Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA), Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.
Section 4, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 22;17(22):8675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228675.
The purpose of the present study was to validate the short version of The Psychosocial Safety Climate questionnaire (PSC-4, Dollard, 2019) and to establish benchmarks indicating risk levels for use in Sweden. Cross-sectional data from (1) a random sample of employees in Sweden aged 25-65 years ( = 2847) and (2) a convenience sample of non-managerial employees from 94 workplaces ( = 3066) were analyzed. Benchmarks for three PSC risk levels were developed using organizational compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) regulations as criterion. The results support the validity and usefulness of the Swedish PSC-4 as an instrument to indicate good, fair, and poor OSH practices. The recommended benchmark for indicating good OSH practices is an average score of >12.0, while the proposed cutoff for poor OSH practices is a score of ≤8.0 on the PSC-4. Scores between these benchmarks indicate fair OSH practices. Furthermore, aggregated data on PSC-4 supported its reliability as a workplace level construct and its association with quantitative demands, quality of leadership, commitment to the workplace, work engagement, job satisfaction, as well as stress and burnout. Thus, the Swedish version of PSC-4 can be regarded as a valid and reliable measure for both research and practical use for risk assessment at workplaces.
本研究的目的是验证心理社会安全气候问卷(PSC-4,Dollard,2019 年)的简短版本,并建立风险水平基准,以便在瑞典使用。使用组织对职业安全与健康(OSH)法规的遵守情况作为标准,分析了(1)瑞典 25-65 岁随机员工样本(n=2847)和(2)94 个工作场所非管理员工的便利样本(n=3066)的横断面数据。开发了三个 PSC 风险水平的基准,以支持瑞典 PSC-4 作为一个工具来表示良好、公平和较差的 OSH 实践。建议的用于表示良好 OSH 实践的基准是平均得分>12.0,而建议的用于表示较差 OSH 实践的截止值是 PSC-4 上的得分≤8.0。得分在这些基准之间表示公平的 OSH 实践。此外,PSC-4 的汇总数据支持其作为工作场所水平结构的可靠性及其与定量需求、领导质量、对工作场所的承诺、工作投入、工作满意度以及压力和倦怠的相关性。因此,PSC-4 的瑞典版本可被视为用于工作场所风险评估的研究和实际用途的有效且可靠的测量工具。