From the Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anesth Analg. 2020 Dec;131(6):1708-1720. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005023.
During hyperinflammatory conditions that can occur in acute critical illness, such as shock or hypoperfusion, inflammatory mediators activate the endothelium, fueling a proinflammatory host-response as well as procoagulant processes. These changes result in shedding of the glycocalyx, endothelial hyperpermeability, edema formation, and lead to disturbed microcirculatory perfusion and organ failure. Different fluid strategies that are used in shock may have differential effects on endothelial integrity. Collectively, low protein content fluids seem to have negative effects on the endothelial glycocalyx, aggravating endothelial hyperpermeability, whereas fluids containing albumin or plasma proteins may be superior to normal saline in protecting the glycocalyx and endothelial barrier function. Targeting the endothelium may be a therapeutic strategy to limit organ failure, which hitherto has not received much attention. Treatment targets aimed at restoring the endothelium should focus on maintaining glycocalyx function and/or targeting coagulation pathways or specific endothelial receptors. Potential treatments could be supplementing glycocalyx constituents or inhibiting glycocalyx breakdown. In this review, we summarize mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction during acute critical illness, such as the systemic inflammatory response, shedding of the glycocalyx, endothelial activation, and activation of coagulation. In addition, this review focuses on the effects of different fluid strategies on endothelial permeability. Also, potential mechanisms for treatment options to reduce endothelial hyperpermeability with ensuing organ failure are evaluated. Future research is needed to elucidate these pathways and to translate these data to the first human safety and feasibility trials.
在急性危重病中可能发生的过度炎症状态下,如休克或低灌注,炎症介质激活内皮细胞,引发促炎宿主反应和促凝过程。这些变化导致糖萼脱落、内皮通透性增加、水肿形成,并导致微循环灌注紊乱和器官衰竭。休克中使用的不同液体策略可能对内皮完整性产生不同的影响。总的来说,低蛋白含量的液体似乎对内皮糖萼有负面影响,加重内皮通透性增加,而含有白蛋白或血浆蛋白的液体在保护糖萼和内皮屏障功能方面可能优于生理盐水。针对内皮可能是限制器官衰竭的一种治疗策略,但迄今为止尚未得到太多关注。旨在恢复内皮功能的治疗靶点应集中在维持糖萼功能和/或靶向凝血途径或特定的内皮受体上。潜在的治疗方法可以是补充糖萼成分或抑制糖萼分解。在这篇综述中,我们总结了急性危重病期间内皮功能障碍的机制,如全身炎症反应、糖萼脱落、内皮激活和凝血激活。此外,本文还重点介绍了不同液体策略对内皮通透性的影响。还评估了潜在的治疗选择,以减少内皮通透性增加和随之发生的器官衰竭的机制。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些途径,并将这些数据转化为首次人体安全性和可行性试验。