SDSU/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug;36(6):1352-1371. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1824280. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Poor sleep quality is related to worse neurocognition in older adults and in people with HIV (PWH); however, many previous studies have relied only on self-report sleep questionnaires, which are inconsistently correlated with objective sleep measures. We examined relationships between objective and subjective sleep quality and neurocognition in persons with and without HIV, aged 50 and older. Eighty-five adults (PWH = 52, HIV-negative = 32) completed comprehensive neuropsychological testing to assess global and domain-specific neurocognition. Objective sleep quality was assessed with wrist actigraphy (total sleep time, efficiency, sleep fragmentation) for five to 14 nights. Subjective sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Objective and subjective sleep measures were unrelated ('s > 0.30). Compared to HIV-negative participants, PWH had greater sleep efficiency (80% vs. 75%, = 0.05) and were more likely to be using prescription and/or over the counter sleep medication ( = 0.04). In the whole sample, better sleep efficiency ( < 0.01) and greater total sleep time ( = 0.05) were associated with better learning. Less sleep fragmentation was associated with better learning ( < 0.01) and recall ( = 0.04). While PWH had slightly stronger relationships between total sleep time and sleep fragmentation, it is not clear if these differences are clinically meaningful. Better subjective sleep quality was associated with better executive function ( < 0.01) and working memory ( = 0.05); this relationship was primarily driven by the HIV-negative group. Objective sleep quality was associated with learning and recall whereas subjective sleep quality was associated with executive function and working memory. Therefore, assessing objective and subjective sleep quality could be clinically useful, as they are both related to important domains of cognition frequently impacted in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders as well as neurodegenerative disorders associated with aging. Future studies should evaluate if behavioral sleep interventions can improve neurocognition.
睡眠质量差与老年人和 HIV 感染者(PWH)的神经认知能力下降有关;然而,许多先前的研究仅依赖于自我报告的睡眠问卷,这些问卷与客观的睡眠测量结果不一致。我们研究了 50 岁及以上有和没有 HIV 的人群中,客观和主观睡眠质量与神经认知之间的关系。85 名成年人(PWH=52,HIV 阴性=32)完成了全面的神经心理测试,以评估整体和特定领域的神经认知。使用腕部动作计(总睡眠时间、效率、睡眠碎片化)评估 5 至 14 晚的客观睡眠质量。使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评估主观睡眠质量。客观和主观睡眠测量结果不相关('s>0.30)。与 HIV 阴性参与者相比,PWH 的睡眠效率更高(80%对 75%,=0.05),更有可能使用处方和/或非处方睡眠药物(=0.04)。在整个样本中,更好的睡眠效率(<0.01)和更长的总睡眠时间(=0.05)与更好的学习能力相关。更少的睡眠碎片化与更好的学习(<0.01)和回忆(=0.04)相关。虽然 PWH 之间总睡眠时间和睡眠碎片化之间的关系稍强,但尚不清楚这些差异是否具有临床意义。更好的主观睡眠质量与更好的执行功能(<0.01)和工作记忆(=0.05)相关;这种关系主要是由 HIV 阴性组驱动的。客观睡眠质量与学习和回忆相关,而主观睡眠质量与执行功能和工作记忆相关。因此,评估客观和主观睡眠质量可能具有临床意义,因为它们都与 HIV 相关的神经认知障碍以及与衰老相关的神经退行性疾病中经常受到影响的重要认知领域有关。未来的研究应评估行为睡眠干预是否可以改善神经认知。