Health Promotion and Health Behavior Program, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 May 24;23(6):909-919. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa231.
This study compared tobacco use and cessation for African Americans (AA), Asians/Pacific Islanders (API), Hispanics/Latinos (H/L), American Indian/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN), and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) in the United States to California (CA), the state with the longest continually funded tobacco control program. The purpose of this study was to identify tobacco use disparities across racial/ethnic groups across time.
Cigarette use prevalence (uptake and current use), consumption (mean number of cigarettes smoked per day [CPD]), and quit ratios were calculated across survey years, and trends were examined within each race/ethnic group and comparing between CA and the United States, utilizing the 1992-2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey.
Prevalence decreased for all race/ethnic groups. Current use among CA NHW showed significant decline compared with US counterparts, whereas US H/L showed greater decline than CA counterparts. CPD decreased by approximately 30% across race/ethnic groups, with CA groups having lower numbers. The greatest decrease occurred among AA in CA (average 10.3 CPD [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.3, 12.6] in 1992/1993 to 3 CPD [95% CI: 2.4, 3.7] in 2018/2019). Quit ratios increased from 1992/1993 to 2018/2019 for CA H/L 52.4% (95% CI: 49.8, 53.0) to 59.3 (95% CI: 55.8, 62.5) and CA NHWs 61.5% (95% CI: 60.7, 61.9) to 63.8% (95% CI: 63.9, 66.9).
Although overall prevalence decreased over time for each racial/ethnic group, declines in CA outpaced the United States only for NHWs. Reductions in CPD were encouraging but the quit ratio points to the need to increase tobacco control efforts toward cessation.
The successes in reduced cigarette use uptake and prevalence across time for both California and the rest of the United States were observed largely among non-Hispanic White populations. Although reductions in the number of cigarettes smoked per day are a notable success, particularly among the Californian African Americans, efforts to support quitting across racial/ethnic groups, especially marginalized groups, need to be prioritized.
本研究比较了美国和加利福尼亚州(加州)的非裔美国人(AA)、亚洲/太平洋岛民(API)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔(H/L)、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)的烟草使用和戒烟情况,加州是美国拥有持续资金支持时间最长的烟草控制项目的州。本研究的目的是确定不同种族/族裔群体在不同时间的烟草使用差异。
通过 1992-2019 年《当前人口调查》中的烟草使用补充调查,计算了各调查年份的香烟使用率(吸用率和当前使用率)、消费量(平均每天吸烟量 [CPD])和戒烟率,并在每个种族/族裔群体内进行了趋势检查,并比较了加州和美国之间的差异。
所有种族/族裔群体的使用率都有所下降。与美国的同类人群相比,加州的 NHW 人群的当前使用率显著下降,而美国的 H/L 人群的下降幅度大于加州的同类人群。CPD 下降了约 30%,不同种族/族裔群体的 CPD 数量有所下降,其中加州的降幅最大。在加州,AA 的降幅最大(1992/1993 年的平均 10.3 CPD[95%置信区间(CI):10.3,12.6]降至 2018/2019 年的 3 CPD[95% CI:2.4,3.7])。从 1992/1993 年到 2018/2019 年,加州 H/L 的戒烟率从 52.4%(95% CI:49.8,53.0)上升到 59.3%(95% CI:55.8,62.5),加州 NHW 的戒烟率从 61.5%(95% CI:60.7,61.9)上升到 63.8%(95% CI:63.9,66.9)。
尽管每个种族/族裔群体的总体流行率随时间呈下降趋势,但 CA 的下降速度超过了美国,仅在 NHW 中如此。CPD 的减少令人鼓舞,但戒烟率表明需要加强烟草控制工作,以促进戒烟。
加州和美国其他地区的吸烟率和流行率在一段时间内都有所下降,这在很大程度上是由于非西班牙裔白人人口的减少。尽管每天吸烟量的减少是一个显著的成功,特别是在加利福尼亚的非裔美国人中,但需要优先考虑支持不同种族/族裔群体,特别是边缘化群体戒烟的努力。