• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用伸手触摸动作时左右手的手-手兼容性效应。

Handle-Hand Compatibility Effects for the Right and Left Hand Using Reach-to-Touch Movements.

作者信息

Garofalo Gioacchino, Mussi Davide R, Riggio Lucia

机构信息

Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma1.

School of Psychology, University of Reading Malaysia2.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Feb 1;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.5709/acp-0281-8. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0281-8
PMID:32665802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7341002/
Abstract

In stimulus-response compatibility tasks, performance is better when the handle of an object is oriented on the same side of the response than when the handle is oriented on the opposite side. Two major alternative accounts, the motor affordance and spatial accounts, have been proposed to explain this handle-hand compatibility effect. In two experiments, we tested between these two accounts by administering a go/no-go task to right-handed participants. Handled objects presented on a touchscreen were used as stimuli. Half of the participants had to reach-to-touch the stimuli by using their dominant hand, the other half by using their nondominant hand. Liftoff times (LTs), movement times (MTs) and spatial coordinates of the movement endpoints were recorded. Results from the LTs and MTs analyses showed no evidence of handle-hand compatibility effects. In contrast, the analyses of the spatial coordinates revealed that participants' touches were shifted more laterally towards the handle when the handles were oriented on the same side of the responding hand (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, the right-hand touches landed higher (towards the handle) than the left-hand touches, especially when the vertical object dimension was particularly salient (Experiment 1). Overall, these results are in line with the activation of hand motor programs to reach and grasp the object as predicted by the motor account, at least for the right/dominant hand.

摘要

在刺激-反应兼容性任务中,当物体的把手朝向与反应的同一侧时,表现要优于把手朝向与反应相反侧时。已经提出了两种主要的替代解释,即运动可供性解释和空间解释,来阐释这种把手-手部兼容性效应。在两项实验中,我们通过对右利手参与者进行一项“是/否”任务,对这两种解释进行了检验。呈现于触摸屏上的有把手物体被用作刺激物。一半参与者必须用优势手去触摸刺激物,另一半则用非优势手。记录了起始时间(LTs)、运动时间(MTs)以及运动终点的空间坐标。对起始时间和运动时间的分析结果未显示出把手-手部兼容性效应的证据。相比之下,对空间坐标的分析表明,当把手朝向与反应手的同一侧时(实验1和实验2),参与者的触摸点会更偏向把手一侧横向移动。此外,右手的触摸点落点更高(更靠近把手),相比于左手的触摸点,尤其是当物体的垂直维度特别显著时(实验1)。总体而言,这些结果与运动解释所预测的激活手部运动程序以够到并抓握物体相一致,至少对于右手/优势手来说是这样。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/ae0bed220d8a/acp-16-1-284-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/444f4c87f2d8/acp-16-1-284-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/527aea2f93c5/acp-16-1-284-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/39e9bbfdfdbe/acp-16-1-284-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/ae0bed220d8a/acp-16-1-284-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/444f4c87f2d8/acp-16-1-284-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/527aea2f93c5/acp-16-1-284-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/39e9bbfdfdbe/acp-16-1-284-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2966/7341002/ae0bed220d8a/acp-16-1-284-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Handle-Hand Compatibility Effects for the Right and Left Hand Using Reach-to-Touch Movements.使用伸手触摸动作时左右手的手-手兼容性效应。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Feb 1;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.5709/acp-0281-8. eCollection 2020.
2
Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.空间刺激-反应兼容性和可供性效应并非由相同机制所支配。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 18;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00283. eCollection 2015.
3
Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).规避基于物体的对应效应中的空间混淆因素:双手可供性任务(BMAT)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Nov;72(11):2605-2613. doi: 10.1177/1747021819852216. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?已抓住的物体是否激活运动功能?
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.明确的空间兼容性对于对象手柄效应并不关键。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1643-53. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000258. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Too much to handle? Interference from distractors with similar affordances on target selection for handled objects.难以应对?具有相似可操作性的干扰物会对被处理物体的目标选择产生干扰。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 29;18(8):e0290226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290226. eCollection 2023.
7
The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.知觉显著性在物体辨别中的突出作用:可抓握侧的显性辨别并不激活抓握功能。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1234-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01296-2. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
8
A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect.基于对象的兼容性效应的荟萃分析。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:105-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.028. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.反应类型对人和物体相互作用中的可供性和空间兼容性效应的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Nov;115(4):787-808. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12725. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
10
Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.使用早期反应成分区分物体提供的作用和空间兼容性效应。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 4;4:591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00591. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The different effects of breaking an object at different time points.在不同时间点打断物体的不同效果。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):942-952. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02210-0. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.单手手动对应效应:位置编码解释的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1383-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1009-4. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
A direct effect of perception on action when grasping a cup.当抓握杯子时,感知对动作的直接影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18591-5.
3
Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?剪影和照片是否产生了根本不同的基于对象的对应效应?
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Time course of motor affordances evoked by pictured objects and words.图片物体和单词引发的运动能力的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):53-68. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000431. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction.手把手对应效应中的位置编码账户与可供性激活账户:基于动作方向编码的类西蒙效应的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1647-1666. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000414. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.明确的空间兼容性对于对象手柄效应并不关键。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1643-53. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000258. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Alignment effects in beer mugs: Automatic action activation or response competition?啤酒杯中的对齐效应:自动动作激活还是反应竞争?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Aug;78(6):1665-80. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1130-7.
8
Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: silhouettes and photographs.区分西蒙效应和可供性兼容性效应:轮廓与照片
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):716-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
9
The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study.近空间和远空间中的空间对齐效应:一项运动学研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2431-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3943-8. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
10
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.