Hu Jia, Zhou Zhi-Yu, Ran Hong-Ling, Yuan Xin-Chun, Zeng Xi, Zhang Zhe-Yuan
Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.
College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21652. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021652.
To investigate the diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound imaging composed of conventional ultrasonography (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), and shear wave elastography (SWE) for liver tumors.Between October 2017 and October 2019, US, CEUS, and SWE examinations of a total of 158 liver tumors in 136 patients at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were performed. The histopathological or imaging diagnostic results were used as controls to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US, CEUS, SWE, and multimodal ultrasound imaging, which combines these 3 modes, in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors.Among the 158 tumors, there were 64 benign tumors, including 55 cases of hepatic hemangioma, 3 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver, 4 cases of hepatic cyst, and 2 cases of focal nonuniform distribution of fat in the liver. There were 94 malignant tumors, including 32 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, 22 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, 29 cases of metastatic liver cancer, and 11 cases of dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver. In the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 82.56%, 68.06%, 75.96%, 75.53%, and 76.56% for US; 92.39%, 86.36%, 89.87%, 90.43%, and 89.06% for CEUS; 87.14%, 76.81%, 82.91%, 82.98%, and 82.81% for SWE; and 97.85%, 95.38%, 96.83%, 96.81%, and 96.88% for multimodal ultrasound imaging, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were all significantly higher for multimodal ultrasound imaging than those values for US, CEUS, and SWE (all P < .05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for US, CEUS, SWE, and multimodal ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors were 0.760, 0.897, 0.829, and 0.968, respectively.US, CEUS, and SWE all have diagnostic value in the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors. Multimodal ultrasound imaging could significantly increase the accuracy of the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors and has higher value for clinical application.
探讨常规超声(US)、超声造影(CEUS)及剪切波弹性成像(SWE)组成的多模态超声成像对肝脏肿瘤的诊断价值。2017年10月至2019年10月,对南昌大学第一附属医院136例患者的158个肝脏肿瘤进行了US、CEUS及SWE检查。以组织病理学或影像学诊断结果为对照,评估US、CEUS、SWE以及联合这三种模式的多模态超声成像在肝脏良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。158个肿瘤中,良性肿瘤64个,包括肝血管瘤55例、肝脏局灶性结节性增生3例、肝囊肿4例、肝脏局灶性脂肪分布不均2例。恶性肿瘤94个,包括肝细胞癌32例、肝内胆管细胞癌22例、转移性肝癌29例、肝硬化不典型增生结节11例。在肝脏良恶性肿瘤诊断中,US的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为82.56%、68.06%、75.96%、75.53%和76.56%;CEUS分别为92.39%、86.36%、89.87%、90.43%和89.06%;SWE分别为87.14%、76.81%、82.91%、82.98%和82.81%;多模态超声成像分别为97.85%、95.38%、96.83%、96.81%和96.88%。多模态超声成像的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均显著高于US、CEUS及SWE(均P<0.05)。US、CEUS、SWE及多模态超声成像在肝脏良恶性肿瘤诊断中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.760、0.897、0.829和0.968。US、CEUS及SWE在肝脏良恶性肿瘤诊断中均具有诊断价值。多模态超声成像可显著提高肝脏良恶性肿瘤诊断的准确性,具有较高的临床应用价值。