Department of Math and Sciences, Laramie County Community College, Cheyenne, WY 82007.
Department of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Dec;19(4):es13. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-05-0090.
Biology research is becoming increasingly dependent on large-scale, "big data," networked research initiatives. At the same time, there has been a corresponding effort to expand undergraduate participation in research to benefit student learning and persistence in science. This essay examines the confluence of this trend through eight years of a collaboration within a successful biology research network that explicitly incorporates undergraduates into large-scale scientific research. We draw upon interviews with faculty in this network to consider the interplay of scientific and pedagogical objectives at the heart of this undergraduate-focused network research project. We identify ways that this network has expanded and diversified access to scientific knowledge production for faculty and students and examine a goal conflict that emerged around the dual objectives of mentoring emerging scientists while producing high-quality scientific data for the larger biology community. Based on lessons learned within this network, we provide three recommendations that can support institutions and faculty engaging in networked research projects with undergraduates: (1) establish rigorous protocols to ensure data and database quality, (2) protect personnel time to coordinate network and scientific processes, and (3) select appropriate partners and establish explicit expectations for specific collaborations.
生物学研究越来越依赖于大规模的“大数据”网络研究计划。与此同时,人们也在努力扩大本科生参与研究的范围,以促进学生的学习和对科学的坚持。本文通过对一个成功的生物学研究网络中八年的合作进行考察,探讨了这一趋势的融合,该网络明确将本科生纳入到大规模的科学研究中。我们通过对该网络中的教师进行访谈,考虑了以本科生为重点的网络研究项目核心的科学和教学目标之间的相互作用。我们确定了该网络在扩大和多样化教师和学生获取科学知识方面的途径,并研究了在培养新兴科学家和为更大的生物学界提供高质量科学数据这两个目标之间出现的目标冲突。基于该网络中的经验教训,我们提供了三条建议,可为从事有本科生参与的网络研究项目的机构和教师提供支持:(1)建立严格的协议,确保数据和数据库的质量;(2)保护人员时间,以协调网络和科学进程;(3)选择合适的合作伙伴,并为特定合作建立明确的期望。