University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Feb;73(2):212-222. doi: 10.1002/art.41516. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
OBJECTIVE: To predict response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) prior to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to comprehensively understand the mechanism of how different RA patients respond differently to anti-TNF treatment. METHODS: Gene expression and/or DNA methylation profiling on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), monocytes, and CD4+ T cells obtained from 80 RA patients before they began either adalimumab (ADA) or etanercept (ETN) therapy was studied. After 6 months, treatment response was evaluated according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria for disease response. Differential expression and methylation analyses were performed to identify the response-associated transcription and epigenetic signatures. Using these signatures, machine learning models were built by random forest algorithm to predict response prior to anti-TNF treatment, and were further validated by a follow-up study. RESULTS: Transcription signatures in ADA and ETN responders were divergent in PBMCs, and this phenomenon was reproduced in monocytes and CD4+ T cells. The genes up-regulated in CD4+ T cells from ADA responders were enriched in the TNF signaling pathway, while very few pathways were differential in monocytes. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were strongly hypermethylated in responders to ETN but not to ADA. The machine learning models for the prediction of response to ADA and ETN using differential genes reached an overall accuracy of 85.9% and 79%, respectively. The models using DMPs reached an overall accuracy of 84.7% and 88% for ADA and ETN, respectively. A follow-up study validated the high performance of these models. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that machine learning models based on molecular signatures accurately predict response before ADA and ETN treatment, paving the path toward personalized anti-TNF treatment.
目的:在接受抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)治疗之前预测类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的反应,并全面了解不同 RA 患者对 anti-TNF 治疗反应不同的机制。
方法:对 80 例开始接受阿达木单抗(ADA)或依那西普(ETN)治疗的 RA 患者的外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)、单核细胞和 CD4+T 细胞进行基因表达和/或 DNA 甲基化谱分析。治疗 6 个月后,根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的疾病反应标准评估治疗反应。进行差异表达和甲基化分析,以确定与反应相关的转录和表观遗传特征。使用这些特征,通过随机森林算法构建机器学习模型,在接受 anti-TNF 治疗之前预测反应,并通过后续研究进行验证。
结果:ADA 和 ETN 应答者的 PBMCs 中差异表达的转录本不同,这一现象在单核细胞和 CD4+T 细胞中得到了重现。ADA 应答者 CD4+T 细胞中上调的基因富集在 TNF 信号通路中,而单核细胞中差异很少。在 ETN 应答者中,差异甲基化位置(DMP)强烈超甲基化,但在 ADA 应答者中则不然。使用差异基因预测 ADA 和 ETN 反应的机器学习模型的总体准确性分别达到 85.9%和 79%。使用 DMP 的模型对 ADA 和 ETN 的预测总体准确性分别达到 84.7%和 88%。后续研究验证了这些模型的高性能。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,基于分子特征的机器学习模型可以准确预测 ADA 和 ETN 治疗前的反应,为个性化 anti-TNF 治疗铺平道路。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022-4-11
Inflammopharmacology. 2025-8-12
J Rheum Dis. 2025-7-1
Front Immunol. 2025-3-17
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025-2-1
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018-6-6
Pharmacogenomics. 2017-9
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016-4-21
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014