• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争还是共存?为何相同的对称破缺机制会产生不同的结果。

Compete or Coexist? Why the Same Mechanisms of Symmetry Breaking Can Yield Distinct Outcomes.

机构信息

SynthSys, Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Institute for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburg EH9 3BD, UK.

出版信息

Cells. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):2011. doi: 10.3390/cells9092011.

DOI:10.3390/cells9092011
PMID:32882972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7563139/
Abstract

Cellular morphogenesis is governed by the prepattern based on the symmetry-breaking emergence of dense protein clusters. Thus, a cluster of active GTPase Cdc42 marks the site of nascent bud in the baker's yeast. An important biological question is which mechanisms control the number of pattern maxima (spots) and, thus, the number of nascent cellular structures. Distinct flavors of theoretical models seem to suggest different predictions. While the classical Turing scenario leads to an array of stably coexisting multiple structures, mass-conserved models predict formation of a single spot that emerges via the greedy competition between the pattern maxima for the common molecular resources. Both the outcome and the kinetics of this competition are of significant biological importance but remained poorly explored. Recent theoretical analyses largely addressed these questions, but their results have not yet been fully appreciated by the broad biological community. Keeping mathematical apparatus and jargon to the minimum, we review the main conclusions of these analyses with their biological implications in mind. Focusing on the specific example of pattern formation by small GTPases, we speculate on the features of the patterning mechanisms that bypass competition and favor formation of multiple coexisting structures and contrast them with those of the mechanisms that harness competition to form unique cellular structures.

摘要

细胞形态发生受基于密集蛋白簇的对称破缺出现的预图案控制。因此,在面包酵母中,活跃的 GTPase Cdc42 簇标记了新出现芽的位置。一个重要的生物学问题是哪些机制控制模式极大值(斑点)的数量,从而控制新出现的细胞结构的数量。不同类型的理论模型似乎给出了不同的预测。虽然经典的 Turing 情景导致一系列稳定共存的多个结构,但质量守恒模型预测形成单个斑点,这是通过模式极大值对共同分子资源的贪婪竞争而出现的。这种竞争的结果和动力学都具有重要的生物学意义,但仍未得到充分探索。最近的理论分析在很大程度上解决了这些问题,但它们的结果尚未被广泛的生物学界完全理解。我们尽可能地减少数学工具和术语,在考虑其生物学意义的基础上,回顾这些分析的主要结论。我们以小 GTPase 模式形成的具体示例为重点,推测了规避竞争并有利于形成多个共存结构的模式形成机制的特征,并将其与利用竞争形成独特细胞结构的机制的特征进行了对比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1736/7563139/afe11a2c4d71/cells-09-02011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1736/7563139/9768df2db35c/cells-09-02011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1736/7563139/afe11a2c4d71/cells-09-02011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1736/7563139/9768df2db35c/cells-09-02011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1736/7563139/afe11a2c4d71/cells-09-02011-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Compete or Coexist? Why the Same Mechanisms of Symmetry Breaking Can Yield Distinct Outcomes.竞争还是共存?为何相同的对称破缺机制会产生不同的结果。
Cells. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):2011. doi: 10.3390/cells9092011.
2
Beyond symmetry-breaking: competition and negative feedback in GTPase regulation.超越对称破缺:GTPase 调节中的竞争和负反馈。
Trends Cell Biol. 2013 Oct;23(10):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 31.
3
Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit.负反馈增强了酵母极性建立回路的鲁棒性。
Cell. 2012 Apr 13;149(2):322-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012.
4
Spontaneous cell polarization: Feedback control of Cdc42 GTPase breaks cellular symmetry.自发细胞极化:Cdc42 GTP酶的反馈控制打破细胞对称性。
Bioessays. 2015 Nov;37(11):1193-201. doi: 10.1002/bies.201500077. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex.由Cdc42p鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子-丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶复合物驱动的对称性破缺极化。
Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 25;18(22):1719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.060. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
6
Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front.极性位点之间的竞争在建立独特前沿中的作用。
Elife. 2015 Nov 2;4:e11611. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11611.
7
Interaction between bud-site selection and polarity-establishment machineries in budding yeast.出芽酵母中芽位点选择和极性建立机制之间的相互作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 23;368(1629):20130006. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0006. Print 2013.
8
Particle-based simulations of polarity establishment reveal stochastic promotion of Turing pattern formation.基于粒子的极性建立模拟揭示了图灵模式形成的随机促进。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Mar 12;14(3):e1006016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006016. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
Many roads to symmetry breaking: molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity.通往对称性破缺的多条途径:酵母细胞极性的分子机制与理论模型
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Feb 1;28(3):370-380. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-10-0739.
10
How cells determine the number of polarity sites.细胞如何确定极性位点的数量。
Elife. 2021 Apr 26;10:e58768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58768.

引用本文的文献

1
The Turing heritage for plant biology: all spots and stripes?植物生物学中的图灵遗产:全是斑点和条纹吗?
Quant Plant Biol. 2025 Jan 13;6:e1. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2024.16. eCollection 2025.
2
Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Rho GTPases 对细胞皮层的模式化作用。
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024 Apr;25(4):290-308. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00682-z. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
3
Rho of Plants patterning: linking mathematical models and molecular diversity.植物形态形成中的 Rho 蛋白:连接数学模型和分子多样性。

本文引用的文献

1
How cells determine the number of polarity sites.细胞如何确定极性位点的数量。
Elife. 2021 Apr 26;10:e58768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58768.
2
Wavelength Selection by Interrupted Coarsening in Reaction-Diffusion Systems.反应扩散系统中通过中断粗化进行波长选择
Phys Rev Lett. 2021 Mar 12;126(10):104101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.104101.
3
Fission Yeast Polarization: Modeling Cdc42 Oscillations, Symmetry Breaking, and Zones of Activation and Inhibition.裂殖酵母极性:建模 Cdc42 振荡、对称破缺以及激活和抑制区。
J Exp Bot. 2024 Feb 28;75(5):1274-1288. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad447.
4
Directing Min protein patterns with advective bulk flow.利用平流整体流动来控制 Min 蛋白模式。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 27;14(1):450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35997-0.
5
Spatial models of pattern formation during phagocytosis.吞噬作用过程中模式形成的空间模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 3;18(10):e1010092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010092. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Spatiotemporal development of coexisting wave domains of Rho activity in the cell cortex.细胞皮层中 Rho 活性共存波域的时空发展。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99029-x.
7
How cells determine the number of polarity sites.细胞如何确定极性位点的数量。
Elife. 2021 Apr 26;10:e58768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58768.
8
Symmetry Breaking as an Interdisciplinary Concept Unifying Cell and Developmental Biology.对称性破缺作为统一细胞和发育生物学的交叉学科概念。
Cells. 2021 Jan 7;10(1):86. doi: 10.3390/cells10010086.
9
Patterning and Morphogenesis From Cells to Organisms: Progress, Common Principles and New Challenges.从细胞到生物体的模式形成与形态发生:进展、共同原理及新挑战
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Nov 6;8:602483. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.602483. eCollection 2020.
Cells. 2020 Jul 24;9(8):1769. doi: 10.3390/cells9081769.
4
Cdc42 GTPase regulates ESCRTs in nuclear envelope sealing and ER remodeling.Cdc42 GTPase 在核膜密封和内质网重塑中调节 ESCRTs。
J Cell Biol. 2020 Aug 3;219(8). doi: 10.1083/jcb.201910119.
5
A non-linear system patterns Rab5 GTPase on the membrane.细胞膜上的 Rab5 GTPase 呈现出非线性系统的模式。
Elife. 2020 Jun 8;9:e54434. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54434.
6
Pattern formation mechanisms of self-organizing reaction-diffusion systems.自组织反应扩散系统的模式形成机制。
Dev Biol. 2020 Apr 1;460(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.10.031. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Autoactivation of small GTPases by the GEF-effector positive feedback modules.鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子(GEF)-效应蛋白正反馈模块对小GTP酶的自动激活。
F1000Res. 2019 Sep 23;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20003.1. eCollection 2019.
8
Guiding self-organized pattern formation in cell polarity establishment.在细胞极性建立中引导自组织模式形成。
Nat Phys. 2019 Jul 2;15(3):293-300. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0358-7. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
9
Self-Organization in Pattern Formation.自组织在模式形成中的作用。
Dev Cell. 2019 Jun 3;49(5):659-677. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.019.
10
Small GTPase patterning: How to stabilise cluster coexistence.小 GTPase 模式化:如何稳定簇共存。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213188. eCollection 2019.