Li Jinzhi, Li Xiuchuan, Jiang Jie, Xu Xuexue, Wu Jing, Xu Yuanyuan, Lin Xin, Hall John, Xu Huashan, Xu Jincheng, Xu Xiaoyue
Department of Nursing, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 30;11:580827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.580827. eCollection 2020.
As a public health emergency of international concern, the COVID-19 outbreak has had a tremendous impact on patients' psychological health. However, studies on psychological interventions in patients with COVID-19 are relatively rare. This study examined the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in relieving patients' psychological distress during the COVID-19 epidemic. Ninety-three eligible participants selected by cluster sampling were randomized to an intervention group ( = 47) and a control group ( = 46). Participants in the control group received routine treatment according to the Chinese Management Guidelines for COVID-19, while participants in the intervention group received routine treatment with additional CBT. The Chinese Version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety, and stress for all participants at baseline and post-intervention. Two-sided test, and proportion tests were used to examine the differences between the intervention and control group for each DASS-21 indicator. Univariate linear regression was used to examine the association between chronic disease status and change in each DASS-21 indicator after intervention. Two-way scatter plots were generated to show the association of the length of hospital stay and the changes of each DASS-21 indicator by intervention and control groups. Significant decreases in means were found for scales of depression, anxiety, stress and total DASS-21 in both intervention ( < 0.001) and control group ( = 0.001), with participants in the intervention group having a bigger reduction in means. After the intervention, more participants in the intervention group had no depression or anxiety symptoms than in the control group, but no statistical differences were found ( > 0.05). Compared with participants with chronic disease, participants with no chronic disease had a significantly larger reduction of total DASS-21 scale (coefficient = -4.74, 95% CI: -9.31; -0.17).The length of hospital stay was significantly associated with a greater increase in anxiety scale in the intervention group ( = 0.005), whilst no significant association was found in the control group ( = 0.29). The patients with COVID-19 experienced high levels of anxiety, depression and stress. Our study result highlights the effectiveness of CBT in improving the psychological health among patients with COVID-19, also suggests that CBT should be focused on patients with chronic disease and those who have longer hospital stays. These results have important implications in clinical practice in improving psychological health in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. ISRCTN68675756. Available at: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN68675756.
作为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件,新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情对患者的心理健康产生了巨大影响。然而,关于COVID-19患者心理干预的研究相对较少。本研究探讨了认知行为疗法(CBT)在缓解COVID-19疫情期间患者心理困扰方面的有效性。通过整群抽样选取93名符合条件的参与者,随机分为干预组(n = 47)和对照组(n = 46)。对照组参与者按照《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行)》接受常规治疗,而干预组参与者在接受常规治疗的基础上还接受了CBT。采用中文版抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(DASS-21)在基线和干预后对所有参与者的抑郁、焦虑和压力进行评估。采用双侧检验和比例检验来检验干预组和对照组在每个DASS-21指标上的差异。采用单因素线性回归分析干预后慢性病状态与每个DASS-21指标变化之间的关联。生成双向散点图以显示干预组和对照组住院时间长度与每个DASS-21指标变化之间的关联。干预组(P < 0.001)和对照组(P = 0.001)的抑郁、焦虑、压力量表及DASS-21总分均值均显著下降,且干预组参与者的均值下降幅度更大。干预后,干预组无抑郁或焦虑症状的参与者比对照组多,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与患有慢性病的参与者相比,无慢性病的参与者DASS-21总分量表的下降幅度显著更大(系数 = -4.74,95%CI:-9.31;-0.17)。干预组的住院时间长度与焦虑量表的更大增加显著相关(P = 0.005),而对照组未发现显著关联(P = 0.29)。COVID-19患者经历了高水平的焦虑、抑郁和压力。我们的研究结果突出了CBT在改善COVID-19患者心理健康方面的有效性,也表明CBT应关注慢性病患者和住院时间较长的患者。这些结果对于在COVID-19大流行背景下改善心理健康的临床实践具有重要意义。国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN68675756。可在:http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN68675756获取。