Suppr超能文献

基于古代和现代全基因组数据推断的青藏高原人类定居历史及藏族的多次混合事件

Peopling History of the Tibetan Plateau and Multiple Waves of Admixture of Tibetans Inferred From Both Ancient and Modern Genome-Wide Data.

作者信息

He Guanglin, Wang Mengge, Zou Xing, Chen Pengyu, Wang Zheng, Liu Yan, Yao Hongbin, Wei Lan-Hai, Tang Renkuan, Wang Chuan-Chao, Yeh Hui-Yuan

机构信息

School of Humanities, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2021 Sep 3;12:725243. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.725243. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Archeologically attested human occupation on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) can be traced back to 160 thousand years ago (kya) via the archaic Xiahe people and 30∼40 kya via the Nwya Devu anatomically modern human. However, the history of the Tibetan populations and their migration inferred from the ancient and modern DNA remains unclear. Here, we performed the first ancient and modern genomic meta-analysis among 3,017 Paleolithic to present-day Eastern Eurasian genomes (2,444 modern individuals from 183 populations and 573 ancient individuals). We identified a close genetic connection between the ancient-modern highland Tibetans and lowland island/coastal Neolithic Northern East Asians (NEA). This observed genetic affinity reflected the primary ancestry of high-altitude Tibeto-Burman speakers originated from the Neolithic farming populations in the Yellow River Basin. The identified pattern was consistent with the proposed common north-China origin hypothesis of the Sino-Tibetan languages and dispersal patterns of the northern millet farmers. We also observed the genetic differentiation between the highlanders and lowland NEAs. The former harbored more deeply diverged Hoabinhian/Onge-related ancestry and the latter possessed more Neolithic southern East Asian (SEA) or Siberian-related ancestry. Our reconstructed and h models suggested the co-existence of Paleolithic and Neolithic ancestries in the Neolithic to modern East Asian highlanders. Additionally, we found that Tibetans from Ü-Tsang/Ando/Kham regions showed a strong population stratification consistent with their cultural background and geographic terrain. Ü-Tsang Tibetans possessed a stronger Chokhopani-affinity, Ando Tibetans had more Western Eurasian related ancestry and Kham Tibetans harbored greater Neolithic southern EA ancestry. Generally, ancient and modern genomes documented multiple waves of human migrations in the TP's past. The first layer of local hunter-gatherers mixed with incoming millet farmers and arose the Chokhopani-associated Proto-Tibetan-Burman highlanders, which further respectively mixed with additional genetic contributors from the western Eurasian Steppe, Yellow River and Yangtze River and finally gave rise to the modern Ando, Ü-Tsang and Kham Tibetans.

摘要

考古证实,人类在青藏高原的居住历史可追溯至16万年前的古老夏河人,以及3万至4万年前的尼阿底解剖学意义上的现代人。然而,从古代和现代DNA推断出的藏族人口历史及其迁徙情况仍不明确。在此,我们对3017个旧石器时代至今的东亚大陆基因组(来自183个群体的2444个现代个体和573个古代个体)进行了首次古代和现代基因组元分析。我们发现古代和现代的高原藏族与低地岛屿/沿海新石器时代东亚北部人群(NEA)之间存在密切的基因联系。这种观察到的基因亲和力反映了说藏缅语的高海拔人群的主要祖先源自黄河流域的新石器时代农耕人群。所确定的模式与汉藏语系共同的华北起源假说以及北方粟作农民的扩散模式一致。我们还观察到高原人群与低地东亚北部人群之间的基因分化。前者拥有更为古老分化的和平文化/昂格相关血统,后者拥有更多新石器时代东亚南部(SEA)或西伯利亚相关血统。我们重建的模型表明,在新石器时代至现代的东亚高地人群中,旧石器时代和新石器时代的血统并存。此外,我们发现,来自卫藏/安多/康区的藏族表现出与他们的文化背景和地理地形一致的强烈群体分层。卫藏藏族具有更强的乔霍帕尼亲和力,安多藏族有更多与西方欧亚相关的血统,康区藏族拥有更多新石器时代东亚南部血统。总体而言,古代和现代基因组记录了青藏高原过去多波人类迁徙。当地的第一批狩猎采集者与迁入的粟作农民混合,产生了与乔霍帕尼相关的原始藏缅高地人群,后者又分别与来自欧亚草原西部、黄河和长江的其他基因贡献者进一步混合,最终形成了现代的安多、卫藏和康区藏族。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/8506211/bf8f9bed61ff/fgene-12-725243-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验