Chen Zhihui, Schlafer Sebastian, Göstemeyer Gerd, Schwendicke Falk
Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 21;8(9):1272. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091272.
While probiotics have been tested for their anti-caries effect in vitro and also clinically, there is a lack of understanding of their effects on complex dental biofilms. We assessed two probiotics, and , on a continuous-cultured model containing , and . Cariogenic biofilms were grown on bovine enamel specimens and daily challenged with or whole culture (LC/SC) or cell-free supernatant (LS/SS) or medium only (negative control, NC) ( = 21/group) for 10 days. Biofilm was assessed via counting colony-forming units, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Caries activity was determined by pH measurements and by assessing mineral loss (ΔZ) using transverse microradiography. Both LC and SC significantly reduced total and strain-specific cariogenic bacterial numbers ( < 0.05). ΔZ was reduced in LC (mean ± SD: 1846.67 ± 317.89) and SC (3315.87 ± 617.30) compared to NC (4681.48 ± 495.18, < 0.05). No significant reductions in bacterial numbers and ΔZ was induced by supernatants. Biofilm architecture was not considerably affected by probiotic applications. Viable probiotics and , but not their culture supernatants, could reduce the caries activity of multi-species biofilms .
虽然益生菌已在体外和临床中测试过其防龋效果,但对其在复杂牙菌斑生物膜上的作用仍缺乏了解。我们在一个包含变形链球菌、远缘链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌的连续培养模型中评估了两种益生菌,嗜酸乳杆菌和唾液乳杆菌。在牛牙釉质标本上培养致龋生物膜,并每天用嗜酸乳杆菌或唾液乳杆菌的全菌培养物(LC/SC)或无细胞上清液(LS/SS)或仅用培养基(阴性对照,NC)(每组n = 21)处理10天。通过计数菌落形成单位、定量聚合酶链反应和荧光原位杂交来评估生物膜。通过pH测量和使用横向显微放射照相术评估矿物质损失(ΔZ)来确定龋活性。LC和SC均显著降低了总的和菌株特异性的致龋细菌数量(P < 0.05)。与NC(4681.48 ± 495.18)相比,LC(平均值±标准差:1846.67 ± 317.89)和SC(3315.87 ± 617.30)中的ΔZ降低(P < 0.05)。上清液未诱导细菌数量和ΔZ的显著降低。益生菌处理对生物膜结构没有显著影响。有活力的嗜酸乳杆菌和唾液乳杆菌,而不是它们的培养上清液,可以降低多物种生物膜的龋活性。