Suppr超能文献

深蹲与硬拉在下肢力量和功率训练方面的比较

A Comparison Between the Squat and the Deadlift for Lower Body Strength and Power Training.

作者信息

Nigro Federico, Bartolomei Sandro

机构信息

Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:145-152. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0139. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two resistance training programs including either a deadlift or a parallel squat on lower body maximal strength and power in resistance trained males. Twenty-five resistance trained men were randomly assigned to a deadlift group (DE; n = 14; age = 24.3 ± 4.1 y; body mass = 84.8 ± 14.2 kg; body height = 180.3 ± 6.8 cm) or to a squat group (SQ; n = 11; age = 22.3 ± 1.6 y; body mass = 83.0 ± 13.6 kg; body height 179.9 ± 6.1 cm). Both groups trained 3 times per week for 6 weeks. The deadlift and the squat were the only lower body maximal strength exercises performed by DE and SQ groups, respectively, while both training programs included jumps. A significantly (p = 0.017) greater increase in deadlift 1RM was observed in the DE compared to the SQ group, while the SQ group obtained a significantly (p = 0.049) greater increase in squat 1RM. A significant increase in jump performance (p = 0.010), without significant interactions between groups (p = 0.552), was observed in both groups. Three participants of the DE group developed lower back pain and were excluded from the study. Results indicate that both the squat and the deadlift can result in similar improvement in lower body maximal strength and jump performance and can be successfully included in strength training programs. The incidence of back pain in the DE group may suggest a marked stress of this exercise on the lower back. Proper technique should be used to minimize the risk of injury, especially when the deadlift is performed.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种抗阻训练计划(包括硬拉或平行深蹲)对有抗阻训练经验男性的下肢最大力量和爆发力的影响。25名有抗阻训练经验的男性被随机分配到硬拉组(DE;n = 14;年龄 = 24.3 ± 4.1岁;体重 = 84.8 ± 14.2千克;身高 = 180.3 ± 6.8厘米)或深蹲组(SQ;n = 11;年龄 = 22.3 ± 1.6岁;体重 = 83.0 ± 13.6千克;身高179.9 ± 6.1厘米)。两组均每周训练3次,共训练6周。硬拉和深蹲分别是DE组和SQ组进行的唯一下肢最大力量练习,而两个训练计划都包括跳跃练习。与SQ组相比,DE组的1次最大重复量硬拉显著增加(p = 0.017),而SQ组的1次最大重复量深蹲显著增加(p = 0.049)。两组的跳跃表现均显著提高(p = 0.010),且组间无显著交互作用(p = 0.552)。DE组有3名参与者出现下背部疼痛,被排除在研究之外。结果表明,深蹲和硬拉均可使下肢最大力量和跳跃表现得到相似程度的改善,且均可成功纳入力量训练计划。DE组的背痛发生率可能表明该练习对下背部有明显压力。应采用正确的技术以将受伤风险降至最低,尤其是在进行硬拉时。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Half Squat Mechanical Analysis Based on PBT Framework.基于PBT框架的半蹲力学分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;12(6):603. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060603.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Tempo of Resistance Exercise Impact Training Volume?抗阻训练的节奏会影响训练量吗?
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:241-250. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0034. eCollection 2018 Jun.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验