• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用高分辨率测压法研究桥位吞咽对健康个体食管动力的影响。

Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry.

机构信息

The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chikamori Rehabilitation Hospital, 2-22 Nijudaimachi, Kochi, 780-0843, Kochi, Japan.

Department of Neurology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0
PMID:32749546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8289772/
Abstract

Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the upright, supine, and bridge positions. For the bridge position, each subject raised their waist against gravity, placed a cushion under their back, and bent their knees. The proximal contractile integral (PCI) and distal contractile integral (DCI), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), peristaltic breaks (PBs), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and expiratory and inspiratory esophagoesophageal junction (EGJ) pressure were measured. In the bridge position, PCI, DCI, IRP, and expiratory and inspiratory EGJ pressure were significantly higher than those in the upright position (bridge PCI vs. upright PCI [p = 0.001], bridge DCI vs. upright DCI [p < 0.001], bridge IRP vs. upright IRP [p = 0.018], bridge EGJ pressure vs. upright EGJ pressure [expiratory: p = 0.001] [inspiratory: p < 0.001]). PBs were significantly shorter and DL was significantly longer in the bridge position compared to upright (bridge PBs vs. upright PBs [p = 0.001], bridge DL vs. upright DL [p = 0.001]). IBP was significantly higher in the bridge position compared to supine (bridge IBP vs. supine IBP [p = 0.01]). These results demonstrated changes in esophageal motility according to changes in position while swallowing, where esophageal contractions became stronger against gravity. Further study is required to examine the effectiveness of swallowing in the bridge position.

摘要

最近,人们对不同体位对食管动力的影响产生了临床兴趣。本研究旨在使用高分辨率测压法确定三种不同体位对食管动力的影响。13 名健康成年人分别在直立、仰卧和桥位吞咽 5 毫升水。对于桥位,每个被试者将腰部抬离地面,在背部下方垫一个垫子,并弯曲膝盖。测量近端收缩积分(PCI)和远端收缩积分(DCI)、整合松弛压力(IRP)、远端潜伏期(DL)、蠕动中断(PBs)、腔内压力(IBP)以及呼气和吸气食管胃连接部(EGJ)压力。在桥位,PCI、DCI、IRP 和呼气与吸气 EGJ 压力均显著高于直立位(桥位 PCI 与直立位 PCI 相比[p=0.001],桥位 DCI 与直立位 DCI 相比[p<0.001],桥位 IRP 与直立位 IRP 相比[p=0.018],桥位 EGJ 压力与直立位 EGJ 压力相比[呼气:p=0.001] [吸气:p<0.001])。与直立位相比,桥位 PBs 明显更短,DL 明显更长(桥位 PBs 与直立位 PBs 相比[p=0.001],桥位 DL 与直立位 DL 相比[p=0.001])。与仰卧位相比,桥位 IBP 明显更高(桥位 IBP 与仰卧位 IBP 相比[p=0.01])。这些结果表明,吞咽时体位变化会引起食管动力的变化,食管收缩在对抗重力时变得更强。需要进一步研究来检验桥位吞咽的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/054b8f821ec0/455_2020_10169_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/a6631d2cbd17/455_2020_10169_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/bae99cb60e87/455_2020_10169_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/054b8f821ec0/455_2020_10169_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/a6631d2cbd17/455_2020_10169_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/bae99cb60e87/455_2020_10169_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/8289772/054b8f821ec0/455_2020_10169_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry.使用高分辨率测压法研究桥位吞咽对健康个体食管动力的影响。
Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.仰卧位和坐位时,Sandhill-Unisensor高分辨率测压组件所获数据的正常食管压力地形图指标。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):285-92. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12501. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
3
Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.当食管高分辨率测压时综合松弛压正常,推注期压力升高可识别梗阻性病变。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017 Jul 1;313(1):G73-G79. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00091.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
4
Changes in the esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction manometric feature based on the Chicago Classification updates.基于芝加哥分类更新的食管胃结合部流出梗阻测压特征变化。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 14;28(30):4163-4173. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4163.
5
Esophageal Motility in the Supine and Upright Positions for Liquid and Solid Swallows Through High-resolution Manometry.通过高分辨率测压法评估液体和固体吞咽时的仰卧位和直立位食管动力。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Oct;19(4):467-72. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.4.467. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
6
Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.泰国人群中仰卧位和直立位高分辨率测压的正常数值。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jan;63(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4838-x. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.不同姿势和激发吞咽材料对健康亚洲人群中芝加哥3.0标准指标的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;36(5):1244-1252. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15284. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
Effects of GABA-B agonist baclofen on esophageal motility: Studies using high-resolution manometry.GABA-B 受体激动剂巴氯芬对食管动力的影响:高分辨率测压法研究。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Dec;31(12):e13716. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13716. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
9
Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics.欧洲人群固态食管高分辨率测压的正常数值;当前所有指标概述
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 May;26(5):654-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12314. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
10
Effects of viscosity and volume on the patterns of esophageal motility in healthy adults using high-resolution manometry.使用高分辨率测压法研究粘度和容积对健康成年人食管动力模式的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Feb-Mar;28(2):145-50. doi: 10.1111/dote.12184. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Esophageal Dysfunction in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Myositis.免疫检查点抑制剂相关肌炎中的食管功能障碍
Intern Med. 2025 Jul 1;64(13):2068-2072. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4254-24. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Efficacy of the Bridge Dry Swallowing Exercise for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.桥式空吞咽练习对难治性胃食管反流病的疗效
Intern Med. 2025 Jun 15;64(12):1799-1807. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4054-24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Bridge Swallowing Exercise for Stroke Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Case Series.

本文引用的文献

1
Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.食管扩张和收缩的地形学研究:体位对食管蠕动和食团传输的影响。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019 Apr 1;316(4):G519-G526. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00397.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Effect of Body Position on Pharyngeal Swallowing Pressures Using High-Resolution Manometry.采用高分辨率测压法研究体位对咽部吞咽压力的影响。
Dysphagia. 2018 Jun;33(3):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9866-3. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
3
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015.
针对有胃食管反流病症状的中风患者的桥式吞咽训练:病例系列
Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov 17;7:20220058. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220058. eCollection 2022.
4
Bridge Swallowing Exercise for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Pilot Study.用于胃食管反流病症状的桥式吞咽练习:一项初步研究。
Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 Oct 8;7:20220054. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220054. eCollection 2022.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Sarcopenic Dysphagia: A Scoping Review.肌少症性吞咽困难的诊断与治疗:一项范围综述
Dysphagia. 2021 Jun;36(3):523-531. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10266-8. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
《2015年胃食管反流病循证临床实践指南》
J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;51(8):751-67. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1227-8. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
How the Body Position Can Influence High-resolution Manometry Results in the Study of Esophageal Dysphagia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.在食管吞咽困难和胃食管反流病研究中,身体姿势如何影响高分辨率测压结果。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jul 30;21(3):370-9. doi: 10.5056/jnm14110.
5
Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.仰卧位和坐位时,Sandhill-Unisensor高分辨率测压组件所获数据的正常食管压力地形图指标。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):285-92. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12501. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
6
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter.由ManoScan和带有单传感器导管的新系统产生的(由芝加哥标准定义的)变异参数值。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):188-94. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12446. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
Esophageal Motility in the Supine and Upright Positions for Liquid and Solid Swallows Through High-resolution Manometry.通过高分辨率测压法评估液体和固体吞咽时的仰卧位和直立位食管动力。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Oct;19(4):467-72. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.4.467. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring.胃和食管上嗳气的机制:使用同时进行的高分辨率测压和阻抗监测的研究。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Dec;24(12):e573-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12024. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
10
The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.**标题**:坐姿与仰卧位对食管正常压力地形图指标及芝加哥分类食管动力障碍诊断的影响。 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Oct;24(10):e509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.02001.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.