Hudecek Matthias F C, Blabst Nicole, Morgan Blaire, Lermer Eva
University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Munich, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:590108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590108. eCollection 2020.
The Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Item Form (GQ-6; McCullough et al., 2002) is a well-established instrument for measuring gratitude. Recently, the Multi-Component Gratitude Measure (MCGM) was developed as a more holistic approach (Morgan et al., 2017). While the GQ-6 mainly focuses on the emotional component of gratitude, the MCGM encompasses conceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral aspects. As of today, there is no validated German measure for gratitude. In order to close that research gap, the present study focused on validating the German versions of the GQ-6 (GQ-6-G) and of the MCGM (MCGM-G). In addition, multi-group comparisons were conducted to test for cultural measurement invariance. Construct validity was tested similar to original validation studies of the two scales focusing on affect, well-being, empathy, anxiety and depression. The online survey was completed in random order by 508 participants. The one-factor model of the GQ-6-G and the hierarchical structure of the MCGM-G could be replicated. However, the model fit of the Gratitude Questionnaire was significantly better after eliminating one item (GQ-5-G). Multi-group comparisons revealed cultural measurement invariance was established for the GQ-5-G and partial measurement invariance for five of six factors of the MCGM-G, respectively. Reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency for both instruments, and measures for criterion-related and discriminant validity have shown hypothesized relationships. Thus, the GQ-5-G and the MCGM-G are two instruments with good reliability and validity for measuring gratitude in Germany.
感恩问卷六项版(GQ - 6;麦卡洛等人,2002年)是一种成熟的感恩测量工具。最近,多成分感恩量表(MCGM)作为一种更全面的方法被开发出来(摩根等人,2017年)。虽然GQ - 6主要关注感恩的情感成分,但MCGM涵盖了概念、态度和行为方面。截至目前,还没有经过验证的德语感恩测量工具。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究专注于验证GQ - 6(GQ - 6 - G)和MCGM(MCGM - G)的德语版本。此外,还进行了多组比较以检验文化测量不变性。构建效度的测试类似于这两个量表最初的验证研究,重点关注情感、幸福感、同理心、焦虑和抑郁。508名参与者以随机顺序完成了在线调查。GQ - 6 - G的单因素模型和MCGM - G的层次结构能够被复制。然而,在剔除一个项目(GQ - 5 - G)后,感恩问卷的模型拟合度显著提高。多组比较显示,GQ - 5 - G建立了文化测量不变性,MCGM - G的六个因素中有五个建立了部分测量不变性。信度分析表明这两种工具都具有良好的内部一致性,与标准相关的效度和区分效度的测量结果显示出了假设的关系。因此,GQ - 5 - G和MCGM - G是在德国测量感恩具有良好信度和效度的两种工具。