The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chikamori Rehabilitation Hospital, 2-22 Nijudaimachi, Kochi, 780-0843, Kochi, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the upright, supine, and bridge positions. For the bridge position, each subject raised their waist against gravity, placed a cushion under their back, and bent their knees. The proximal contractile integral (PCI) and distal contractile integral (DCI), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), peristaltic breaks (PBs), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and expiratory and inspiratory esophagoesophageal junction (EGJ) pressure were measured. In the bridge position, PCI, DCI, IRP, and expiratory and inspiratory EGJ pressure were significantly higher than those in the upright position (bridge PCI vs. upright PCI [p = 0.001], bridge DCI vs. upright DCI [p < 0.001], bridge IRP vs. upright IRP [p = 0.018], bridge EGJ pressure vs. upright EGJ pressure [expiratory: p = 0.001] [inspiratory: p < 0.001]). PBs were significantly shorter and DL was significantly longer in the bridge position compared to upright (bridge PBs vs. upright PBs [p = 0.001], bridge DL vs. upright DL [p = 0.001]). IBP was significantly higher in the bridge position compared to supine (bridge IBP vs. supine IBP [p = 0.01]). These results demonstrated changes in esophageal motility according to changes in position while swallowing, where esophageal contractions became stronger against gravity. Further study is required to examine the effectiveness of swallowing in the bridge position.
最近,人们对不同体位对食管动力的影响产生了临床兴趣。本研究旨在使用高分辨率测压法确定三种不同体位对食管动力的影响。13 名健康成年人分别在直立、仰卧和桥位吞咽 5 毫升水。对于桥位,每个被试者将腰部抬离地面,在背部下方垫一个垫子,并弯曲膝盖。测量近端收缩积分(PCI)和远端收缩积分(DCI)、整合松弛压力(IRP)、远端潜伏期(DL)、蠕动中断(PBs)、腔内压力(IBP)以及呼气和吸气食管胃连接部(EGJ)压力。在桥位,PCI、DCI、IRP 和呼气与吸气 EGJ 压力均显著高于直立位(桥位 PCI 与直立位 PCI 相比[p=0.001],桥位 DCI 与直立位 DCI 相比[p<0.001],桥位 IRP 与直立位 IRP 相比[p=0.018],桥位 EGJ 压力与直立位 EGJ 压力相比[呼气:p=0.001] [吸气:p<0.001])。与直立位相比,桥位 PBs 明显更短,DL 明显更长(桥位 PBs 与直立位 PBs 相比[p=0.001],桥位 DL 与直立位 DL 相比[p=0.001])。与仰卧位相比,桥位 IBP 明显更高(桥位 IBP 与仰卧位 IBP 相比[p=0.01])。这些结果表明,吞咽时体位变化会引起食管动力的变化,食管收缩在对抗重力时变得更强。需要进一步研究来检验桥位吞咽的有效性。