Suppr超能文献

飞机座位分配中的社交距离。

Social distancing in airplane seat assignments.

作者信息

Salari Mostafa, Milne R John, Delcea Camelia, Kattan Lina, Cotfas Liviu-Adrian

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

David D. Reh School of Business, Clarkson University, 333 B.H. Snell Hall, Potsdam, NY, 13699, USA.

出版信息

J Air Transp Manag. 2020 Oct;89:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101915. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Abstract

This paper addresses the airplane passengers' seat assignment problem while practicing social distancing among passengers. We proposed a mixed integer programming model to assign passengers to seats on an airplane in a manner that will respect two types of social distancing. One type of social distancing refers to passengers being seated far enough away from each other. The metric for this type of social distancing is how many passengers are seated so close to each other as to increase the risk of infection. The other type of social distancing refers to the distance between seat assignments and the aisle. That distance influences the health risk involved in passengers and crew members walking down the aisle. Corresponding metrics for both health risks are included in the objective function. To conduct simulation experiments, we define different scenarios distinguishing between the relative level of significance of each type of social distancing. The results suggest the seating assignments that best serve the intention of the scenarios. We also reformulate the initial model to determine seat assignments that maximize the number of passengers boarding an airplane while practicing social distancing among passengers. In the last part of this study, we compare the proposed scenarios with the recommended middle-seat blocking policy presently used by some airlines to keep social distancing among passengers. The results show that the proposed scenarios can provide social distancing among seated passengers similar to the middle-seat blocking policy, while reducing the number of passengers seated close to the aisle of an airplane.

摘要

本文探讨了在飞机乘客之间保持社交距离的情况下飞机乘客座位分配问题。我们提出了一个混合整数规划模型,以便以尊重两种社交距离的方式为飞机上的乘客分配座位。一种社交距离是指乘客彼此之间要坐得足够远。这种社交距离的衡量标准是有多少乘客坐得彼此很近,从而增加感染风险。另一种社交距离是指座位分配与过道之间的距离。该距离会影响乘客和机组人员在过道行走时所涉及的健康风险。目标函数中包含了这两种健康风险的相应衡量标准。为了进行模拟实验,我们定义了不同的场景,区分每种社交距离的相对重要程度。结果表明了最符合各场景意图的座位分配方式。我们还重新制定了初始模型,以确定在保持乘客之间社交距离的同时能使登机乘客数量最大化的座位分配方案。在本研究的最后部分,我们将所提出的场景与一些航空公司目前采用的推荐中间座位封锁政策进行比较,以保持乘客之间的社交距离。结果表明,所提出的场景能够在就座乘客之间提供与中间座位封锁政策类似的社交距离,同时减少靠近飞机过道就座的乘客数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c82/7486076/c900131d05e4/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Social distancing in airplane seat assignments.
J Air Transp Manag. 2020 Oct;89:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101915. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
2
Health risks of airplane boarding methods with apron buses when some passengers disregard safe social distancing.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0271544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271544. eCollection 2022.
3
Airplane Boarding Methods that Reduce Risk from COVID-19.
Saf Sci. 2020 Oct 26:105061. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105061.
4
Evaluation of Boarding Methods Adapted for Social Distancing When Using Apron Buses.
IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 11;8:151650-151667. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015736. eCollection 2020.
5
Adapting the reverse pyramid airplane boarding method for social distancing in times of COVID-19.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0242131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242131. eCollection 2020.
6
Seat Assignments With Physical Distancing in Single-Destination Public Transit Settings.
IEEE Access. 2021 Mar 10;9:42985-42993. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065298. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Factors Affecting the Sustainable Success of Airlines During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):350-379. doi: 10.1177/03611981221104462. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
A distributionally robust optimization approach for airline integrated recovery under in-flight pandemic transmission risks.
Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2023 Jul;152:104188. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104188. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
A qualitative analysis of social and emotional perspectives of airline passengers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Air Transp Manag. 2021 Jul;94:102079. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102079. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Social distancing and revenue management-A post-pandemic adaptation for railways.
Omega. 2023 Jan;114:102737. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102737. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
5
Recovery of Chinese low-cost carriers after the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic.
J Air Transp Manag. 2022 Oct;105:102282. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102282. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Human mobility behavior in COVID-19: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102916. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102916. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Seat Assignments With Physical Distancing in Single-Destination Public Transit Settings.
IEEE Access. 2021 Mar 10;9:42985-42993. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065298. eCollection 2021.
9
The operation of labour charter flights during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
Case Stud Transp Policy. 2022 Mar;10(1):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Passenger, airline, and policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis: The case of South Korea.
J Air Transp Manag. 2022 Jan;98:102144. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102144. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Survey of Enabling and Emerging Technologies for Social Distancing-Part I: Fundamentals and Enabling Technologies.
IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 20;8:153479-153507. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018140. eCollection 2020.
2
COVID-19 and airline employment: Insights from historical uncertainty shocks to the industry.
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100123. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior.
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Impact of social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic on crime in Los Angeles and Indianapolis.
J Crim Justice. 2020 May-Jun;68:101692. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101692. Epub 2020 May 1.
6
Adolescents' Motivations to Engage in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Mental and Social Health.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;67(2):179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Challenges in the Practice of Sexual Medicine in the Time of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom.
J Sex Med. 2020 Jul;17(7):1229-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
9
Exercise and Fitness in the Age of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul-Aug;8(7):2152-2155. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.039. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
The effect of uncontrolled travelers and social distancing on the spread of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Colombia.
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 May-Jun;35:101699. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101699. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验