• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms.使用先进的机器学习算法预测糖尿病并发症。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1343-1351. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa120.
2
Predicting respiratory motion using a novel patient specific dual deep recurrent neural networks.使用一种新型的患者特异性双深度循环神经网络预测呼吸运动。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 Sep 29;8(6). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac938f.
3
Prediction of Head Movement in 360-Degree Videos Using Attention Model.基于注意力模型的 360 度视频中头部运动预测
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 25;21(11):3678. doi: 10.3390/s21113678.
4
Hybrid Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Noise Reduction of MEMS-IMU with Static and Dynamic Conditions.用于在静态和动态条件下降低MEMS-IMU噪声的混合深度循环神经网络
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 Feb 20;12(2):214. doi: 10.3390/mi12020214.
5
Extended-Range Prediction Model Using NSGA-III Optimized RNN-GRU-LSTM for Driver Stress and Drowsiness.基于 NSGA-III 优化 RNN-GRU-LSTM 的驾驶员应激和困倦的扩展范围预测模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;21(19):6412. doi: 10.3390/s21196412.
6
[Application of recurrent neural network in prognosis of peritoneal dialysis].[循环神经网络在腹膜透析预后中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jun 18;51(3):602-608. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.034.
7
An Economic Forecasting Method Based on the LightGBM-Optimized LSTM and Time-Series Model.基于 LightGBM 优化的 LSTM 和时间序列模型的经济预测方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Sep 28;2021:8128879. doi: 10.1155/2021/8128879. eCollection 2021.
8
A comparative study on deep learning models for text classification of unstructured medical notes with various levels of class imbalance.深度学习模型在不同类别不平衡程度的非结构化医疗记录文本分类中的对比研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01665-y.
9
Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.优化神经网络在医学数据集上的应用:以新生儿呼吸暂停预测为例的研究
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Developing an Individual Glucose Prediction Model Using Recurrent Neural Network.使用递归神经网络开发个体血糖预测模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;20(22):6460. doi: 10.3390/s20226460.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease among people with type 2 diabetes with artificial intelligence models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用人工智能模型预测2型糖尿病患者中风、心血管疾病和外周血管疾病的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e2116. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.2116. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Engineering novel features for diabetes complication prediction using synthetic electronic health records.利用合成电子健康记录设计用于糖尿病并发症预测的新特征。
Front Genet. 2025 Apr 14;16:1451290. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1451290. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive ability of visit-to-visit glucose variability on diabetes complications.就诊间血糖变异性对糖尿病并发症的预测能力。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02964-2.
4
Group-informed attentive framework for enhanced diabetes mellitus progression prediction.基于群组信息的注意力机制框架增强糖尿病进程预测
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 24;15:1388103. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1388103. eCollection 2024.
5
Can generative artificial intelligence pass the orthopaedic board examination?生成式人工智能能通过骨科医师资格考试吗?
J Orthop. 2023 Nov 5;53:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.026. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Prediction of complications in diabetes mellitus using machine learning models with transplanted topic model features.使用具有移植主题模型特征的机器学习模型预测糖尿病并发症
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Oct 6;14(1):163-171. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00322-7. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Depression prediction based on LassoNet-RNN model: A longitudinal study.基于LassoNet-RNN模型的抑郁症预测:一项纵向研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 5;9(10):e20684. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20684. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges.人工智能在糖尿病管理中的应用:进展、机遇与挑战。
Cell Rep Med. 2023 Oct 17;4(10):101213. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101213. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
A fair and interpretable network for clinical risk prediction: a regularized multi-view multi-task learning approach.一种用于临床风险预测的公平且可解释的网络:一种正则化多视图多任务学习方法。
Knowl Inf Syst. 2023 Apr;65(4):1487-1521. doi: 10.1007/s10115-022-01813-2. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
10
Machine Learning for Predicting Micro- and Macrovascular Complications in Individuals With Prediabetes or Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.机器学习预测糖尿病前期或糖尿病个体的微血管和大血管并发症:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 27;25:e42181. doi: 10.2196/42181.

本文引用的文献

1
MetaPred: Meta-Learning for Clinical Risk Prediction with Limited Patient Electronic Health Records.MetaPred:利用有限患者电子健康记录进行临床风险预测的元学习
KDD. 2019 Aug;2019:2487-2495. doi: 10.1145/3292500.3330779.
2
Benefits and harms of intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制的获益与危害。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 5;367:l5887. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5887.
3
Prognostic Modeling and Prevention of Diabetes Using Machine Learning Technique.使用机器学习技术对糖尿病进行预后建模和预防。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 24;9(1):13805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49563-6.
4
Update on Management of Type 2 Diabetes for Cardiologists.心脏病专家对2型糖尿病管理的最新进展
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(4):273-280. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-4-273.
5
Deep Learning in Medicine-Promise, Progress, and Challenges.医学中的深度学习——前景、进展与挑战
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):293-294. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7117.
6
Diabetic Kidney Disease.糖尿病肾病
Mo Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;113(5):390-394.
7
Mixed effect machine learning: A framework for predicting longitudinal change in hemoglobin A1c.混合效应机器学习:预测血红蛋白 A1c 纵向变化的框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jan;89:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Treatment of type 2 diabetes: future approaches.2 型糖尿病的治疗:未来的方法。
Br Med Bull. 2018 Jun 1;126(1):123-137. doi: 10.1093/brimed/ldy013.
9
Artificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review.用于糖尿病管理和决策支持的人工智能:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e10775. doi: 10.2196/10775.
10
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法的共识声明 - 2018执行摘要
Endocr Pract. 2018 Jan;24(1):91-120. doi: 10.4158/CS-2017-0153. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

使用先进的机器学习算法预测糖尿病并发症。

Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms.

机构信息

Center for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1343-1351. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa120.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa120
PMID:32869093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647294/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to predict if patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) would develop 10 selected complications. Accurate prediction of complications could help with more targeted measures that would prevent or slow down their development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiments were conducted on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases of California for the period of 2003 to 2011. Recurrent neural network (RNN) long short-term memory (LSTM) and RNN gated recurrent unit (GRU) deep learning methods were designed and compared with random forest and multilayer perceptron traditional models. Prediction accuracy of selected complications were compared on 3 settings corresponding to minimum number of hospitalizations between diabetes diagnosis and the diagnosis of complications.

RESULTS

The diagnosis domain was used for experiments. The best results were achieved with RNN GRU model, followed by RNN LSTM model. The prediction accuracy achieved with RNN GRU model was between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while accuracy of traditional models was between 66% - 76%.

DISCUSSION

The number of hospitalizations was an important factor for the prediction accuracy. Experiments with 4 hospitalizations achieved significantly better accuracy than with 2 hospitalizations. To achieve improved accuracy deep learning models required training on at least 1000 patients and accuracy significantly dropped if training datasets contained 500 patients. The prediction accuracy of complications decreases over time period. Considering individual complications, the best accuracy was achieved on depressive disorder and chronic ischemic heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The RNN GRU model was the best choice for electronic medical record type of data, based on the achieved results.

摘要

目的

我们试图预测 2 型糖尿病(DM2)患者是否会出现 10 种选定的并发症。准确预测并发症有助于采取更有针对性的措施,以预防或减缓其发展。

材料与方法

实验在 2003 年至 2011 年期间对加利福尼亚州医疗保健成本和利用项目州住院患者数据库进行。设计了递归神经网络(RNN)长短期记忆(LSTM)和 RNN 门控循环单元(GRU)深度学习方法,并与随机森林和多层感知器传统模型进行了比较。根据糖尿病诊断和并发症诊断之间的最小住院次数,在 3 种设置下比较了选定并发症的预测准确性。

结果

在诊断领域进行了实验。RNN GRU 模型的结果最佳,其次是 RNN LSTM 模型。RNN GRU 模型的预测准确率在 73%(心肌梗死)和 83%(慢性缺血性心脏病)之间,而传统模型的准确率在 66%-76%之间。

讨论

住院次数是预测准确性的一个重要因素。进行 4 次住院的实验比进行 2 次住院的实验具有显著更高的准确性。为了提高准确性,深度学习模型需要在至少 1000 名患者上进行训练,如果训练数据集包含 500 名患者,则准确性会显著下降。并发症的预测准确性会随时间推移而降低。考虑到个别并发症,在抑郁障碍和慢性缺血性心脏病方面取得了最佳准确性。

结论

基于所取得的结果,RNN GRU 模型是电子病历类型数据的最佳选择。