• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健专业人员智能手机影响量表的开发与验证

Development and validation of a Smartphone Impact Scale among healthcare professionals.

作者信息

Altamimi Tahani N, Alex Johnson, Khan Moizuddin M, Nair Binu V S

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, KSA.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail, KSA.

出版信息

J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Aug 21;15(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.009. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.009
PMID:33132811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7564985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Smartphone overuse is prevalent among healthcare professionals. There is no standard scale that can measure the impact of smartphone usage on healthcare professionals. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool, the Smartphone Impact Scale (SIS), that can effectively measure the use of smartphone among healthcare professionals.

METHODS

We developed a generic instrument to study the impact of smartphone usage among healthcare professionals. A total of 1436 healthcare professionals from various regions of KSA participated in this study through an online questionnaire-based survey. The psychometric properties of the SIS were developed using content validity index (CVI), factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analysis.

RESULTS

A 23-item scale was selected for reliability and validity analysis. The average CVI was found to be 0.824. The internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha value was 0.91, and test-retest reliability was 0.85. The Cronbach's alpha values for Factors 1 and 2 were 0.875 and 0.803, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis indices were as follows: root mean square of approximation = 0.0710, comparative fit index = 0.861, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.845, and the coefficient of determination = 0.969. The correlation between two factors was 0.66. After factor analysis, we developed a final questionnaire with 23 items.

CONCLUSIONS

Our SIS showed a three-factor structure and appropriate psychometric characteristics. Due to its adequate reliability and validity, SIS can be conveniently used to evaluate the impact of smartphone usage on healthcare professionals.

摘要

目的

智能手机过度使用在医疗保健专业人员中很普遍。目前尚无能够衡量智能手机使用对医疗保健专业人员影响的标准量表。本研究旨在开发并验证一种工具——智能手机影响量表(SIS),该量表能够有效测量医疗保健专业人员对智能手机的使用情况。

方法

我们开发了一种通用工具来研究智能手机使用对医疗保健专业人员的影响。来自沙特阿拉伯王国不同地区的1436名医疗保健专业人员通过基于在线问卷的调查参与了本研究。使用内容效度指数(CVI)、因子分析、内部一致性和重测信度分析来确定SIS的心理测量特性。

结果

选择了一个包含23个条目的量表进行信效度分析。发现平均CVI为0.824。Cronbach's α值的内部一致性为0.91,重测信度为0.85。因子1和因子2的Cronbach's α值分别为0.875和0.803。验证性因子分析指标如下:近似均方根=0.0710,比较拟合指数=0.861,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.845,决定系数=0.969。两个因子之间的相关性为0.66。经过因子分析,我们编制了一份最终包含23个条目的问卷。

结论

我们的SIS显示出三因素结构和适当的心理测量特征。由于其具有足够的信效度,SIS可方便地用于评估智能手机使用对医疗保健专业人员的影响。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Smartphone Impact Scale among healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员智能手机影响量表的开发与验证
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Aug 21;15(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.009. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Revised Colorectal Cancer Perception and Screening Instrument among First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China.中国结直肠癌患者一级亲属中修订版结直肠癌认知与筛查工具的翻译、改编及验证
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Mar 30;7(2):180-189. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_6_20. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
3
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study.中文版抑郁-焦虑-压力量表 21 项(DASS-21)在健康专业人员样本中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 26;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07514-4.
4
Psychometric properties of the Breast Cancer Awareness Measurement among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study.中文版女性乳腺癌认知测量量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e035911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035911.
5
Developing and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Brief Adolescent Respiratory System Health Assessment Scale-Student Version in a Chinese Sample.在中国样本中开发并测试青少年呼吸系统健康简易评估量表-学生版的有效性和可靠性。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 17;9:713066. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713066. eCollection 2021.
6
The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Smartphone Impact Scale.智能手机影响量表土耳其语版本的信度和效度。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Mar;46(1):84-91. doi: 10.1177/01632787221097703. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
The Internal Reliability and Construct Validity of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ): Evidence from Healthcare Professionals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.基于证据的实践问卷(EBPQ)的内部信度和结构效度:来自东地中海地区医疗保健专业人员的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(15):2168. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152168.
8
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a Professional Identity Scale for Healthcare Students and Professionals.医学生和医疗专业人员职业认同量表中文版的编制与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):451. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040451.
9
Readiness to change for interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Development and validation of a theory-based instrument.医疗保健领域跨专业协作的变革意愿:一种基于理论的工具的开发与验证
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1448371. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
The validity and reliability of Persian version of smartphone addiction questionnaire in Iran.智能手机成瘾问卷波斯文版在伊朗的有效性和可靠性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Sep 17;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00407-5.

引用本文的文献

1
College students' attachment to their smartphones: a subjective operant approach.大学生对智能手机的依恋:一种主观操作性方法。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 8;10(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00857-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of smartphone-based instant messaging services in medical practice: a cross-sectional study.智能手机即时通讯服务在医疗实践中的应用:一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2020 Jan-Feb;138(1):86-92. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0010.R1.28032020.
2
Use of smartphone and perception towards the usefulness and practicality of its medical applications among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医护人员对智能手机的使用情况及其医疗应用的有用性和实用性的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4523-1.
3
The Use of Smart Devices by Care Providers in Emergency Departments: Cross-Sectional Survey Design.
医护人员在急诊科使用智能设备的情况:横断面调查设计。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 5;7(6):e13614. doi: 10.2196/13614.
4
Cell phone etiquette in the clinical arena: A professionalism imperative for healthcare.临床环境中的手机礼仪:医疗行业的职业素养要求
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2019 Apr;49(4):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.理解模型大小对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
The Psychology of Smartphone: The Development of the Smartphone Impact Scale (SIS).智能手机心理学:智能手机影响量表(SIS)的开发。
Assessment. 2020 Sep;27(6):1176-1197. doi: 10.1177/1073191119831788. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
7
Development and Validation Study of the Internet Overuse Screening Questionnaire.网络过度使用筛查问卷的开发与验证研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Apr;15(4):361-369. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.09.27.2. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Social media usage among health care providers.医疗保健提供者对社交媒体的使用情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 29;10(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2993-y.
9
Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: Towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use.适用于西班牙语和法语的智能手机成瘾量表简版:迈向问题性手机使用的跨文化研究。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
The relationship between smartphone use and subjective musculoskeletal symptoms and university students.智能手机使用与主观肌肉骨骼症状之间的关系及大学生
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):575-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.575. Epub 2015 Mar 31.