Suppr超能文献

自由泳中负荷-速度剖面分析的可靠性

Reliability of Load-Velocity Profiling in Front Crawl Swimming.

作者信息

Olstad Bjørn Harald, Gonjo Tomohiro, Njøs Nikolai, Abächerli Kathrin, Eriksrud Ola

机构信息

Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 23;11:574306. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574306. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to establish test-retest reliability of calculating load-velocity profiles in front crawl swimming using five and three different external loads, and if outcome results were comparable between calculation methods for monitoring performance over time. Fifteen swimmers at either national or international competition level (seven females and eight males) participated in this study. The subjects performed 25 m of semi-tethered swimming with maximal effort with five progressive loads (females 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 kg and males 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 kg) as well as 50 m maximal front crawl on 2 different days. The mean velocity during three stroke cycles in mid-pool was calculated and plotted as a function of the external load. Relationship between the load and velocity was expressed by a linear regression line and established for each swimmer. The intercepts between the axes of the plot and the established regression line were defined as theoretical maximum velocity (V) and load (L). In addition, L was also expressed as a percentage of body mass (rL). The coefficient of determination (R) and the slope (S) of the linear load-velocity relationship were calculated. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥0.902) for all variables. The coefficient of variation was ≤3.14% and typical error was rated as "good" in all variables. A difference was found between day 1 and 2 in V for three- and five-load calculations and for 50 m front crawl time ( < 0.05). No difference was found between the load-velocity profile outcomes variables compared between the three- and five-trial protocols on neither day 1 nor 2. The Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias across all resistance conditions for five loads, L: 0.04 kg, rL: 0.13%, V: -0.03 m/s, and S: 0.003 -m/s/kg and for three loads, L: -0.24 kg, rL: -0.27%, V: -0.04 m/s, S: 0.002 -m/s/kg. In conclusion, the load-velocity profile for front crawl swimming can be calculated with high reliability from both five and three external loads and comparable results in outcome variables were established. These methods can be used to monitor performance parameters over time, and to investigate and compare swimmers' velocity and strength capabilities to allow for individualized training prescription to improve performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定使用五种和三种不同外部负荷计算自由泳划水的负荷 - 速度曲线的重测信度,以及随着时间推移监测成绩时,不同计算方法的结果是否具有可比性。15名国家或国际比赛水平的游泳运动员(7名女性和8名男性)参与了本研究。受试者在两天内分别进行了五次递增负荷(女性为1、2、3、4和5千克,男性为1、3、5、7和9千克)的25米半 tethered 最大努力游泳以及50米最大自由泳。计算了泳池中部三个划水周期的平均速度,并将其绘制为外部负荷的函数。负荷与速度之间的关系用线性回归线表示,并为每位游泳运动员建立。图的轴与建立的回归线之间的截距定义为理论最大速度(V)和负荷(L)。此外,L也表示为体重的百分比(rL)。计算了线性负荷 - 速度关系的决定系数(R)和斜率(S)。组内相关系数(ICC)对所有变量显示出极好的一致性(ICC≥0.902)。变异系数≤3.14%,所有变量的典型误差被评为“良好”。在第一天和第二天之间,对于三次和五次负荷计算以及50米自由泳时间的V值存在差异(<0.05)。在第一天和第二天,三次和五次试验方案之间比较的负荷 - 速度曲线结果变量之间均未发现差异。布兰德 - 奥特曼图显示,对于五种负荷,在所有阻力条件下存在小偏差,L:0.04千克,rL:0.13%,V: - 0.03米/秒,S:0.003米/秒/千克;对于三种负荷,L: - 0.24千克,rL: - 0.27%,V: - 0.04米/秒,S:0.002米/秒/千克。总之,自由泳的负荷 - 速度曲线可以通过五种和三种外部负荷可靠地计算出来,并且在结果变量方面建立了可比的结果。这些方法可用于随时间监测成绩参数,并研究和比较游泳运动员的速度和力量能力,以制定个性化训练方案来提高成绩。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验