• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟层面食品环境政策的力度和优先建议,以创造健康的食品环境。

Strength of EU-level food environment policies and priority recommendations to create healthy food environments.

机构信息

Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):504-511. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac010.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckac010
PMID:35265982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food environments impact on diets, obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Government policies are essential to create healthy food environments. This study aimed to assess the strength of European Union (EU)-level policies, and identify and prioritize actions for the EU to create healthy food environments.

METHODS

The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) was applied. The Food-EPI included 26 policy and 24 infrastructure support indicators. Independent experts (n = 31) rated the strength of EU-level policies and infrastructure support for each of these indicators (on a 5-point scale, from very weak to very strong) and identified and prioritized actions to improve food environments.

RESULTS

For 65% of the 26 policy indicators, EU-level policies were rated as weak and for 23% as very weak. For 63% of the 24 infrastructure support indicators, EU-level policies were rated as moderate and for 33% as weak. The experts recommended 18 policy and 19 infrastructure support actions to the EU. The Top 5 prioritized policy actions included three actions in the food composition domain (e.g. setting mandatory food composition targets), one action in the food prices domain and one action in the food promotion domain. The Top 5 prioritized infrastructure support actions included three actions in the leadership domain (e.g. developing a high-level NCDs Prevention Strategy) and two actions in the monitoring domain.

CONCLUSIONS

There is large potential for the EU to strengthen its policies and infrastructure support in order to improve food environments. This study specifies priority actions for the EU to create healthy food environments.

摘要

背景

食品环境会影响饮食、肥胖和非传染性疾病(NCD)。政府政策对于创建健康的食品环境至关重要。本研究旨在评估欧盟(EU)层面政策的力度,并确定和优先考虑欧盟为创建健康食品环境而采取的行动。

方法

应用了健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)。Food-EPI 包括 26 项政策和 24 项基础设施支持指标。独立专家(n=31)对这些指标中的每一项(5 分制,从非常弱到非常强)的欧盟层面政策和基础设施支持力度进行了评分,并确定和优先考虑了改善食品环境的行动。

结果

对于 26 项政策指标中的 65%,欧盟层面的政策被评为薄弱,23%被评为非常薄弱。对于 24 项基础设施支持指标中的 63%,欧盟层面的政策被评为中等,33%被评为薄弱。专家向欧盟推荐了 18 项政策和 19 项基础设施支持行动。排名前五的优先政策行动包括三个食品成分领域的行动(例如,设定强制性食品成分目标)、一个食品价格领域的行动和一个食品推广领域的行动。排名前五的优先基础设施支持行动包括三个领导力领域的行动(例如,制定高水平的非传染性疾病预防战略)和两个监测领域的行动。

结论

欧盟有很大的潜力加强其政策和基础设施支持,以改善食品环境。本研究为欧盟创建健康食品环境确定了优先行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/54cb46f56e84/ckac010f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/c57ffcd0a027/ckac010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/8ba19995beac/ckac010f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/54cb46f56e84/ckac010f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/c57ffcd0a027/ckac010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/8ba19995beac/ckac010f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d79b/9159309/54cb46f56e84/ckac010f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Strength of EU-level food environment policies and priority recommendations to create healthy food environments.欧盟层面食品环境政策的力度和优先建议,以创造健康的食品环境。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):504-511. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac010.
2
Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel's assessment and priority recommendations.肯尼亚预防与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的食品环境政策基准测试:国家专家小组的评估和重点建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
3
How can National Government Policies Improve Food Environments in the Netherlands?国家政策如何改善荷兰的食物环境?
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;67:1604115. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604115. eCollection 2022.
4
Policy implementation and priorities to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): A pooled level analysis across eleven European countries.使用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)创建健康食品环境的政策实施与优先事项:对11个欧洲国家的汇总水平分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Nov 16;23:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala.与最佳实践相比,对公共政策进行基准测试以创建健康食品环境:危地马拉的健康食品环境政策指数
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;80(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w.
6
Pilot test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to increase government actions for creating healthy food environments.健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的初步测试,以增加政府为营造健康食品环境而采取的行动。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 9;5(1):e006194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194.
7
Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction.在新西兰实施健康食品环境政策:九年无所作为。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 15;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8.
8
Implementation of healthy food environment policies to prevent nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana: National experts' assessment of government action.加纳实施健康食品环境政策以预防营养相关非传染性疾病:国家专家对政府行动的评估
Food Policy. 2020 May;93:101907. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101907.
9
Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy Food Environment Policy Index.监测和基准化政府政策和行动,以改善食品环境的健康程度:拟议的政府健康食品环境政策指数。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:24-37. doi: 10.1111/obr.12073.
10
Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts' Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).在加拿大创建更健康的食物环境的政策:使用健康食物环境政策指数(Food-EPI)评估专家和优先行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224473.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.与商业行为体合作改善食品环境的有效性:一项系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2025 Oct;26(10):e13952. doi: 10.1111/obr.13952. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
2
Voicing residents' perception of (commercial) food cues in outdoor public spaces: a photovoice study.表达居民对户外公共场所(商业)食物线索的认知:一项摄影声音研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):1496. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22619-1.
3
Identifying mechanisms that shape the food environment in long-term healthcare facilities in the Netherlands: a participatory system dynamics approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Food policies: in times of COVID-19 and beyond.食品政策:在新冠疫情期间及之后
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):319. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00123-6. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Benchmarking as a Public Health Strategy for Creating Healthy Food Environments: An Evaluation of the INFORMAS Initiative (2012-2020).作为创建健康食品环境的公共卫生策略的基准评估:对INFORMAS倡议(2012 - 2020年)的评价
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:345-362. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-100919-114442. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
识别塑造荷兰长期医疗机构食物环境的机制:一种参与式系统动力学方法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21124-1.
4
Temptation at every corner: exploring public perceptions of food cues and policy support for governmental food cue regulation in outdoor public spaces.处处皆诱惑:探究公众对食物线索的认知以及政府对户外公共场所食物线索监管的政策支持
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 31;22(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03818-w.
5
Current Insights into Industrial Trans Fatty Acids Legal Frameworks and Health Challenges in the European Union and Spain.欧盟和西班牙工业反式脂肪酸法律框架与健康挑战的当前见解
Foods. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):3845. doi: 10.3390/foods13233845.
6
An unbiased, sustainable, evidence-informed Universal Food Guide: a timely template for national food guides.一个公正、可持续、基于证据的通用食品指南:国家食品指南的及时模板。
Nutr J. 2024 Oct 18;23(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01018-z.
7
Systems thinking for local food environments: a participatory approach identifying leverage points and actions for healthy and sustainable transformations.系统思维在本地食物环境中的应用:一种参与式方法,确定促进健康和可持续转型的着力点和行动。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 12;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01199-3.
8
Supporting health and wellbeing in health care employees: a documentary review of organizational policies, strategies and frameworks.支持医护人员的健康与福祉:对组织政策、战略和框架的文献综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 30;6:1308603. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1308603. eCollection 2024.
9
A Right to Health-Based Approach to Dental Caries: Toward a Comprehensive Control Strategy.基于健康权的龋齿防治方法:迈向综合控制策略
Caries Res. 2024;58(4):444-453. doi: 10.1159/000538459. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
10
Upstream Determinants of Overweight and Obesity in Europe.欧洲超重和肥胖的上游决定因素。
Curr Obes Rep. 2023 Dec;12(4):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00524-1. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
4
An overview of the commercial determinants of health.商业健康决定因素概述。
Global Health. 2020 Aug 17;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00607-x.
5
What role should the commercial food system play in promoting health through better diet?商业食品系统在通过改善饮食促进健康方面应发挥什么作用?
BMJ. 2020 Mar 17;368:m545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m545.
6
Transforming the food system to fight non-communicable diseases.转变食物体系以应对非传染性疾病
BMJ. 2019 Jan 28;364:l296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l296.
7
An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018.11 个国家使用健康食品环境政策指数对各国政府实施推荐营养政策的情况进行基准测试,2015-2018 年。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:57-66. doi: 10.1111/obr.12819. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
8
Lobbying against sugar taxation in the European Union: Analysing the lobbying arguments and tactics of stakeholders in the food and drink industries.在欧盟反对糖税:分析食品和饮料行业利益相关者的游说论点和策略。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Jul;47(5):565-575. doi: 10.1177/1403494818787102. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Role of government policy in nutrition-barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating.政府政策在营养方面的作用——阻碍健康饮食的因素和促进健康饮食的机会。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2426.
10
Public health policies to encourage healthy eating habits: recent perspectives.鼓励健康饮食习惯的公共卫生政策:近期观点
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Sep 23;7:81-90. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69188. eCollection 2015.