• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public.毛细血管全血 IgG-IgM COVID-19 自测试剂盒作为一种适用于普通大众的 SARS-CoV-2 感染血清学筛查工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240779. eCollection 2020.
2
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of a rapid immunochromatographic test with a chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG.快速免疫层析法与化学发光免疫分析法检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 的比较。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Oct 15;30(3):030901. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.030901.
4
Evaluation of the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serological tools and their positioning in COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.评估严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测工具的性能及其在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)诊断策略中的定位。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;98(4):115181. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115181. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的抗体检测及动态特征。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1930-1934. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461.
6
Analysis of adjunctive serological detection to nucleic acid test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosis.分析辅助血清学检测在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染诊断中的应用。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Sep;86:106746. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106746. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速血清学检测和SARS-CoV-2实时聚合酶链反应检测:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e19152. doi: 10.2196/19152.
8
Evaluation of three immunochromatographic tests for rapid detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.三种免疫层析检测方法快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的评价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;39(12):2289-2297. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04010-7. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Rapid Determination of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a bedside, point-of-Care, serological test.使用床边即时检验,快速测定 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):2212-2221. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1826892.
10
Evaluations of the serological test in the diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections during the COVID-19 outbreak.新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染的血清学检测在 COVID-19 疫情期间的诊断评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;39(12):2271-2277. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03978-6. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of self-sampling and self-testing for infections: a rapid systematic review on public users' views.感染自我采样和自我检测的可接受性:关于公众用户观点的快速系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21773-w.
2
Feasibility of home-based ELISA capillary blood self-testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.居家酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测抗新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体的可行性。
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Aug;31:e00290. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00290. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to rapid COVID-19 antigen self-tests: A cross-sectional survey.印度尼西亚普通民众对快速 COVID-19 抗原自我检测的价值观和偏好:一项横断面调查。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 May;27(5):522-536. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13748. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among high-density communities and hyper-endemicity of COVID-19 in Vietnam.越南高人口密度社区中 SARS-CoV-2 的血清流行率和 COVID-19 的高度流行。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 May;27(5):515-521. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13744. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
University population-based prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunity (SARSSURV-ULiège): a study protocol.基于大学人群的SARS-CoV-2感染与免疫前瞻性队列研究(SARSSURV-列日大学):研究方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):e055721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055721.
6
Evaluation of the Practicability of Biosynex Antigen Self-Test COVID-19 AG+ for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein from Self-Collected Nasal Mid-Turbinate Secretions in the General Public in France.评估Biosynex新冠抗原自检试剂AG+在法国普通民众中用于检测自采鼻中道分泌物中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白的实用性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;11(12):2217. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122217.
7
Feasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at home.家庭自测进行大规模 SARS-CoV-2 检测的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89236-x.
8
Self-testing for HIV, HBV, and HCV using finger-stick whole-blood multiplex immunochromatographic rapid test: A pilot feasibility study in sub-Saharan Africa.使用指尖全血多重免疫层析快速检测进行 HIV、HBV 和 HCV 自我检测:撒哈拉以南非洲的一项试点可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 9;16(4):e0249701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249701. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Usability and Acceptability of Home-based Self-testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antibodies for Population Surveillance.基于家庭的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体自我检测用于人群监测的可用性和可接受性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):e384-e393. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1178.
2
Evaluation of the COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test from Orient Gene Biotech.东方基因 COVID-19 抗体(IgG/IgM)联合检测试剂盒的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01233-20.
3
Alltest rapid lateral flow immunoassays is reliable in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection from 14 days after symptom onset: A prospective single-center study.Alltest 快速侧向流动免疫分析在症状出现后 14 天即可可靠诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104473. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104473. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
'Self-collected upper respiratory tract swabs for COVID-19 test': A feasible way to increase overall testing rate and conserve resources in South Africa.“自我采集用于新冠病毒检测的上呼吸道拭子”:提高南非总体检测率并节约资源的可行方法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 May 28;12(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2445.
5
Smartphone-Based Self-Testing of COVID-19 Using Breathing Sounds.基于智能手机利用呼吸声进行新冠病毒自我检测
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Oct;26(10):1202-1205. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0114. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
Potential pitfalls of routine SARS-CoV-2 serology for mass screening.
J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2345. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26034. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic.与严重冠状病毒感染相关的精神和神经精神症状表现:一项系统综述和荟萃分析,并与新冠疫情进行比较
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):611-627. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0. Epub 2020 May 18.
8
A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.用于检测人类 SARS-CoV-2 血清转化的血清学检测方法。
Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):1033-1036. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0913-5. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Serological Approaches for COVID-19: Epidemiologic Perspective on Surveillance and Control.血清学方法在新冠病毒中的应用:监测与控制的流行病学视角。
Front Immunol. 2020 Apr 24;11:879. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00879. eCollection 2020.
10
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2.解读新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)诊断检测结果
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259.

毛细血管全血 IgG-IgM COVID-19 自测试剂盒作为一种适用于普通大众的 SARS-CoV-2 感染血清学筛查工具。

Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public.

机构信息

Ecole Doctorale Régionale D'Afrique Centrale en Infectiologie Tropicale, Franceville, Gabon.

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Kisangani, Kisangani, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240779. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240779
PMID:33057446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561138/
Abstract

The practicability of a prototype capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test (Exacto® COVID-19 self-test, Biosynex Swiss SA, Freiburg, Switzerland) as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public was evaluated in a cross-sectional, general adult population study performed between April and May 2020 in Strasbourg, France, consisting of face-to-face, paper-based, semi-structured, and self-administrated questionnaires. Practicability was defined as the correct use of the self-test and the correct interpretation of the result. The correct use of self-test was conditioned by the presence of the control band after 15-min of migration. The correct interpretation of the tests was defined by the percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results coded by the numbers and verified by trained observers. A total of 167 participants (52.7% female; median age, 35.8 years; 82% with post-graduate level) were enrolled, including 83 and 84 for usability and test results interpretation substudies, respectively. All participants (100%; 95% CI: 95.6-100) correctly used the self-test. However, 12 (14.5%; 95% CI: 8.5-23.6) asked for verbal help. The percent agreement between the tests results read and interpret by the participants compared to the expected results was 98.5% (95% CI: 96.5-99.4). However, misinterpretation occurred in only 2.3% of positive and 1.2% of invalid test results. Finally, all (100%) participants found that performing the COVID-19 self-test was easy; and 98.8% found the interpretation of the self-test results easy. Taken together, these pilot observations demonstrated for the first-time, high practicability and satisfaction of COVID-19 self-testing for serological IgG and IgM immune status, indicating its potential for use by the general public to complete the arsenal of available SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in the urgent context of the COVID-19 epidemic.

摘要

一种用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的血清学 IgG 和 IgM 免疫状态检测的毛细血管全血 COVID-19 自我检测试剂盒(Exacto® COVID-19 自我检测试剂盒,Biosynex Swiss SA,Freiburg,瑞士)的实用性评估,该研究是在 2020 年 4 月至 5 月间在法国斯特拉斯堡进行的横断面、一般成年人群研究中进行的,该研究采用面对面、纸质、半结构化和自我管理的问卷调查。实用性定义为自我检测的正确使用和结果的正确解读。自我检测的正确使用取决于 15 分钟迁移后是否出现对照带。测试结果的正确解读定义为参与者读取和解释测试结果与预期结果的百分比一致,这些预期结果是由编码数字和经过培训的观察者验证的。共纳入 167 名参与者(52.7%为女性;中位年龄为 35.8 岁;82%具有研究生学历),分别有 83 名和 84 名参与者参加了可用性和测试结果解释亚研究。所有参与者(100%;95%CI:95.6-100)均正确使用了自我检测试剂盒。然而,有 12 名(14.5%;95%CI:8.5-23.6)参与者要求口头帮助。参与者读取和解释测试结果与预期结果的百分比一致性为 98.5%(95%CI:96.5-99.4)。然而,仅在 2.3%的阳性和 1.2%的无效测试结果中出现错误解读。最后,所有(100%)参与者都认为进行 COVID-19 自我检测很容易;98.8%的参与者认为自我检测结果的解释很容易。综上所述,这些初步观察结果首次表明 COVID-19 自我检测在血清 IgG 和 IgM 免疫状态方面具有很高的实用性和满意度,表明其有可能被公众用于在 COVID-19 疫情的紧急情况下补充现有的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法。