Suppr超能文献

测试模态和叙述风格对肺癌治疗决策辅助工具中患者信息使用的影响。

Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients' Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):990-1002. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20960436. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients' information processing and use of audiovisual and narrative information of an early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer treatment decision aid explaining surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We further investigated differences between older and younger patients.

METHODS

We conducted a 2 (modality: textual v. audiovisual) × 2 (narration style: factual v. narrative) online experiment among cancer patients and survivors ( = 305; = 62.42, SD 11.68 y). Age was included as a potential modifier: younger (<65 y) versus older (≥65 y) age. We assessed 1) perceived cognitive load, 2) satisfaction with information, 3) comprehension, 4) information recall, and 5) decisional conflict. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Irrespective of patient age, audiovisual information (compared with textual information) led to lower perceived cognitive load, higher satisfaction with information, and lower decisional conflict (subscale Effective Decision). Narrative information (compared with factual information) led to reduced decisional conflict (subscale Uncertainty) but only in younger patients. Combining audiovisual information with factual information also resulted in lower perceived cognitive load in younger patients as compared with older patients.

LIMITATIONS

Patients who actually face the decision, especially older patients, might be more motivated to process our decision-aid information than the present study participants who responded to a hypothetical situation online.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing participants with audiovisual information, irrespective of their age, improved their processing and use of information in a decision aid. Narratives did not clearly benefit information processing.

摘要

背景

患者决策辅助工具(PDA)中的风险信息通常让老年患者难以理解。提供视听和叙述信息可能会增强对健康相关信息的理解和使用。我们研究了一种早期非小细胞肺癌治疗决策辅助工具,该工具解释手术和立体定向消融放疗,为患者提供视听和叙述信息对信息处理和使用的影响。我们进一步研究了老年患者和年轻患者之间的差异。

方法

我们在癌症患者和幸存者中进行了一项 2(模式:文字 v. 视听)×2(叙述风格:事实 v. 叙述)的在线实验(n = 305;年龄中位数为 62.42 岁,SD = 11.68 岁)。年龄作为一个潜在的调节因素包括在内:年龄<65 岁(年轻)与年龄≥65 岁(年老)。我们评估了 1)感知认知负荷,2)对信息的满意度,3)理解程度,4)信息回忆,5)决策冲突。采用方差分析进行数据分析。

结果

无论患者年龄大小,视听信息(与文字信息相比)导致感知认知负荷降低、对信息的满意度提高和决策冲突降低(有效决策子量表)。叙述信息(与事实信息相比)降低了决策冲突(不确定性子量表),但仅在年轻患者中。与年老患者相比,在年轻患者中,将视听信息与事实信息相结合也会导致感知认知负荷降低。

局限性

与实际面临决策的患者相比,尤其是老年患者,本研究的参与者在线回答假设情境时,处理我们的决策辅助信息的动机可能较低。

结论

为参与者提供视听信息,无论其年龄大小,都可以改善他们在决策辅助工具中对信息的处理和使用。叙述并没有明显改善信息处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d1e/7675778/cddf95c68d7c/10.1177_0272989X20960436-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验