Zhang Yi
Singapore 3D-Printing Center, HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Int J Bioprint. 2019 Jul 3;5(2):192. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.192. eCollection 2019.
As microfluidic devices are designed to tackle more intricate tasks, the architecture of microfluidic devices becomes more complex, and more sophisticated fabrication techniques are in demand. Therefore, it is sensible to fabricate microfluidic devices by three-dimensional (3D)-printing, which is well-recognized for its unique ability to monolithically fabricate complex structures using a near-net-shape additive manufacturing process. Many 3D-printed microfluidic platforms have been demonstrated but can 3D-printed microfluidics meet the demanding requirements in today's context, and has microfluidics truly benefited from 3D-printing? In contrast to 3D-printed microfluidics, some go the other way around and exploit microfluidics for 3D-printing. Many innovative printing strategies have been made possible with microfluidics-enabled 3D-printing, although the limitations are also largely evident. In this perspective article, we take a look at the current development in 3D-printed microfluidics and microfluidics-enabled 3D printing with a strong focus on the limitations of the two technologies. More importantly, we attempt to identify the innovations required to overcome these limitations and to develop new high-value applications that would make a scientific and social impact in the future.
随着微流控设备旨在处理更复杂的任务,微流控设备的架构变得更加复杂,因此需要更先进的制造技术。因此,采用三维(3D)打印来制造微流控设备是明智的,3D打印以其独特的能力而闻名,即能够使用近净形增材制造工艺整体制造复杂结构。许多3D打印的微流控平台已经得到展示,但在当今背景下,3D打印的微流控技术能否满足苛刻的要求,微流控技术是否真的从3D打印中受益?与3D打印的微流控技术相反,一些人则反其道而行之,利用微流控技术进行3D打印。借助微流控技术实现的3D打印已经实现了许多创新的打印策略,尽管其局限性也非常明显。在这篇观点文章中,我们审视了3D打印微流控技术和微流控技术实现的3D打印的当前发展,重点关注这两种技术的局限性。更重要的是,我们试图确定克服这些局限性所需的创新,并开发未来将产生科学和社会影响的新的高价值应用。