Suppr超能文献

关于开具物理干预措施的不同方法的讨论——条条大路通罗马,但我们该选哪一条?

A Discussion on Different Approaches for Prescribing Physical Interventions - Four Roads Lead to Rome, but Which One Should We Choose?

作者信息

Herold Fabian, Törpel Alexander, Hamacher Dennis, Budde Henning, Gronwald Thomas

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.

Research Group Neuroprotection, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2020 Jun 27;10(3):55. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030055.

Abstract

It is well recognized that regular physical exercise has positive effects on physical and mental health. To use the beneficial health effects of physical exercise, there are worldwide movements encouraging health care providers to include physical exercise in their care and treatments strategies. However, a crucial point in administering the "exercise polypill" is the dosing and, in turn, the prescription of the physical intervention (PI). In this perspective article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to prescribe PI. In this context, we also highlight outstanding questions and potential areas of opportunity for further investigations.

摘要

人们普遍认识到,定期体育锻炼对身心健康有积极影响。为了利用体育锻炼对健康的有益影响,全球都在开展相关运动,鼓励医疗保健提供者将体育锻炼纳入其护理和治疗策略中。然而,实施“运动复方制剂”的一个关键点是剂量,进而涉及体育干预(PI)的处方。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了不同PI处方方法的优缺点。在此背景下,我们还强调了突出问题以及进一步研究的潜在机会领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/7565695/e7a9d87e2eb5/jpm-10-00055-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验