Thorpe Roland J, Cobb Ryon, King Keyonna, Bruce Marino A, Archibald Paul, Jones Harlan P, Norris Keith C, Whitfield Keith E, Hudson Darrell
Program for Research on Men's Health, Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Sociology, University of Georgia, Athens.
Innov Aging. 2020 Sep 29;4(5):igaa047. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa047. eCollection 2020.
Among the multiple factors posited to drive the health inequities that black men experience, the fundamental role of stress in the production of poor health is a key component. Allostatic load (AL) is considered to be a byproduct of stressors related to cumulative disadvantage. Exposure to chronic stress is associated with poorer mental health including depressive symptoms. Few studies have investigated how AL contributes to depressive symptoms among black men. The purpose of the cross-sectional study was to examine the association between AL and depressive symptoms among middle- to old age black men.
This project used the 2010 and 2012 wave of the Health and Retirement Study enhanced face-to-face interview that included a biomarker assessment and psychosocial questionnaire. Depressive symptoms, assessed by the endorsement of 3 or more symptoms on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression 8-item scale, was the outcome variable. The main independent variable, AL, score was calculated by summing the number values that were in the high range for that particular biomarker value scores ranging from 0 to 7. black men whose AL score was 3 or greater were considered to be in the high AL group. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
There was a larger proportion of black men in the high AL group who reported depressive symptoms (30.0% vs. 20.0%) compared with black men in the low AL group. After adjusting for age, education, income, drinking, and smoking status, the prevalence of reporting 3 or more depressive symptoms was statistically significant among black men in the high AL group (PR = 1.61 [95% CI: 1.20-2.17]) than black men in the low AL group.
Exposure to chronic stress is related to reporting 3 or more depressive symptoms among black men after controlling for potential confounders. Improving the social and economic conditions for which black men work, play, and pray is key to reducing stress, thereby potentially leading to the reporting of fewer depressive symptoms.
在诸多被认为导致黑人男性健康不平等的因素中,压力在健康状况不佳产生过程中的根本作用是一个关键因素。应激负荷(AL)被认为是与累积劣势相关的应激源的副产品。长期暴露于压力与包括抑郁症状在内的较差心理健康状况有关。很少有研究调查应激负荷如何导致黑人男性出现抑郁症状。这项横断面研究的目的是检验中老年黑人男性中应激负荷与抑郁症状之间的关联。
本项目使用了2010年和2012年健康与退休研究增强面对面访谈,其中包括生物标志物评估和心理社会问卷。通过在流行病学研究中心抑郁8项量表上认可3种或更多症状来评估抑郁症状,这是结果变量。主要自变量应激负荷得分是通过将特定生物标志物值得分范围为0至7中的高值数值相加计算得出。应激负荷得分3分或更高的黑人男性被认为属于高应激负荷组。采用修正泊松回归来估计患病率比(PRs)和相应的95%置信区间(CIs)。
与低应激负荷组的黑人男性相比,高应激负荷组中报告有抑郁症状的黑人男性比例更高(30.0%对20.0%)。在调整年龄、教育程度、收入、饮酒和吸烟状况后,高应激负荷组的黑人男性报告3种或更多抑郁症状的患病率在统计学上显著高于低应激负荷组的黑人男性(PR = 1.61 [95% CI:1.20 - 2.17])。
在控制潜在混杂因素后,长期暴露于压力与黑人男性报告3种或更多抑郁症状有关。改善黑人男性工作、娱乐和祈祷的社会经济条件是减轻压力的关键,从而可能减少抑郁症状的报告。