Minnesota Department of Health, 85 7th Place East, St. Paul, MN 55101. Email:
ClearWay Minnesota, Bloomington, Minnesota.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Sep 17;17:E107. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200090.
Reducing tobacco-related health disparities has been a public health priority for more than 2 decades, yet disparities in cigarette use have remained steady or worsened. Less is known about how disparities in other tobacco products have changed over time. Our study examined trends in cigarette and other tobacco product use in Minnesota with the goal of informing efforts aimed at reducing disparities.
We examined tobacco use disparities as a function of education, income, and race across the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey results in 2010 (N = 7,057), 2014 (N = 9,304), and 2018 (N = 6,055). Tobacco use was captured by assessing past 30-day use of 4 tobacco products: cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, plus combustibles (ie, cigarettes and/or cigars) and any tobacco (ie, use of any of the 4 products).
At each wave, those with lower income and education reported greater use of cigarettes, combustibles, and any tobacco than those with higher income and education. Black respondents were more likely to report cigar and combustibles use than White respondents in 2018, whereas White respondents were more likely to report smokeless tobacco use in 2014. We saw no significant wave-by-demographic interactions, suggesting that the magnitude of the disparity remained unchanged over time for any tobacco product.
Substantial disparities in tobacco use remain across education, income, and race, even in a state such as Minnesota with a strong tobacco control program. Additional efforts are needed to close disparity gaps and reach endgame tobacco use targets for all subpopulations.
减少与烟草相关的健康差距是过去 20 多年来公共卫生的重点,但吸烟方面的差距仍然保持稳定或恶化。关于其他烟草产品的差距如何随时间变化,人们知之甚少。我们的研究考察了明尼苏达州香烟和其他烟草制品使用的趋势,旨在为旨在减少差距的努力提供信息。
我们研究了明尼苏达州成人烟草调查结果中教育、收入和种族对烟草使用差异的影响,调查时间分别为 2010 年(N=7057)、2014 年(N=9304)和 2018 年(N=6055)。通过评估过去 30 天内对 4 种烟草产品的使用情况来评估烟草使用的差异:香烟、雪茄、电子烟和无烟烟草,以及可燃产品(即香烟和/或雪茄)和任何烟草(即使用上述 4 种产品之一)。
在每个阶段,收入和教育水平较低的人比收入和教育水平较高的人更有可能使用香烟、可燃产品和任何烟草。2018 年,黑人受访者比白人受访者更有可能报告使用雪茄和可燃产品,而 2014 年,白人受访者更有可能报告使用无烟烟草。我们没有发现显著的波次与人口统计学因素的相互作用,这表明在任何烟草产品方面,差距的幅度在一段时间内都没有变化。
即使在明尼苏达州这样有强大的烟草控制计划的州,在教育、收入和种族方面,烟草使用仍然存在很大差距。需要进一步努力缩小差距,实现所有亚人群的最终烟草使用目标。