Mo Ning, Zhang Xiaoyu, Shi Wenjun, Yu Gongwang, Chen Xiaoshu, Yang Jian-Rong
Department of Medical Genetics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 May 4;38(5):1874-1887. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa332.
Negative genetic regulators of phenotypic heterogeneity, or phenotypic capacitors/stabilizers, elevate population average fitness by limiting deviation from the optimal phenotype and increase the efficacy of natural selection by enhancing the phenotypic differences among genotypes. Stabilizers can presumably be switched off to release phenotypic heterogeneity in the face of extreme or fluctuating environments to ensure population survival. This task could, however, also be achieved by positive genetic regulators of phenotypic heterogeneity, or "phenotypic diversifiers," as shown by recently reported evidence that a bacterial divisome factor enhances antibiotic resistance. We hypothesized that such active creation of phenotypic heterogeneity by diversifiers, which is functionally independent of stabilizers, is more common than previously recognized. Using morphological phenotypic data from 4,718 single-gene knockout strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we systematically identified 324 stabilizers and 160 diversifiers and constructed a bipartite network between these genes and the morphological traits they control. Further analyses showed that, compared with stabilizers, diversifiers tended to be weaker and more promiscuous (regulating more traits) regulators targeting traits unrelated to fitness. Moreover, there is a general division of labor between stabilizers and diversifiers. Finally, by incorporating NCI-60 human cancer cell line anticancer drug screening data, we found that human one-to-one orthologs of yeast diversifiers/stabilizers likely regulate the anticancer drug resistance of human cancer cell lines, suggesting that these orthologs are potential targets for auxiliary treatments. Our study therefore highlights stabilizers and diversifiers as the genetic regulators for the bidirectional control of phenotypic heterogeneity as well as their distinct evolutionary roles and functional independence.
表型异质性的负向遗传调控因子,即表型缓冲器/稳定剂,通过限制与最优表型的偏差来提高群体平均适应性,并通过增强基因型之间的表型差异来提高自然选择的效力。在面对极端或波动的环境时,缓冲器可能会被关闭以释放表型异质性,从而确保群体生存。然而,正如最近报道的证据所示,细菌分裂体因子增强抗生素抗性,表型异质性的正向遗传调控因子,即“表型多样化因子”,也可以实现这一任务。我们假设,多样化因子对表型异质性的这种主动创造在功能上独立于缓冲器,比之前认为的更为常见。利用酿酒酵母4718个单基因敲除菌株的形态表型数据,我们系统地鉴定出324个缓冲器和160个多样化因子,并构建了这些基因与其所控制的形态性状之间的二分网络。进一步分析表明,与缓冲器相比,多样化因子往往是较弱且更为混杂(调控更多性状)的调控因子,其靶向的性状与适应性无关。此外,缓冲器和多样化因子之间存在普遍的分工。最后,通过纳入NCI - 60人类癌细胞系抗癌药物筛选数据,我们发现酵母多样化因子/缓冲器的人类直系同源物可能调控人类癌细胞系的抗癌药物抗性,这表明这些直系同源物是辅助治疗的潜在靶点。因此,我们的研究强调了缓冲器和多样化因子作为表型异质性双向控制的遗传调控因子,以及它们独特的进化作用和功能独立性。