Department of Health and Physical Activity, College of Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA,
Department of Exercise Physiology, College of Sport Sciences and Physical Activity, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
J Vasc Res. 2020;57(6):355-366. doi: 10.1159/000510294. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
We evaluated the effects of a simulated workday of prolonged sitting on blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) and examined whether posture (seated vs. supine) affected responses. Participants (n = 25) were adults, with overweight/obesity and elevated BP, and performed seated desk work for 7.5 h. BP and PWV were measured in seated and supine postures at baseline (7:15 a.m.), midday (12:05 p.m.), and afternoon (4:45 p.m.). Generalized linear mixed models evaluated the effects of prolonged sitting on BP and PWV within each posture and interactions by posture and sex. In the recommended postures, seated BP and supine carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and carotid-ankle pulse wave velocity (caPWV), but not carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (crPWV), significantly increased over the simulated seated workday (all p < 0.05; effect sizes [d] ranged from 0.25 to 0.44). Whilst no posture-by-time interactions were observed (p > 0.05), BP, caPWV, and crPWV were higher when seated versus supine (main effects of posture p < 0.05; d ranged from 0.30 to 1.04). Exploratory analysis revealed that females had greater seated BP responses (p for interaction <0.05); seated PWV and supine BP and PWV responses were similar by sex (p for interaction >0.05). A simulated workday of prolonged sitting increased seated BP and supine cfPWV and caPWV, and posture minimally influenced these responses. These results add to the evidence suggesting a deleterious effect of prolonged sitting on cardiovascular health.
我们评估了模拟长时间坐姿对血压(BP)和脉搏波速度(PWV)的影响,并研究了姿势(坐姿与仰卧位)是否会影响反应。参与者(n=25)为超重/肥胖和血压升高的成年人,进行了 7.5 小时的坐姿桌面工作。在基线(上午 7:15)、中午(下午 12:05)和下午(下午 4:45),在坐姿和仰卧位测量 BP 和 PWV。广义线性混合模型评估了在每个姿势下长时间坐姿对 BP 和 PWV 的影响,以及姿势和性别的交互作用。在推荐的姿势中,坐姿 BP 和仰卧位颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)和颈踝脉搏波速度(caPWV),但不是颈桡脉搏波速度(crPWV),在模拟坐姿工作日期间显著增加(所有 p<0.05;效应大小[d]范围为 0.25 至 0.44)。虽然没有观察到姿势与时间的交互作用(p>0.05),但与仰卧位相比,BP、caPWV 和 crPWV 在坐姿时更高(姿势的主要影响 p<0.05;d 范围为 0.30 至 1.04)。探索性分析表明,女性的坐姿 BP 反应更大(交互作用的 p<0.05);坐姿 PWV 和仰卧位 BP 和 PWV 反应在性别之间相似(交互作用的 p>0.05)。长时间坐姿的模拟工作日增加了坐姿 BP 和仰卧位 cfPWV 和 caPWV,而姿势对这些反应的影响很小。这些结果增加了证据表明长时间坐姿对心血管健康的有害影响。