Department of Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Department of Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Sleep Health. 2018 Apr;4(2):209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
The integration of methods to assess daytime physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) and nighttime sleep would allow the evaluation of 24-hour daily activity using a single device. Accelerometer devices used to assess daytime PA have not been substantially validated to evaluate sleep. The objective of this study was to use polysomnography (PSG) to validate a commonly used PA accelerometer worn on both wrists and the hip.
Seventeen participants (50-75years) completed a single-night in-home PSG recording while concurrently wearing 3 PA accelerometers. Accelerometer devices were worn on each wrist and the hip. Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were compared for each device against PSG. Correlation coefficients estimated measurement agreement. Paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots assessed measurement differences.
Between PSG and devices, mean TST ranged from 361.6 to 403.2minutes. Mean SE estimates ranged from 86.9% to 96.9%. Mean WASO estimates ranged from 12 to 51.2minutes. For TST, SE, and WASO hip estimates differed significantly from PSG estimates (paired t tests, TST: P=.03, SE: P<.001, WASO: P< .001). No significant differences were found between wrist accelerometers and PSG estimates of TST, SE, or WASO.
PA accelerometer devices worn on either wrist provide valid estimates of TST, WASO, and SE when compared with PSG. Further studies are needed to investigate methods to improve assessment of sleep parameters by PA accelerometer devices to advance device integration and assessment 24-hour activity in populations.
将评估日间体力活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)以及夜间睡眠的方法相结合,使用单个设备即可评估 24 小时日常活动。用于评估日间 PA 的加速度计设备尚未经过大量验证来评估睡眠。本研究的目的是使用多导睡眠图(PSG)来验证通常戴在手腕和臀部的两个手腕和一个臀部的 PA 加速度计。
17 名参与者(50-75 岁)在进行了一晚上的家庭 PSG 记录,同时佩戴了 3 个 PA 加速度计。加速度计设备分别戴在每个手腕和臀部。与 PSG 相比,比较了每个设备的总睡眠时间(TST)、睡眠效率(SE)和睡眠后醒来时间(WASO)。相关系数估计了测量一致性。配对 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 图评估了测量差异。
PSG 和设备之间,TST 的平均值范围为 361.6 至 403.2 分钟。SE 的平均估计值范围从 86.9%到 96.9%。WASO 的平均估计值范围从 12 到 51.2 分钟。对于 TST、SE 和 WASO,臀部估计值与 PSG 估计值差异显著(配对 t 检验,TST:P=0.03,SE:P<.001,WASO:P<.001)。手腕加速度计与 PSG 估计的 TST、SE 或 WASO 之间未发现显著差异。
与 PSG 相比,戴在任一手腕上的 PA 加速度计设备可以提供 TST、WASO 和 SE 的有效估计值。需要进一步研究来探讨通过 PA 加速度计设备改善睡眠参数评估的方法,以推进设备集成和人群 24 小时活动评估。