Coughlan Christina, Bruce Kimberley D, Burgy Olivier, Boyd Timothy D, Michel Cole R, Garcia-Perez Josselyn E, Adame Vanesa, Anton Paige, Bettcher Brianne M, Chial Heidi J, Königshoff Melanie, Hsieh Elena W Y, Graner Michael, Potter Huntington
University of Colorado Alzheimer's and Cognition Center, Department of Neurology, Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2020 Sep;88(1):e110. doi: 10.1002/cpcb.110.
Exosomes are 50- to 150-nm-diameter extracellular vesicles secreted by all mammalian cells except mature red blood cells and contribute to diverse physiological and pathological functions within the body. Many methods have been used to isolate and analyze exosomes, resulting in inconsistencies across experiments and raising questions about how to compare results obtained using different approaches. Questions have also been raised regarding the purity of the various preparations with regard to the sizes and types of vesicles and to the presence of lipoproteins. Thus, investigators often find it challenging to identify the optimal exosome isolation protocol for their experimental needs. Our laboratories have compared ultracentrifugation and commercial precipitation- and column-based exosome isolation kits for exosome preparation. Here, we present protocols for exosome isolation using two of the most commonly used methods, ultracentrifugation and precipitation, followed by downstream analyses. We use NanoSight nanoparticle tracking analysis and flow cytometry (Cytek ) to determine exosome concentrations and sizes. Imaging flow cytometry can be utilized to both size exosomes and immunophenotype surface markers on exosomes (ImageStream ). High-performance liquid chromatography followed by nano-flow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) of the exosome fractions can be used to determine the presence of lipoproteins, with LCMS able to provide a proteomic profile of the exosome preparations. We found that the precipitation method was six times faster and resulted in a ∼2.5-fold higher concentration of exosomes per milliliter compared to ultracentrifugation. Both methods yielded extracellular vesicles in the size range of exosomes, and both preparations included apoproteins. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Pre-analytic fluid collection and processing Basic Protocol 2: Exosome isolation by ultracentrifugation Alternate Protocol 1: Exosome isolation by precipitation Basic Protocol 3: Analysis of exosomes by NanoSight nanoparticle tracking analysis Alternate Protocol 2: Analysis of exosomes by flow cytometry and imaging flow cytometry Basic Protocol 4: Downstream analysis of exosomes using high-performance liquid chromatography Basic Protocol 5: Downstream analysis of the exosome proteome using nano-flow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
外泌体是直径为50至150纳米的细胞外囊泡,由除成熟红细胞外的所有哺乳动物细胞分泌,并在体内发挥多种生理和病理功能。人们已采用多种方法来分离和分析外泌体,这导致各实验结果不一致,引发了关于如何比较不同方法所得结果的问题。关于各种制剂在囊泡大小和类型以及脂蛋白存在方面的纯度也存在疑问。因此,研究人员常常发现为满足其实验需求确定最佳的外泌体分离方案具有挑战性。我们实验室比较了超速离心法与基于商业沉淀和柱分离的外泌体分离试剂盒来制备外泌体。在此,我们介绍使用两种最常用方法(超速离心和沉淀)进行外泌体分离的方案,以及后续分析方法。我们使用纳米可视纳米颗粒跟踪分析和流式细胞术(Cytek)来确定外泌体的浓度和大小。成像流式细胞术可用于对外泌体进行大小测定和对外泌体表面标志物进行免疫表型分析(ImageStream)。外泌体组分的高效液相色谱随后进行纳流液相色谱 - 质谱联用(LCMS)可用于确定脂蛋白的存在,LCMS能够提供外泌体制剂的蛋白质组图谱。我们发现,与超速离心相比,沉淀法快6倍,每毫升外泌体浓度高出约2.5倍。两种方法均产生了外泌体大小范围内的细胞外囊泡,且两种制剂均包含载脂蛋白。©2020威利期刊有限责任公司。基本方案1:分析前体液采集和处理 基本方案2:通过超速离心分离外泌体 替代方案1:通过沉淀分离外泌体 基本方案3:通过纳米可视纳米颗粒跟踪分析对外泌体进行分析 替代方案2:通过流式细胞术和成像流式细胞术对外泌体进行分析 基本方案4:使用高效液相色谱对外泌体进行下游分析 基本方案5:使用纳流液相色谱 - 质谱联用对外泌体蛋白质组进行下游分析