Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
Whereas the cognitive advantages brought about by bilingualism have recently been called into question, the so-called 'lexical deficit' in bilinguals is still largely taken for granted. Here, we argue that, in analogy with cognitive advantages, the lexical deficit does not apply across the board of bilinguals, but varies as a function of acquisition trajectory. To test this, we implement a novel methodological design, where the variables of bilingualism and first/second language status have been fully crossed in four different groups. While the results confirm effects of bilingualism on lexical proficiency and processing, they show more robust effects of age of acquisition. We conclude that the traditional view of the linguistic costs of bilingualism need to give way to a new understanding of lexical development in which age of acquisition is seen as a major determinant.
虽然双语带来的认知优势最近受到了质疑,但双语者所谓的“词汇缺陷”在很大程度上仍然被认为是理所当然的。在这里,我们认为,与认知优势类似,词汇缺陷并不是普遍适用于双语者的,而是随着习得轨迹的变化而变化。为了验证这一点,我们采用了一种新的方法设计,在四个不同的组中,双语和第一/第二语言状态的变量被完全交叉。虽然结果证实了双语对词汇熟练程度和处理的影响,但它们显示出获得年龄的影响更为显著。我们得出结论,传统的双语语言成本观点需要让位于一种新的词汇发展理解,其中获得年龄被视为一个主要决定因素。