Suppr超能文献

用于人类消费的兔子致昏方法及屠宰方式。

Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption.

作者信息

Saxmose Nielsen Søren, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Depner Klaus, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt Christian, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Roberts Helen Clare, Sihvonen Liisa Helena, Stahl Karl, Velarde Calvo Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Candiani Denise, Fabris Chiara, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Van der Stede Yves, Spoolder Hans

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Jan 9;18(1):e05927. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5927. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

This opinion on the killing of rabbits for human consumption ('slaughtering') responds to two mandates: one from the European Parliament (EP) and the other from the European Commission. The opinion describes stunning methods for rabbits known to the experts in the EFSA working group, which can be used in commercial practice, and which are sufficiently described in scientific and technical literature for the development of an opinion. These are electrical stunning, mechanical stunning with a penetrative and non-penetrative captive bolt and gas stunning. The latter method is not allowed in the EU anymore following Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009, but may still be practiced elsewhere in the world. Related hazards and welfare consequences are also evaluated. To monitor stunning effectiveness as requested by the EP mandate, the opinion suggests the use of indicators for the state of consciousness, selected on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity and ease of use. Similarly, it suggests indicators to confirm animals are dead before dressing. For the European Commission mandate, slaughter processes were assessed from the arrival of rabbits in containers until their death, and grouped in three main phases: pre-stunning (including arrival, unloading of containers from the truck, lairage, handling/removing of rabbits from containers), stunning (including restraint) and bleeding (including bleeding following stunning and bleeding during slaughter without stunning). Ten welfare consequences resulting from the hazards that rabbits can be exposed to during slaughter are identified: consciousness, animal not dead, thermal stress (heat or cold stress), prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, restriction of movements, pain, fear, distress and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal-based measures (indicators) are described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, indicators, origins, preventive and corrective measures are developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are also proposed.

摘要

这份关于为人类消费而宰杀兔子(“屠宰”)的意见回应了两项要求:一项来自欧洲议会(EP),另一项来自欧盟委员会。该意见描述了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)工作组专家所熟知的兔子致昏方法,这些方法可用于商业实践,并且在科学技术文献中有充分描述,以便形成一份意见。这些方法包括电击致昏、使用穿透式和非穿透式栓击器的机械致昏以及气体致昏。根据欧盟理事会第1099/2009号条例(EC),后一种方法在欧盟已不再允许使用,但在世界其他地方仍可能使用。还评估了相关危害和福利后果。为按照欧洲议会要求监测致昏效果,该意见建议使用基于敏感性、特异性和易用性选择的意识状态指标。同样,它还建议使用指标来确认动物在放血前已死亡。对于欧盟委员会的要求,评估了从兔子装在容器中到达直至其死亡的屠宰过程,并将其分为三个主要阶段:致昏前(包括到达、从卡车上卸下容器、圈养、从容器中处理/取出兔子)、致昏(包括约束)和放血(包括致昏后的放血以及无致昏情况下屠宰期间的放血)。确定了兔子在屠宰过程中可能面临的危害所导致的十种福利后果:意识、动物未死亡、热应激(热或冷应激)、长期口渴、长期饥饿、活动受限、疼痛、恐惧、痛苦和呼吸窘迫。描述了福利后果和相关的基于动物的措施(指标)。为每个过程编制了将危害、福利后果、指标、来源、预防和纠正措施联系起来的结果表。还提出了将福利后果降至最低的缓解措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/7008888/78768c8d40ab/EFS2-18-e05927-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验