• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring Gratitude in Germany: Validation Study of the German Version of the Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Item Form (GQ-6-G) and the Multi-Component Gratitude Measure (MCGM-G).在德国测量感恩之情:感恩问卷六项版德文版(GQ-6-G)和多成分感恩量表(MCGM-G)的效度研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:590108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590108. eCollection 2020.
2
The Multi-Component Gratitude Measure in Spanish for youth: An adaptation of the MCGM in Colombia.面向青少年的西班牙语多成分感恩量表:哥伦比亚对多成分感恩量表的改编。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 22;8(12):e12560. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12560. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Evaluation of the Gratitude Questionnaire in a Chinese Sample of Adults: Factorial Validity, Criterion-Related Validity, and Measurement Invariance Across Sex.感恩问卷在中国成年人样本中的评估:因子效度、效标关联效度以及性别间的测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 1;8:1498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01498. eCollection 2017.
4
Longitudinal and Gender Measurement Invariance of the Gratitude Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents.中文青少年感恩问卷的纵向和性别测量不变性。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Dec;125(6):3209-3223. doi: 10.1177/00332941211036015. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
5
The psychometric properties of the 5-item gratitude questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.中文版5项感恩问卷在中国青少年中的心理测量学特性。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 May;24(4):203-210. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12372.
6
Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire in Filipino Secondary School Students.菲律宾中学生感恩问卷的验证
Span J Psychol. 2017 Oct 11;20:E45. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.51.
7
Assessing the Measurement Invariance of the Gratitude Questionnaire-5 in Chinese and American Adolescents.评估感恩问卷-5 在中美青少年中的测量不变性。
Span J Psychol. 2021 Mar 22;24:e17. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.19.
8
Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6) with a Chilean sample of adults and high schoolers.对感恩问卷(GQ-6)西班牙语译本在智利成年人及高中生样本中的效度验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 31;14:53. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0450-6.
9
Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6)-Exploring Psychometric Properties in India.感激问卷(GQ-6)——在印度的心理测量学特性研究。
J Relig Health. 2021 Oct;60(5):3716-3731. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01419-y. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Arabic version of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-4) in a sample of non-clinical adults.非临床成年样本中感恩问卷阿拉伯语版(GQ-4)的效度验证
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 20;13(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02441-5.
2
Adaptation and combination of two scales to measure dispositional gratitude in health sciences faculty: a psychometric analysis.两种用于测量健康科学教师特质感恩的量表的改编与组合:一项心理测量分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06773-z.
3
Gratitude practice helps undergraduates who experienced an earthquake in China find meaning in life.感恩练习帮助经历过中国地震的大学生找到生活的意义。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61256-3.
4
Heartfulness in Vegans, Vegetarians, and Omnivores.纯素者、素食者和杂食者的正念。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064943.
5
The Multi-Component Gratitude Measure in Spanish for youth: An adaptation of the MCGM in Colombia.面向青少年的西班牙语多成分感恩量表:哥伦比亚对多成分感恩量表的改编。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 22;8(12):e12560. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12560. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Validation of the revised Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12R) and its measurement invariance across the US and Germany.修订后的复合心理资本量表(CPC - 12R)的验证及其在美国和德国的测量不变性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1075031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1075031. eCollection 2022.
7
Gratitude Moderates the Relation between Daily Hassles and Satisfaction with Life in University Students.感恩能缓和大学生日常困扰与生活满意度之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):13005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413005.
8
The Moderation Effects of Comparative Thinking Between Gratitude and Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Outbreak.新冠疫情期间比较性思维在感恩与消极情绪之间的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 23;12:644323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644323. eCollection 2021.
9
Gratitude Questionnaire-20 Items (G20): A Cross-Cultural, Psychometric and Crowdsourcing Analysis.感恩问卷-20项(G20):跨文化、心理测量与众包分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 21;11:626330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.626330. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R.R语言中(跨文化)多组不变性检验可能性入门
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 18;10:1507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507. eCollection 2019.
2
Measuring Gratitude: A Comparative Validation of the Dutch Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ6) and Short Gratitude, Resentment, and Appreciation Test (SGRAT).感恩的测量:荷兰感恩问卷(GQ6)与简短感恩、怨恨和欣赏测试(SGRAT)的比较验证
Psychol Belg. 2015 May 15;55(1):19-31. doi: 10.5334/pb.bd.
3
Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire in Filipino Secondary School Students.菲律宾中学生感恩问卷的验证
Span J Psychol. 2017 Oct 11;20:E45. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.51.
4
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health.普遍的幸福?评估积极心理健康的量表的跨文化测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):408-421. doi: 10.1037/pas0000353. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6) with a Chilean sample of adults and high schoolers.对感恩问卷(GQ-6)西班牙语译本在智利成年人及高中生样本中的效度验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 31;14:53. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0450-6.
7
Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues.跨文化数据的均值与协方差结构(MACS)分析:实践与理论问题
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jan 1;32(1):53-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.
8
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据:原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Gratitude: prompting behaviours that build relationships.感恩:促进关系的行为。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(1):2-13. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.561297. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
[The usefulness of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) in psychotherapeutic patients].[简明症状量表18项版(BSI-18)在心理治疗患者中的效用]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2011 Feb;61(2):82-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270518. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

在德国测量感恩之情:感恩问卷六项版德文版(GQ-6-G)和多成分感恩量表(MCGM-G)的效度研究

Measuring Gratitude in Germany: Validation Study of the German Version of the Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Item Form (GQ-6-G) and the Multi-Component Gratitude Measure (MCGM-G).

作者信息

Hudecek Matthias F C, Blabst Nicole, Morgan Blaire, Lermer Eva

机构信息

University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:590108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590108. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590108
PMID:33154732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7586006/
Abstract

The Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Item Form (GQ-6; McCullough et al., 2002) is a well-established instrument for measuring gratitude. Recently, the Multi-Component Gratitude Measure (MCGM) was developed as a more holistic approach (Morgan et al., 2017). While the GQ-6 mainly focuses on the emotional component of gratitude, the MCGM encompasses conceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral aspects. As of today, there is no validated German measure for gratitude. In order to close that research gap, the present study focused on validating the German versions of the GQ-6 (GQ-6-G) and of the MCGM (MCGM-G). In addition, multi-group comparisons were conducted to test for cultural measurement invariance. Construct validity was tested similar to original validation studies of the two scales focusing on affect, well-being, empathy, anxiety and depression. The online survey was completed in random order by 508 participants. The one-factor model of the GQ-6-G and the hierarchical structure of the MCGM-G could be replicated. However, the model fit of the Gratitude Questionnaire was significantly better after eliminating one item (GQ-5-G). Multi-group comparisons revealed cultural measurement invariance was established for the GQ-5-G and partial measurement invariance for five of six factors of the MCGM-G, respectively. Reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency for both instruments, and measures for criterion-related and discriminant validity have shown hypothesized relationships. Thus, the GQ-5-G and the MCGM-G are two instruments with good reliability and validity for measuring gratitude in Germany.

摘要

感恩问卷六项版(GQ - 6;麦卡洛等人,2002年)是一种成熟的感恩测量工具。最近,多成分感恩量表(MCGM)作为一种更全面的方法被开发出来(摩根等人,2017年)。虽然GQ - 6主要关注感恩的情感成分,但MCGM涵盖了概念、态度和行为方面。截至目前,还没有经过验证的德语感恩测量工具。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究专注于验证GQ - 6(GQ - 6 - G)和MCGM(MCGM - G)的德语版本。此外,还进行了多组比较以检验文化测量不变性。构建效度的测试类似于这两个量表最初的验证研究,重点关注情感、幸福感、同理心、焦虑和抑郁。508名参与者以随机顺序完成了在线调查。GQ - 6 - G的单因素模型和MCGM - G的层次结构能够被复制。然而,在剔除一个项目(GQ - 5 - G)后,感恩问卷的模型拟合度显著提高。多组比较显示,GQ - 5 - G建立了文化测量不变性,MCGM - G的六个因素中有五个建立了部分测量不变性。信度分析表明这两种工具都具有良好的内部一致性,与标准相关的效度和区分效度的测量结果显示出了假设的关系。因此,GQ - 5 - G和MCGM - G是在德国测量感恩具有良好信度和效度的两种工具。