The endoscopic predictors of status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

OBJECTIVE

The endoscopic findings associated with -naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification.

DATA SOURCES

The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from October 1999 to October 2019.

METHODS

A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled diagnostic accuracy calculations for each of the studied endoscopic findings. Diagnostic odds ratios and sensitivity and specificity characteristics were calculated to identify significant predictors of status.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis included 4380 patients in 15 studies. The most significant predictor of an -naïve status was a regular arrangement of collecting venules (diagnostic odds ratio 55.0, sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.8%). Predictors of active infection were mucosal oedema (18.1, 63.7%, 91.1%) and diffuse redness (14.4, 66.5%, 89.0%). Map-like redness had high specificity for previous eradication (99.0%), but poor specificity (13.0%).

CONCLUSION

The regular arrangement of collecting venules, mucosal oedema, diffuse redness and map-like redness are important endoscopic findings for determining status. This meta-analysis provides a tentative basis for developing future endoscopic classification systems.