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):474-485. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12503. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Family Involvement in the Nursing Home and Perceived Resident Quality of Life.家庭参与养老院和居民感知生活质量。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1033-1043. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx108.
5
Supporting Family Involvement in Long-Term Residential Care: Promising Practices for Relational Care.支持家庭参与长期居住护理:关系护理的可行实践。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jan;28(1):60-72. doi: 10.1177/1049732317730568. Epub 2017 Sep 16.
6
Recent global trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia, and survival with dementia.痴呆症患病率、发病率及痴呆症患者生存率的近期全球趋势。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Jul 30;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0188-8.
7
A National Profile of Family and Unpaid Caregivers Who Assist Older Adults With Health Care Activities.协助老年人进行医疗保健活动的家庭及无薪照料者的全国概况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):372-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7664.
8
Unmet needs of caregivers of individuals referred to a dementia care program.转介至痴呆症护理项目的患者的照料者未被满足的需求。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):282-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13251.
9
Dementia care: intersecting informal family care and formal care systems.痴呆症护理:非正式家庭护理与正式护理系统的交叉
J Aging Res. 2014;2014:486521. doi: 10.1155/2014/486521. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
10
Family caregiver learning--how family caregivers learn to provide care at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis of four datasets.家庭护理人员学习——家庭护理人员如何在生命末期学习提供护理:对四个数据集的定性二次分析。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):657-64. doi: 10.1177/0269216313487765. Epub 2013 May 21.

长途照护者:他们与正式照护提供者的相处经历如何?

Long-Distance Caregivers: What are Their Experiences with Formal Care Providers?

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

LeadingAge LTSS Center @UMass Boston, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1273-1284. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1783043. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1080/07317115.2020.1783043
PMID:32589110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7762738/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Extensive literature has documented the experiences of informal caregivers and their interactions with formal care providers, yet this research is almost entirely limited to caregivers who live near their care-recipients. This study aims to describe long-distance caregivers' (LDC) experiences (e.g., satisfaction and challenges) with formal care providers. Subgroup differences were examined based on the care-recipient's (CR) dementia status and residential setting (community versus residential care).

METHODS

Data were collected from 296 LDCs ( = 56.64, = 12.40) categorized into four subgroups based on CR dementia status and residential setting. Participants rated their overall satisfaction, satisfaction with communication and information, and described challenges faced in their interactions with formal care providers.

RESULTS

Challenges related to formal care providers were significantly greater and satisfaction significantly lower among LDCs of CRs in residential care, irrespective of dementia status, when compared to LDCs of CRs in the community.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the experiences of a growing segment of the caregiver population managing care from a distance, specifically in their interactions with formal care providers.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study point to the possible necessity for the development of novel interventions to improve and enhance communication and collaboration between FCPs and informal caregivers.

摘要

目的

大量文献记录了非正式照顾者的经历及其与正式照顾提供者的互动,但这些研究几乎完全局限于居住在照顾对象附近的照顾者。本研究旨在描述远距离照顾者(LDC)与正式照顾提供者的互动体验(例如满意度和挑战)。根据照顾对象(CR)的痴呆症状况和居住环境(社区与养老院),检查了亚组差异。

方法

根据 CR 痴呆症状况和居住环境,将 296 名 LDC 分为四个亚组,收集了他们的数据(=56.64,=12.40)。参与者评估了他们与正式照顾提供者互动的整体满意度、沟通和信息满意度以及面临的挑战。

结果

与居住在养老院的 CR 相比,无论痴呆症状况如何,居住在养老院的 CR 的 LDC 与正式照顾提供者的互动中面临的挑战明显更大,满意度明显更低。

结论

本研究深入了解了越来越多的远距离照顾者群体的经历,特别是他们与正式照顾提供者的互动。

临床意义

本研究结果表明,可能需要开发新的干预措施,以改善和加强 FCP 和非正式照顾者之间的沟通和协作。