• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版脑卒中环境量表(MOSE):脑卒中幸存者的心理测量评估。

A Chinese version of the Measure of Stroke Environment (MOSE): psychometric evaluation in stroke survivors.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2879-2888. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1843720. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1843720
PMID:33202159
Abstract

PURPOSE

To translate the MOSE from English to Chinese and investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese-translated version of the Measure of Stroke Environment (MOSE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MOSE was translated into Chinese using a cultural adaptation process. To validate this Chinese version, 311 stroke survivors were recruited to complete the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the MOSE were evaluated by determining item analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, construct validity, and floor/ceiling effects, respectively.

RESULTS

The MOSE was translated without any major difficulties. Regarding psychometric performances, a moderate level of correlation between the items and the domains ( > 0.4), and the significant differences in items between the high group and the low group were tested by independent sample -tests ( < 0.05). The test-retest reliability was excellent (Intraclass Coefficient Correlation = 0.938). Very high internal consistency was also observed (Cronbach's  = 0.945, split-half reliability = 0.778). An acceptable I-CVI ranged from 0.714 to 1.000 and a high S-CVI of 0.973. Correlations with the subscales of the WHODAS 2.0 were significant in similar domains reflecting good convergent validity. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study provides psychometric evidence supporting the use of the Chinese version of the MOSE among stroke survivors.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Measure of Stroke Environment was translated into Chinese through a rigorous cultural adaptation process.MOSE-C is now a reliable and valid tool for Chinese-speaking survivors who have suffered from a stroke.It is necessary to assess the perceived environmental barriers of stroke survivors and develop targeted intervention programs in China.

摘要

目的

将 MOSE 从英文翻译成中文,并研究中文翻译版《中风环境量表》(MOSE)的心理测量学特性。

材料和方法

使用文化适应过程将 MOSE 翻译成中文。为了验证这个中文版本,我们招募了 311 名中风幸存者来完成问卷。通过确定项目分析、重测信度、内部一致性、内容效度、结构效度和地板/天花板效应,分别评估 MOSE 的心理测量学特性。

结果

MOSE 的翻译没有遇到任何重大困难。在心理测量性能方面,通过独立样本 t 检验(p < 0.05),项目与领域之间存在中度相关性(> 0.4),高分组和低分组之间的项目存在显著差异。重测信度极好(组内相关系数 = 0.938)。还观察到非常高的内部一致性(Cronbach's = 0.945,分半信度 = 0.778)。可接受的 I-CVI 范围为 0.714 至 1.000,S-CVI 为 0.973。与 WHODAS 2.0 子量表的相关性在相似的领域中具有显著意义,反映了良好的收敛效度。没有地板或天花板效应。

结论

本研究提供了心理测量学证据,支持中风幸存者使用中文版 MOSE。

对康复的意义

通过严格的文化适应过程,将《中风环境量表》翻译成中文。

MOSE-C 现在是一种可靠且有效的工具,适用于讲中文、曾中风的幸存者。

在中国,有必要评估中风幸存者感知到的环境障碍,并制定有针对性的干预计划。

相似文献

1
A Chinese version of the Measure of Stroke Environment (MOSE): psychometric evaluation in stroke survivors.中文版脑卒中环境量表(MOSE):脑卒中幸存者的心理测量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2879-2888. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1843720. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
A Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self Efficacy Scale (PS-SES): psychometric evaluation in stroke survivors.参与策略自我效能感量表(PS-SES)的中文版本:中风幸存者的心理计量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4500-4508. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1907796. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Measure of Stroke Environment (MOSE) in stroke survivors in Sub-Saharan Africa.《卒中环境评估量表(MOSE)》法语版在撒哈拉以南非洲卒中幸存者中的跨文化适应与验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 May;47(10):2668-2675. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2396549. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
4
A Chinese version of the young children's participation and environment measure: psychometric evaluation in a Hong Kong sample.《儿童参与及环境量表中文版》:在香港样本中的心理计量学评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Oct;43(21):3061-3069. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1727032. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth.《儿童和青少年参与及环境测量表中文版的编制与心理计量学评估》
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jul;42(15):2204-2214. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1553210. Epub 2019 May 12.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the functional assessment scale for acute hamstring injuries (FASH) questionnaire for French-speaking patients.功能性腘绳肌损伤评估量表(FASH)问卷的跨文化调适、翻译和验证,适用于讲法语的患者。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jul;42(14):2076-2082. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1544669. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Work-Ability Support Scale (WSS) in Young and Middle-Aged Stroke Survivors.中文版本的工作能力支持量表(WSS)在中青年脑卒中幸存者中的跨文化调适与验证。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Dec;30(4):646-655. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09878-y.
8
Validation of a translated Chinese version of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale: a cross-sectional study.参与策略自我效能量表中文版的验证:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5277-5283. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1933220. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
9
Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.日本骨科学会颈椎病脊髓病评估问卷简体中文版:颈椎病脊髓病患者的跨文化调适、信度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1516-1523. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1822931. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Evaluating Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation.中文译文:脊柱肿瘤不稳评分在评估转移性脊柱肿瘤患者中的应用:跨文化调适与验证。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1630-1637. doi: 10.1111/os.13363. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.