• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中枢神经系统 (CNS) 药物和老年人的多种药物治疗:英国老龄化纵向研究 (ELSA) 的横断面分析。

Central nervous system (CNS) medications and polypharmacy in later life: cross-sectional analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Keele University, Keele, UK

School of Pharmacy, Keele University, Keele, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 14;10(9):e034346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034346.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034346
PMID:32928845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7490946/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many central nervous system (CNS) medications are considered potentially inappropriate for prescribing in older people; however, these medications are common in polypharmacy (≥5 medicines) regimens. This paper aims to determine the prevalence of CNS drug classes commonly taken by older people. Furthermore, this paper aims to determine whether polypharmacy and other factors, previously found to be associated with overall polypharmacy, are associated with the most common CNS drug classes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (wave 6).

PARTICIPANTS

7730 participants (≥50 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CNS drug classes.

RESULTS

31% of the sample were currently taking ≥5 medications (polypharmacy), of whom 58% (n=1362/2356) were taking CNS medicines as part of their regimen. The most common CNS drug classes in polypharmacy regimens were non-opioid analgesics, opioid analgesics, tricyclic and related antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (34.6%, 13.2%, 10.9% and 10.4%, respectively). Compared with people currently taking 1-4 prescribed medicines, polypharmacy was associated with adjusted ORs of 5.71 (95% CI: 4.29 to 7.61, p<0.01) for opioid analgesics, 3.80 (95% CI: 3.25 to 4.44, p<0.01) for non-opioid analgesics, 3.11 (95% CI: 2.43 to 3.98, p<0.01) for TCAs and 2.30 (95% CI: 1.83 to 2.89, p<0.01) for SSRIs. Lower wealth was also associated with the aforementioned CNS drug classes.

CONCLUSION

Opioid and non-opioid analgesics were the most prevalent classes of CNS medicines in this study. Polypharmacy is strongly associated with the aforementioned classes of analgesics. Polypharmacy is also associated with TCAs and SSRIs, although to a lesser extent than for analgesics. For all CNS medicine classes, polypharmacy may need to be considered in relation to reducing the risk of potential adverse events. After adjustment, lower wealth is associated particularly with analgesics, highlighting that socioeconomic factors may play a role in the prescribing of CNS medicines. These findings provide a baseline for future research into this area.

摘要

目的

许多中枢神经系统 (CNS) 药物被认为不适合老年人开处方;然而,这些药物在多种药物治疗(≥5 种药物)方案中很常见。本文旨在确定老年人常用的 CNS 药物类别。此外,本文旨在确定是否与整体多种药物治疗相关的多药治疗和其他因素与最常见的 CNS 药物类别相关。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

英国老龄化纵向研究(第 6 波)。

参与者

7730 名参与者(≥50 岁)。

主要观察指标

CNS 药物类别的调整后优势比 (OR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。

结果

样本中有 31%的人目前正在服用≥5 种药物(多药治疗),其中 58%(n=1362/2356)正在服用 CNS 药物作为其治疗方案的一部分。多药治疗方案中最常见的 CNS 药物类别是非阿片类镇痛药、阿片类镇痛药、三环和相关抗抑郁药 (TCAs) 和选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 (SSRIs)(分别为 34.6%、13.2%、10.9%和 10.4%)。与目前服用 1-4 种处方药的人相比,多药治疗与阿片类镇痛药的调整后 OR 为 5.71(95%CI:4.29 至 7.61,p<0.01),非阿片类镇痛药为 3.80(95%CI:3.25 至 4.44,p<0.01),三环类抗抑郁药为 3.11(95%CI:2.43 至 3.98,p<0.01),SSRIs 为 2.30(95%CI:1.83 至 2.89,p<0.01)。较低的财富也与上述 CNS 药物类别有关。

结论

阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药是本研究中最常见的 CNS 药物类别。多药治疗与上述类别的镇痛药密切相关。多药治疗也与三环类抗抑郁药和 SSRIs 相关,尽管程度较轻。对于所有 CNS 药物类别,可能需要考虑减少潜在不良事件的风险。调整后,较低的财富与镇痛药尤其相关,这突出表明社会经济因素可能在 CNS 药物的处方中发挥作用。这些发现为该领域的未来研究提供了基础。

相似文献

1
Central nervous system (CNS) medications and polypharmacy in later life: cross-sectional analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).中枢神经系统 (CNS) 药物和老年人的多种药物治疗:英国老龄化纵向研究 (ELSA) 的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 14;10(9):e034346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034346.
2
Secular Trends in Central Nervous System-Active Polypharmacy Among Serial Cross-Sections of US Adults, 2009-2020.2009-2020 年美国成年人系列横剖研究中中枢神经系统活性药物多种用药的长期趋势。
Drugs Aging. 2023 Oct;40(10):941-951. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01066-w. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
Opioids and Other Central Nervous System-Active Polypharmacy in Older Adults in the United States.美国老年人中的阿片类药物及其他中枢神经系统活性多药合用情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Sep;65(9):2052-2056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14930. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Factors associated with polypharmacy in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of data from The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).与初级保健中多药治疗相关的因素:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e020270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020270.
5
Prevalence of Central Nervous System-Active Polypharmacy Among Older Adults With Dementia in the US.美国老年痴呆症患者中枢神经系统活性药物联合使用的流行率。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):952-961. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1195.
6
Examining patterns of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and risk of adverse drug reactions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional UK Biobank study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的多重疾病模式、多药治疗及药物不良反应风险研究:一项英国生物银行横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 14;8(1):e018404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018404.
7
Polypharmacy in patients with epilepsy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.癫痫患者的多种药物治疗:一项全国代表性的横断面研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Oct;111:107261. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107261. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
The impact of high-risk medications on mortality risk among older adults with polypharmacy: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.高风险药物对多药治疗老年人死亡率风险的影响:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的证据。
BMC Med. 2021 Dec 16;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02192-1.
9
Factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in older people with intellectual disability differ from the general population: a cross-sectional observational nationwide study.与智障老年人多重用药和过度多重用药相关的因素与普通人群不同:一项全国性横断面观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010505.
10
Medication taking in a national sample of dependent older people.在全国依赖老年人样本中进行药物治疗。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Mar;16(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of central nervous system-active polypharmacy in a cohort of older adults in Argentina.阿根廷一组老年人中中枢神经系统活性药物联合使用的患病率。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Oct 29;10(6):e190. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.798.
2
Polypharmacy in atrial fibrillation: A prospective analysis of mortality and ischemic stroke using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.心房颤动中的多重用药:使用临床实践研究数据链对死亡率和缺血性卒中进行的前瞻性分析。
J Arrhythm. 2023 Nov 27;40(1):47-56. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12961. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Are there socioeconomic inequalities in polypharmacy among older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人多重用药存在社会经济不平等现象吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03835-z.
4
Drugs utilization profile in England and Wales in the past 15 years: a secular trend analysis.在过去 15 年中英格兰和威尔士的药物利用概况:一项长期趋势分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Sep 16;23(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01853-1.
5
The patterns and implications of potentially suboptimal medicine regimens among older adults: a narrative review.老年人中潜在的次优药物治疗方案的模式及影响:一项叙述性综述
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Jul 4;13:20420986221100117. doi: 10.1177/20420986221100117. eCollection 2022.
6
An Update on Medication Use in Older Adults: a Narrative Review.老年人用药最新情况:叙述性综述
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2021;8(3):108-115. doi: 10.1007/s40471-021-00274-5. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing prevalence and treatment of depression among older people over two decades.二十多年来老年人抑郁症的患病率和治疗情况的变化。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;216(1):49-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.193.
2
Chronic pain: Overlap and specificity in multimorbidity management.慢性疼痛:多种疾病管理中的重叠和特异性。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;48(10):689-692. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-06-19-4966.
3
American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.美国老年医学学会 2019 年更新的老年人潜在不适当药物使用 AGS Beers 标准®。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15767. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Evaluating associations between metabolic health, obesity and depressive symptoms: a prospective analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) with a 2‑year follow‑up.评估代谢健康、肥胖与抑郁症状之间的关联:基于英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)数据的前瞻性分析,随访时间为 2 年。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 28;8(12):e025394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025394.
5
Antidepressant use in older inpatients: current situation and application of the revised STOPP criteria.老年住院患者使用抗抑郁药:现状及修订版STOPP标准的应用
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 May 28;9(8):373-384. doi: 10.1177/2042098618778974. eCollection 2018 Aug.
6
The composition of polypharmacy: A register-based study of Swedes aged 75 years and older.多药疗法的组成:一项针对 75 岁及以上瑞典人的基于登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0194892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194892. eCollection 2018.
7
Factors associated with polypharmacy in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of data from The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).与初级保健中多药治疗相关的因素:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e020270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020270.
8
Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study.英国初级保健中阿片类药物处方的区域变化模式:一项回顾性观察研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;68(668):e225-e233. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695057. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Association between polypharmacy and falls in older adults: a longitudinal study from England.老年人多重用药与跌倒之间的关联:一项来自英国的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e016358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016358.
10
What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions.什么是多重用药?定义的系统综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2.