Greenough A, Greenall F
Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1988 Feb;63(2):168-71. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.2.168.
To compare the accuracy of clinical observation and detailed respiratory recordings in identifying infants at high risk of developing pneumothoraces 10 infants, with idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome, were studied at three different ventilator rates. All infants with synchronous respiration at fast rates were correctly identified by clinical observation. The clinical signs used to identify 'high risk' interactions--that is, active expiration and asynchronous breathing--were obvious respiratory efforts and a failure of improvement in oxygenation at increased rates. These criteria enabled correct identification of 'high risk' respiratory patterns on 15 (88%) of the 17 study occasions. These clinical criteria were then used as criteria for selective paralysis; no infant developed a pneumothorax during ventilation.
为比较临床观察与详细呼吸记录在识别有发生气胸高风险婴儿方面的准确性,对10名患有特发性呼吸窘迫综合征的婴儿在三种不同通气速率下进行了研究。所有在快速通气时同步呼吸的婴儿均通过临床观察被正确识别。用于识别“高风险”相互作用(即主动呼气和呼吸不同步)的临床体征为明显的呼吸用力以及通气速率增加时氧合无改善。这些标准在17次研究中有15次(88%)能够正确识别“高风险”呼吸模式。然后将这些临床标准用作选择性麻痹的标准;在通气过程中没有婴儿发生气胸。