Garofalo Gioacchino, Mussi Davide R, Riggio Lucia
Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma1.
School of Psychology, University of Reading Malaysia2.
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Feb 1;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.5709/acp-0281-8. eCollection 2020.
In stimulus-response compatibility tasks, performance is better when the handle of an object is oriented on the same side of the response than when the handle is oriented on the opposite side. Two major alternative accounts, the motor affordance and spatial accounts, have been proposed to explain this handle-hand compatibility effect. In two experiments, we tested between these two accounts by administering a go/no-go task to right-handed participants. Handled objects presented on a touchscreen were used as stimuli. Half of the participants had to reach-to-touch the stimuli by using their dominant hand, the other half by using their nondominant hand. Liftoff times (LTs), movement times (MTs) and spatial coordinates of the movement endpoints were recorded. Results from the LTs and MTs analyses showed no evidence of handle-hand compatibility effects. In contrast, the analyses of the spatial coordinates revealed that participants' touches were shifted more laterally towards the handle when the handles were oriented on the same side of the responding hand (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, the right-hand touches landed higher (towards the handle) than the left-hand touches, especially when the vertical object dimension was particularly salient (Experiment 1). Overall, these results are in line with the activation of hand motor programs to reach and grasp the object as predicted by the motor account, at least for the right/dominant hand.
在刺激-反应兼容性任务中,当物体的把手朝向与反应的同一侧时,表现要优于把手朝向与反应相反侧时。已经提出了两种主要的替代解释,即运动可供性解释和空间解释,来阐释这种把手-手部兼容性效应。在两项实验中,我们通过对右利手参与者进行一项“是/否”任务,对这两种解释进行了检验。呈现于触摸屏上的有把手物体被用作刺激物。一半参与者必须用优势手去触摸刺激物,另一半则用非优势手。记录了起始时间(LTs)、运动时间(MTs)以及运动终点的空间坐标。对起始时间和运动时间的分析结果未显示出把手-手部兼容性效应的证据。相比之下,对空间坐标的分析表明,当把手朝向与反应手的同一侧时(实验1和实验2),参与者的触摸点会更偏向把手一侧横向移动。此外,右手的触摸点落点更高(更靠近把手),相比于左手的触摸点,尤其是当物体的垂直维度特别显著时(实验1)。总体而言,这些结果与运动解释所预测的激活手部运动程序以够到并抓握物体相一致,至少对于右手/优势手来说是这样。