Sobrado Júnior Carlos Walter, Obregon Carlos de Almeida, E Sousa Júnior Afonso Henrique da Silva, Sobrado Lucas Faraco, Nahas Sérgio Carlos, Cecconello Ivan
Discipline of Coloproctology, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Aug;36(4):249-255. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.06. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Present an updated classification for symptomatic hemorrhoids, which not only guides the treatment of internal hemorrhoids but also the treatment of external components. In addition, this new classification includes new treatment alternatives created over the last few years.
Throughout the past 7 years, the authors developed a method to classify patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. This study, besides presenting this classification proposal, also retrospectively analyzed 149 consecutive patients treated between March 2011 and November 2013 and aimed to evaluate the association between the management adopted with Goligher classification and our proposed BPRST classification.
Both classifications had a statistically significant association with the adopted management strategies. However, the BPRST classification tended to have fewer management discrepancies when each stage of disease was individually analyzed.
Although there is much disagreement about how the classification of hemorrhoidal disease should be updated, it is accepted that some kind of revision is needed. The BPRST method showed a strong association with the management that should be adopted for each stage of the disease. Further studies are needed for its validation, but the current results are encouraging.
提出一种针对有症状痔的更新分类方法,该方法不仅能指导内痔的治疗,还能指导外痔部分的治疗。此外,这种新分类包括过去几年出现的新治疗选择。
在过去7年中,作者们开发了一种对有症状痔患者进行分类的方法。本研究除了提出这一分类建议外,还回顾性分析了2011年3月至2013年11月期间连续治疗的149例患者,旨在评估采用戈利格尔分类法与我们提出的BPRST分类法之间的管理关联。
两种分类法与所采用的管理策略均有统计学上的显著关联。然而,当对疾病的每个阶段进行单独分析时,BPRST分类法的管理差异往往较少。
尽管对于痔病分类应如何更新存在诸多分歧,但人们普遍认为需要进行某种修订。BPRST方法与疾病各阶段应采用的管理方法有很强的关联。其验证还需要进一步研究,但目前的结果令人鼓舞。