Sohail Muhammad U, Al-Mansoori Layla, Al-Jaber Hend, Georgakopoulos Costas, Donati Francesco, Botrè Francesco, Sellami Maha, Elrayess Mohamed A
Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Anti-Doping Laboratory Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 15;11:600888. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.600888. eCollection 2020.
Circulating cytokines and oxidative stress markers vary in response to different exercise regimens. This study aims to compare the immune-inflammatory and oxidative stress profiles of elite athletes from different sport disciplines as potential biomarkers of muscle damage, and cardiovascular demand.
Serum samples from 88 consented elite male athletes from different sports disciplines (aquatics, = 11, athletics, = 22, cycling, = 19, football, = 28 and weightlifting, = 8) collected at the anti-doping lab in Italy were screened for 38 cytokines and oxidative stress markers. Comparisons were made between different level of power, cardiovascular demand (CD) and endurance, as well as among the sport types.
The anti-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-10 was higher ( = 0.04) in moderate power compared with the high power group. Conversely, superoxide dismutase (SOD; = 0.001) and malondialdehyde (MDA; = 0.007) levels were greater in the higher power groups compared with the lower power counterpart. Among athletes who belong to different CD ranks, IL-1β and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP1) levels were higher ( = 0.03) in the low CD-rank group compared with high CD counterpart, whereas, SOD levels were higher ( = 0.001) in high and moderate CD-rank groups compared to low counterpart. For endurance groups, IL-10 and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1beta were increased ( = 0.03) in low/moderate endurance compared with the high endurance group. Finally, MIP1-beta, SOD and catalase varied significantly among the sports groups.
Specific markers of inflammation and oxidative stress are associated with different sports disciplines and could be utilized as potential biomarkers of athletes' health, performance, and recovery from injury.
循环细胞因子和氧化应激标志物会因不同的运动方案而有所变化。本研究旨在比较来自不同运动项目的精英运动员的免疫炎症和氧化应激特征,将其作为肌肉损伤和心血管需求的潜在生物标志物。
在意大利的反兴奋剂实验室收集了88名来自不同运动项目(游泳,n = 11;田径,n = 22;自行车,n = 19;足球,n = 28;举重,n = 8)且同意参与研究的精英男性运动员的血清样本,对其中38种细胞因子和氧化应激标志物进行筛查。对不同功率水平、心血管需求(CD)和耐力水平之间以及不同运动类型之间进行了比较。
与高功率组相比,中等功率组的抗炎白细胞介素(IL)-10水平更高(P = 0.04)。相反,与低功率组相比,高功率组的超氧化物歧化酶(SOD;P = 0.001)和丙二醛(MDA;P = 0.007)水平更高。在属于不同CD等级的运动员中,与高CD等级组相比,低CD等级组的IL-1β和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP1)水平更高(P = 0.03),而与低CD等级组相比,高CD等级组和中等CD等级组的SOD水平更高(P = 0.001)。对于耐力组,与高耐力组相比,低/中等耐力组的IL-10和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白(MIP)-1β增加(P = 0.03)。最后,MIP1-β、SOD和过氧化氢酶在不同运动组之间有显著差异。
炎症和氧化应激的特定标志物与不同的运动项目相关,可作为运动员健康、表现和损伤恢复的潜在生物标志物。