• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impacts of Gentrification on Health in the US: a Systematic Review of the Literature.美国内城更新对健康的影响:文献系统综述。
J Urban Health. 2020 Dec;97(6):845-856. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00448-4.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Gentrification, Neighborhood Change, and Population Health: a Systematic Review.绅士化、邻里变化与人口健康:系统评价。
J Urban Health. 2020 Feb;97(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00400-1.
5
"Clear action requires clear thinking": A systematic review of gentrification and health research in the United States.“明确的行动需要明确的思考”:美国内城区复兴与健康研究的系统综述。
Health Place. 2019 Sep;59:102173. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102173. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Urban renewal, gentrification and health equity: a realist perspective.城市更新、 gentrification 和健康公平:现实主义的视角。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):243-248. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx202.
7
Defining gentrification for epidemiologic research: A systematic review.为流行病学研究定义绅士化:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233361. eCollection 2020.
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review.邻里社会经济过程与动态和健康老龄化:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6745. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116745.
10
Gentrification: A Priority for Environmental Justice and Health Equity Research.绅士化:环境正义和健康公平研究的优先事项。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jul 9;30(3):509-512. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.3.509. eCollection 2020 Summer.

引用本文的文献

1
Redlining, gentrification, and Black American mental health: A scoping review.红线划定、城市绅士化与美国黑人心理健康:一项范围综述。
Hous Soc. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1080/08882746.2025.2490358.
2
Rethinking the effects of gentrification on the health of Black communities in the United States: Towards a racialized health framework.重新思考美国中产阶级化对黑人社区健康的影响:迈向种族化健康框架。
J Urban Aff. 2025;47(6):2048-2070. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2023.2268761. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Gentrification influences mosquito community composition at neighborhood and county levels in Miami-Dade County, Florida.绅士化影响了佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县社区及县级层面的蚊子群落组成。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0324571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324571. eCollection 2025.
4
A Longitudinal Ecologic Analysis of Neighborhood-Level Social Inequalities in Health in Texas.德克萨斯州邻里层面健康社会不平等的纵向生态分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 5;22(7):1076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071076.
5
Structural drivers of health among transgender women in the United States: A nationwide study.美国跨性别女性健康的结构驱动因素:一项全国性研究。
Health Place. 2025 Jul 5;95:103511. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103511.
6
Experiences of discrimination across the life course among pregnancy planners in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大孕期计划者在人生历程中的歧视经历。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 11;30:101803. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101803. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Mapping gentrification, segregation, rental cost burden and sexually transmitted infections in Atlanta, Georgia, 2005-2018.绘制 2005-2018 年佐治亚州亚特兰大的 gentrification(高档化)、segregation(隔离)、租金负担和性传播感染情况。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;51:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2024.100680. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
8
High street retail environment interventions and their theorised impacts on health and wellbeing: A scoping review.高街零售环境干预及其对健康和幸福感的理论影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0312826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312826. eCollection 2024.
9
A Review of the Public Health Literature Examining the Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Race/Ethnicity on Health Outcomes in the United States.一篇审视社会经济地位和种族/族裔在美国健康结果中所起作用的公共卫生文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02195-7.
10
Historical Redlining, Contemporary Gentrification, and Severe Maternal Morbidity in California, 2005-2018.历史上的红线政策、当代的高档化以及 2005-2018 年加利福尼亚州严重的产妇发病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2429428. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29428.

本文引用的文献

1
Gentrification and Displacement in the San Francisco Bay Area: A Comparison of Measurement Approaches.旧金山湾区的绅士化与居民外迁:测量方法比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 25;16(12):2246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122246.
2
Evaluating gentrification's relation to neighborhood and city health.评估中产阶级化与社区和城市健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 19;13(11):e0207432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207432. eCollection 2018.
3
Health in changing neighborhoods: A study of the relationship between gentrification and self-rated health in the state of California.变迁社区中的健康:加利福尼亚州绅士化与自评健康之间的关系研究
Health Place. 2018 Jul;52:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review.评估研究和研究综合报告偏倚风险的工具:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019703.
5
Impact of residential displacement on healthcare access and mental health among original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods in New York City.纽约市绅士化社区原居民居住地变迁对医疗保健可及性及心理健康的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190139. eCollection 2017.
6
Urban renewal, gentrification and health equity: a realist perspective.城市更新、 gentrification 和健康公平:现实主义的视角。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):243-248. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx202.
7
Aging in Place in Gentrifying Neighborhoods: Implications for Physical and Mental Health.在高档化社区中就地老龄化:对身心健康的影响。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx105.
8
Invited Commentary: The Enduring Role of "Place" in Health-A Historic Perspective.特邀评论:“场所”在健康中的持久作用——历史视角
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1203-1205. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx085.
9
Regeneration and health: a structured, rapid literature review.再生与健康:结构化快速文献综述。
Public Health. 2017 Jul;148:69-87. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
The Association of Minority Self-Rated Health with Black versus White Gentrification.少数族裔自我评定健康状况与黑人及白人中产阶级化的关联
J Urban Health. 2016 Dec;93(6):909-922. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0087-0.

美国内城更新对健康的影响:文献系统综述。

Impacts of Gentrification on Health in the US: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Room W-7513D, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2020 Dec;97(6):845-856. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00448-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-020-00448-4
PMID:32829469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7704880/
Abstract

Gentrification in the largest 50 US cities has more than doubled since the 1990s. The process of gentrification can bring about improved neighborhood conditions, reduced rates of crime, and property value increases. At the same time, it can equally foster negative conditions associated with poorer health outcomes, such as disrupted social networks from residential displacement and increases in stress. While neighborhood environment is consistently implicated in health outcomes research, gentrification is rarely conceptualized as a public health issue. Though research on gentrification is growing, empirical studies evaluating the health impacts of gentrification in the US are poorly understood. Here we systematically review US population-based empirical studies examining relationships between gentrification and health. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Academic Search Complete) were searched using a combination of terms to identify peer-reviewed studies published on or before July 9, 2018, reporting associations between gentrification and health. Study title and abstract screenings were followed by full-text review of all studies meeting the following inclusion criteria of: ≥ 1 quantitative measure of association for a health outcome, within the context of gentrification; peer-reviewed research; located in the US; and English language. Of 8937 studies identified, 6152 underwent title and abstract screening, and 50 studies underwent full-text screening, yielding six studies for review. Gentrification exposure measures and health outcomes examined varied widely. Most studies reported little to no overall association between gentrification and health outcomes; however, gentrification was repeatedly associated with undesirable health effects among Black and economically vulnerable residents. Despite seemingly overall null associations between gentrification and health, evidence suggests that gentrification may negatively impact the health of certain populations, particularly Black and low-income individuals. Complexities inherent in operationalizing gentrification point toward the need for validated measures. Additionally, understanding how gentrification-health associations differ across health endpoints, race/ethnicities, socioeconomic status, and life course can provide insight into whether this process contributes to urban inequality and health disparities. As gentrification occurs across the US, it is important to understand how this process impacts health. While aging cities reinvest in the revitalization of communities, empirical research examining relationships between gentrification and health can help inform policy decisions.

摘要

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,美国最大的 50 个城市的高档化现象增加了一倍多。高档化进程可能带来改善的社区条件、降低犯罪率和增加财产价值。与此同时,它同样会助长与较差健康结果相关的负面条件,例如由于住宅搬迁而破坏社会网络和增加压力。虽然邻里环境一直被认为是健康结果研究的一个因素,但高档化很少被视为一个公共卫生问题。虽然关于高档化的研究在不断增加,但对美国高档化对健康影响的实证研究还不太了解。在这里,我们系统地回顾了美国基于人群的实证研究,这些研究考察了高档化与健康之间的关系。使用了一系列术语的电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Academic Search Complete)进行了搜索,以确定在 2018 年 7 月 9 日之前发表的、报告高档化与健康之间关系的同行评议研究。对研究标题和摘要进行筛选,然后对所有符合以下纳入标准的研究进行全文审查:至少有一个健康结果的定量衡量指标,在高档化的背景下;同行评议研究;位于美国;以及英语。在确定的 8937 项研究中,有 6152 项经过了标题和摘要筛选,50 项经过了全文筛选,最终有 6 项研究进行了综述。高档化暴露测量和健康结果的检查差异很大。大多数研究报告说,高档化与健康结果之间几乎没有总体关联;然而,高档化一再与黑人居民和经济脆弱居民的不良健康影响有关。尽管高档化与健康之间似乎存在总体上的无关联,但有证据表明,高档化可能会对某些人群的健康产生负面影响,特别是黑人居民和低收入人群。在操作高档化方面固有的复杂性表明需要验证措施。此外,了解高档化与健康之间的关联如何因健康终点、种族/族裔、社会经济地位和生命历程而有所不同,可以深入了解这一过程是否导致了城市不平等和健康差距。随着高档化在美国各地的发生,了解这一过程如何影响健康非常重要。随着老龄化城市对社区的振兴进行再投资,审查高档化与健康之间关系的实证研究可以帮助为政策决策提供信息。