Department of Ophthalmology, LongHua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Qingpu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;40(12):3223-3232. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01505-2. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
To investigate the reliability of using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to measure the lower lid margin thickness (LLMT) from the posterior lash line to the Marx's line by comparing with a vernier micrometer.
This was a prospective, single-center, diagnostic test study. Sixty volunteers aged between 20 and 79 without ocular diseases were recruited. A vernier micrometer and AS-OCT were, respectively, used to measure the same lid margin thickness at the central lower lid.
The mean age of volunteers was 39.1 ± 13.7 years. The LLMT in 60 subjects (25 males and 35 females) measured by a vernier micrometer and AS-OCT was 1.03 ± 0.25 mm and 0.82 ± 0.21 mm, respectively. There was a significant difference between two measurements (P < 0.001). In addition, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was engaged to evaluate the reliability and agreement of two measurements (ICC = 0.83). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 57 of 60 spots were within 95% limits of agreement. No adverse events were detected in all subjects after the measurements.
Although the LLMT measured by AS-OCT was less than that measured by a vernier micrometer, AS-OCT providing quantitative measurements and imaging data was also seemed to be a reliable method with a good agreement. It could be a substitute for a vernier micrometer in clinical practice in the future.
通过与游标卡尺比较,研究从前部眼相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)测量后睫线至 Marx 线的下眼睑缘厚度(LLMT)的可靠性。
这是一项前瞻性、单中心、诊断性测试研究。招募了 60 名年龄在 20 至 79 岁之间、无眼部疾病的志愿者。分别使用游标卡尺和 AS-OCT 测量同一下眼睑中部的缘厚度。
志愿者的平均年龄为 39.1±13.7 岁。60 名受试者(25 名男性和 35 名女性)的下眼睑缘厚度经游标卡尺和 AS-OCT 测量分别为 1.03±0.25mm 和 0.82±0.21mm,两者之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。此外,采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估两种测量方法的可靠性和一致性(ICC=0.83)。Bland-Altman 图表明,60 个点中有 57 个点在 95%一致性限内。所有受试者在测量后均未出现不良事件。
尽管 AS-OCT 测量的 LLMT 小于游标卡尺测量的 LLMT,但 AS-OCT 提供定量测量和成像数据,似乎也是一种具有良好一致性的可靠方法。它将来可能成为临床实践中游标卡尺的替代品。