Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Namgu, 42415, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76961-y.
Inhaler education for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients improves inhaler technique and adherence. However, the effects of such education on the quality of life and inhaler satisfaction remain unclear. Here, we evaluated inhaler handling and adherence, and changes in quality of life and inhaler satisfaction, after repeated education for COPD patients. We prospectively enrolled COPD patients who had used inhalers for over 1 month and evaluated the effects of repeated education. Three visits were made over 6 months; an advanced practice nurse evaluated inhaler technique and adherence, and instructed the patients in inhaler technique during face-to-face sessions. Inhaler technique and adherence were assessed at every visits, and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) test, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler questionnaire (FSI-10) were administered before (visit 1) and after two educational sessions (visit 3). A total of 261 COPD patients (308 inhalers) were included. Education significantly reduced the proportion of critical errors after two educational sessions (visit 3), from 43.2 to 8.8% (p < 0.001). The proportion of highly compliant patients increased after two visits, from 81.6% to 87.7% (p = 0.005). The FSI-10 score improved significantly after education, from 44.36 ± 4.69 to 47.64 ± 4.08 (p < 0.001); the scores on the other instruments (mMRC, CAT, EQ-5D, and PHQ-9) did not improve. Repeated face-to-face inhaler education by an advanced practice nurse significantly improved inhaler satisfaction, technique, and adherence. However, inhaler education did not significantly improve quality of life.
对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行吸入器教育可改善吸入器技术和依从性。然而,这种教育对生活质量和吸入器满意度的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们评估了 COPD 患者在反复教育后的吸入器处理和依从性,以及生活质量和吸入器满意度的变化。我们前瞻性地招募了使用吸入器超过 1 个月的 COPD 患者,并评估了重复教育的效果。在 6 个月内进行了 3 次访问;一名高级执业护士评估了吸入器技术和依从性,并在面对面会议上指导患者使用吸入器技术。每次访问都评估吸入器技术和依从性,并在两次教育课程之前(访问 1)和之后(访问 3)进行改良医学研究委员会(mMRC)测试、COPD 评估测试(CAT)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和吸入器满意度问卷(FSI-10)。共纳入 261 例 COPD 患者(308 例吸入器)。经过两次教育课程后,关键错误的比例从 43.2%显著降低到 8.8%(p<0.001)。两次就诊后,高度依从性患者的比例从 81.6%增加到 87.7%(p=0.005)。教育后 FSI-10 评分显著提高,从 44.36±4.69 提高到 47.64±4.08(p<0.001);其他量表(mMRC、CAT、EQ-5D 和 PHQ-9)的评分没有改善。高级执业护士通过面对面的吸入器教育可以显著提高吸入器满意度、技术和依从性。然而,吸入器教育并没有显著提高生活质量。