• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于家庭的整体体力活动促进干预:来自家庭报告每一步健康(FRESH)试验性随机对照试验的结果。

A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: findings from the families reporting every step to health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit and Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Norwich Medical School and Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Sep 22;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01025-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-020-01025-3
PMID:32962724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7510101/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of FRESH (Families Reporting Every Step to Health), a theory-based child-led family physical activity (PA) intervention delivered online. We also assessed the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes of interest and whether pre-specified criteria were met to progress to a full-scale definitive trial.

METHODS

In a three-armed randomised pilot trial, 41 families (with a 7-11-year-old index child) were allocated to a: 'family' (FAM), 'pedometer-only' (PED), or a no-treatment control (CON) arm. The FAM arm received access to the FRESH website, allowing participants to select step challenges to 'travel' to target cities around the world, log their steps, and track progress as families virtually globetrot. FAM and PED arms also received family sets of pedometers. All family members could participate in the evaluation. Physical (e.g., fitness, blood pressure), psychosocial (e.g., social support), behavioural (e.g., objectively-measured PA), and economic (e.g., expenditure for PA) data were collected at baseline, 8- and 52-weeks.

RESULTS

At 8- and 52-weeks, 98 and 88% of families were retained, respectively. Most children liked participating in the study (> 90%) and thought it was fun (> 80%). Compared to the PED (45%) and CON (39%) arms, a higher percentage of children in the FAM (81%) arm reported doing more activities with their family. Adults agreed that FRESH encouraged their family do more PA and made their family more aware of the amount of PA they do. No notable between-group differences were found for childrens' minutes in moderate-to-vigorous PA. Sizeable changes of 9.4 (95%CI: 0.4, 18.4) and 15.3 (95%CI: 6.0, 24.5) minutes in moderate-to-vigorous PA was found for adults in the FAM group compared to those in the PED or CON groups, respectively. No other notable differences were found.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates feasibility and acceptability of the FRESH intervention. All progression criteria were at least partially satisfied. However, we failed to recruit the target sample size and did not find a signal of effectiveness on PA particularly long-term or in children. Further refinements are required to progress to a full-scale trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was prospectively registered ( ISRCTN12789422 ) on 16/03/2016.

摘要

简介

本研究评估了基于理论的儿童主导家庭体育活动(PA)干预措施 FRESH(家庭报告每一步健康)在线实施的可行性和可接受性。我们还评估了干预措施对感兴趣结果的初步有效性,以及是否满足了预先设定的标准,以推进到全面的确定性试验。

方法

在一项三臂随机试点试验中,41 个家庭(有 7-11 岁的索引儿童)被分配到“家庭”(FAM)、“计步器仅”(PED)或无治疗对照(CON)臂。FAM 臂可访问 FRESH 网站,允许参与者选择前往世界各地目标城市的挑战,记录他们的步数,并随着家庭虚拟环球旅行跟踪进度。FAM 和 PED 臂还收到了家庭计步器。所有家庭成员都可以参与评估。收集了身体(例如,健康、血压)、心理社会(例如,社会支持)、行为(例如,客观测量的 PA)和经济(例如,PA 支出)数据,基线、8 周和 52 周。

结果

在 8 周和 52 周时,分别有 98%和 88%的家庭保留下来。大多数孩子喜欢参与研究(>90%),并认为这很有趣(>80%)。与 PED(45%)和 CON(39%)臂相比,FAM(81%)臂中有更高比例的儿童报告与家人一起进行了更多的活动。成年人同意 FRESH 鼓励他们的家人进行更多的 PA 活动,并使他们的家人更了解他们所进行的 PA 活动量。在儿童的中到剧烈 PA 分钟数方面,未发现组间有明显差异。与 PED 或 CON 组相比,FAM 组的成年人分别发现中到剧烈 PA 有 9.4(95%CI:0.4,18.4)和 15.3(95%CI:6.0,24.5)分钟的大幅变化。未发现其他明显差异。

结论

本研究表明 FRESH 干预措施具有可行性和可接受性。所有进展标准至少部分得到满足。然而,我们未能招募到目标样本量,并且没有发现 PA 特别是长期或在儿童中的有效性信号。需要进一步改进才能推进到全面试验。

试验注册

本研究于 2016 年 3 月 16 日前瞻性注册(ISRCTN81534536)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b8/7510101/af27ec7c2e7e/12966_2020_1025_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b8/7510101/af27ec7c2e7e/12966_2020_1025_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87b8/7510101/af27ec7c2e7e/12966_2020_1025_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: findings from the families reporting every step to health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial.基于家庭的整体体力活动促进干预:来自家庭报告每一步健康(FRESH)试验性随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Sep 22;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01025-3.
2
The development and feasibility of a randomised family-based physical activity promotion intervention: the Families Reporting Every Step to Health (FRESH) study.一项基于家庭的随机身体活动促进干预措施的开发与可行性研究:“健康每一步家庭报告”(FRESH)研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 9;5:21. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0408-7. eCollection 2019.
3
Whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: the Families Reporting Every Step to Health pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.基于家庭的整体身体活动促进干预:家庭报告每一步健康计划随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e030902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030902.
4
5
A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT.基于计步器的 45 至 75 岁人群行走干预,有无执业护士支持:PACE-UP 三臂群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(37):1-274. doi: 10.3310/hta22370.
6
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.为患有慢性疾病的不活跃成年人的运动推荐计划添加基于网络的行为支持:e-coachER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(63):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta24630.
7
Multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme and home-based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 years and over in primary care.一项多中心整群随机试验,比较社区团体锻炼计划、居家锻炼与常规护理对基层医疗中65岁及以上老年人的效果。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(49):vii-xxvii, 1-105. doi: 10.3310/hta18490.
8
A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial.一项由初级护理护士实施的针对老年人的步行干预措施:PACE(计步器加速计咨询评估)-Lift群组随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 17;12(2):e1001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783. eCollection 2015 Feb.
9
Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial.一项针对45至75岁人群、有或无护士支持的初级保健步行干预对身体活动水平的影响:计步器与咨询评估(PACE-UP)整群随机临床试验
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 3;14(1):e1002210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health', a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years.一项随机对照试验,评估“健康家庭”项目的有效性和成本效益。该项目是一种针对6至11岁儿童的基于家庭的社区肥胖治疗干预措施。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta21010.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver Experiences of a Peer Mentor Family Physical Activity Programme in England: A Qualitative Interview Study.英国同伴导师家庭体育活动计划中的照顾者体验:一项定性访谈研究
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70053. doi: 10.1111/cch.70053.
2
Exercise Individually or as a Collective Family Activity? A Semi-Experimental Comparison on the Increase in Subjective Vitality and Happiness.单独锻炼还是作为家庭集体活动?关于主观活力和幸福感提升的半实验比较
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 31;17:6229-6239. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S493261. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of a parent-focused intervention targeting 24-hour movement behaviours in preschool-aged children: a randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Becoming a parent: A systematic review and meta-analysis of changes in BMI, diet, and physical activity.为人父母:BMI、饮食和体力活动变化的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2020 Apr;21(4):e12959. doi: 10.1111/obr.12959. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
2
Whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: the Families Reporting Every Step to Health pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.基于家庭的整体身体活动促进干预:家庭报告每一步健康计划随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e030902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030902.
3
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adolescents: model development and illustration using two exemplar interventions.
针对学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为的以家长为中心的干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 9;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01650-2.
4
Effectiveness of utilizing step-monitoring devices to prevent and treat obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利用步数监测设备预防和治疗儿童及青少年肥胖症的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 14;10:20552076241272589. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272589. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Efficacy of physical activity shared between parents and children to improve sports initiation in the M.A.M.I.deporte® program.父母与子女共同参与体育活动对提高M.A.M.I.deporte®项目中运动参与度的效果。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Mar 26;6:1372664. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1372664. eCollection 2024.
6
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康干预措施对促进儿童和青少年身体活动的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 21;26:e41649. doi: 10.2196/41649.
7
Web-based need-supportive parenting program to promote physical activity in secondary school students: a randomized controlled pilot trial.基于网络的支持需求型亲职教育方案对促进中学生身体活动的随机对照试验:一项先导性研究
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):1627. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16528-4.
8
Experience and Satisfaction with a Family-Based Physical Activity Intervention Using Activity Trackers and Apps: A Qualitative Study.基于活动追踪器和应用程序的家庭体育活动干预的经验和满意度:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;20(4):3327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043327.
9
Do physical activity interventions combining self-monitoring with other components provide an additional benefit compared with self-monitoring alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis.体育活动干预措施结合自我监测与其他组成部分是否比单纯自我监测更有额外益处?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;56(23):1366-1374. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105198. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Feasibility of using activity trackers and apps to increase physical activity in whole families: The Step it Up Family intervention.使用活动追踪器和应用程序增加全家庭身体活动的可行性:“行动起来家庭”干预措施
Digit Health. 2022 Oct 6;8:20552076221129083. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129083. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
青少年身体活动干预的成本效益:使用两种范例干预进行模型开发和说明。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e027566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027566.
4
Family Physical Activity Planning and Child Physical Activity Outcomes: A Randomized Trial.家庭体育活动计划与儿童身体活动效果:一项随机试验
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials.试验需要参与者,但不需要他们的反馈?对已发表的关于测量临床试验参与者体验的文献进行的范围综述。
Trials. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3444-y.
6
The development and feasibility of a randomised family-based physical activity promotion intervention: the Families Reporting Every Step to Health (FRESH) study.一项基于家庭的随机身体活动促进干预措施的开发与可行性研究:“健康每一步家庭报告”(FRESH)研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 9;5:21. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0408-7. eCollection 2019.
7
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
8
Behavioral determinants of physical activity across the life course: a "DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity" (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review.一生的身体活动行为决定因素:“饮食与身体活动决定因素”(DEDIPAC)综合系统文献综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 2;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0510-2.
9
Promoting Parent and Child Physical Activity Together: Elicitation of Potential Intervention Targets and Preferences.促进家长和孩子一起进行身体活动:潜在干预目标和偏好的引出。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;45(1):112-123. doi: 10.1177/1090198117704266. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
The moderating effect of psychosocial factors in the relation between neighborhood walkability and children's physical activity.社会心理因素在邻里步行便利性与儿童身体活动关系中的调节作用。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Dec 9;13(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0452-0.