Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0238128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238128. eCollection 2020.
Genome-editing technology has become increasingly known in recent years, and the 2018 news of genome-edited twins in China had a particularly significant impact on public awareness. In the present study we investigate the effect of Japanese media coverage on public opinions of this technology. To identify the effects we employ a questionnaire survey method on a pre-registered sample from online research company Macromill. Our repeated survey from 2016 through 2019 reveal a generally supportive attitude toward the medical application of genome-editing methods. To see this we employed a multinomial logit analysis examining the determinants of negative and positive impressions of the technology. Results show that although editing for medical purposes remained mostly acceptable, its use in fertilizing human eggs was increasingly rejected, especially in 2019, the most recent sample year. The suggestion is that while genome-editing applications in general medical fields are publicly accepted, its use in human functionality enhancement is heavily increasingly resisted. News of the twin babies in China did raise public awareness of the methods but also damaged their reputation. It therefore is important for genome researchers to hold such concerns in mind, keeping the public informed of changing technology fundamentals. As a related question we inquire into the public acceptability of genome editing for animal and plant breeding, such as in agriculture and fisheries, as well. We find the Japanese public views the medical and breeding applications of this technology to be unconnected with each other, despite that awareness of both has risen significantly in recent years.
近年来,基因编辑技术越来越为人所知,2018 年中国基因编辑双胞胎的新闻尤其引起了公众的关注。本研究调查了日本媒体报道对公众对这项技术的看法的影响。为了确定这些影响,我们采用问卷调查的方法,从在线研究公司 Macromill 获得预先注册的样本。我们从 2016 年到 2019 年进行的重复调查显示,公众普遍支持将基因编辑方法应用于医学。为了验证这一点,我们采用多项逻辑回归分析,考察了对技术的负面和正面印象的决定因素。结果表明,尽管出于医疗目的的编辑仍然大多可以接受,但越来越多的人反对将其用于人类卵子受精,尤其是在 2019 年,即最近的样本年份。这表明,虽然一般医学领域的基因编辑应用得到公众的认可,但在人类功能增强方面的应用却受到强烈抵制。中国双胞胎婴儿的消息确实提高了公众对这些方法的认识,但也损害了它们的声誉。因此,基因组研究人员有必要牢记这些问题,让公众了解不断变化的技术基础。作为一个相关的问题,我们调查了公众对动物和植物基因编辑的接受程度,如农业和渔业。我们发现,尽管近年来公众对这两种技术的认识都有了显著提高,但日本公众认为这项技术的医学和繁殖应用彼此没有关联。