• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习支持的决策分析预测 90 天急性心力衰竭再入院和死亡。

Predicting 90 day acute heart failure readmission and death using machine learning-supported decision analysis.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):230-237. doi: 10.1002/clc.23532. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1002/clc.23532
PMID:33355945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7852168/
Abstract

Readmission or death soon after heart failure (HF) admission is a significant problem. Traditional analyses for predicting such events often fail to consider the gamut of characteristics that may contribute- tending to focus on 30-day outcomes even though the window of increased vulnerability may last up to 90 days. Risk assessments incorporating machine learning (ML) methods may be better suited than traditional statistical analyses alone to sort through multitude of data in the electronic health record (EHR) and identify patients at higher risk. HYPOTHESIS: ML-based decision analysis may better identify patients at increased risk for 90-day acute HF readmission or death after incident HF admission. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 3189 patients who underwent index HF hospitalization, 15.2% experienced primary or acute HF readmission and 11.5% died within 90 days. For risk assessment models, 98 variables were considered across nine data categories. ML techniques were used to help select variables for a final logistic regression (LR) model. The final model's AUC was 0.760 (95% CI 0.752 to 0.767), with sensitivity of 83%. This proved superior to an LR model alone [AUC 0.744 (95% CI 0.732 to 0.755)]. Eighteen variables were identified as risk factors including dilated inferior vena cava, elevated blood pressure, elevated BUN, reduced albumin, abnormal sodium or bicarbonate, and NT pro-BNP elevation. A risk prediction ML-based model developed from comprehensive characteristics within the EHR can efficiently identify patients at elevated risk of 90-day acute HF readmission or death for whom closer follow-up or further interventions may be considered.

摘要

心力衰竭(HF)入院后不久再次入院或死亡是一个重大问题。传统的预测此类事件的分析方法往往没有考虑到可能导致这种情况的各种特征,往往侧重于 30 天的结果,尽管易损期可能长达 90 天。纳入机器学习(ML)方法的风险评估可能比传统的统计分析更适合于梳理电子健康记录(EHR)中的大量数据并识别风险较高的患者。假设:基于 ML 的决策分析可能更好地识别出在 HF 入院后 90 天内发生急性 HF 再入院或死亡风险增加的患者。方法和结果:在 3189 名接受指数 HF 住院治疗的患者中,15.2%经历了原发性或急性 HF 再入院,11.5%在 90 天内死亡。对于风险评估模型,考虑了九个数据类别中的 98 个变量。使用 ML 技术来帮助选择最终逻辑回归(LR)模型的变量。最终模型的 AUC 为 0.760(95%CI 0.752 至 0.767),灵敏度为 83%。这优于单独的 LR 模型[AUC 0.744(95%CI 0.732 至 0.755)]。确定了 18 个风险因素,包括扩张的下腔静脉、血压升高、BUN 升高、白蛋白减少、钠或碳酸氢盐异常以及 NT pro-BNP 升高。从 EHR 中的综合特征开发的风险预测 ML 模型可以有效地识别出 90 天内发生急性 HF 再入院或死亡风险较高的患者,这些患者可能需要更密切的随访或进一步的干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/e584029e355d/CLC-44-230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/26ab3ebcdffe/CLC-44-230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/8592f71e1134/CLC-44-230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/3ccbeafbf37a/CLC-44-230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/e584029e355d/CLC-44-230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/26ab3ebcdffe/CLC-44-230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/8592f71e1134/CLC-44-230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/3ccbeafbf37a/CLC-44-230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/7852168/e584029e355d/CLC-44-230-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting 90 day acute heart failure readmission and death using machine learning-supported decision analysis.使用机器学习支持的决策分析预测 90 天急性心力衰竭再入院和死亡。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):230-237. doi: 10.1002/clc.23532. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
The Price of Explainability in Machine Learning Models for 100-Day Readmission Prediction in Heart Failure: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.机器学习模型在心力衰竭 100 天再入院预测中的可解释性代价:回顾性、比较性、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 27;25:e46934. doi: 10.2196/46934.
4
Feature selection and transformation by machine learning reduce variable numbers and improve prediction for heart failure readmission or death.机器学习的特征选择和转换减少了变量数量,并提高了心力衰竭再入院或死亡的预测准确性。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218760. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Hospital Readmissions and Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Modeling Study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者再入院及心力衰竭恶化事件预测的机器学习算法比较:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:e41775. doi: 10.2196/41775.
6
Predicting Risk of 30-Day Readmissions Using Two Emerging Machine Learning Methods.使用两种新兴机器学习方法预测30天再入院风险。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;250:250-255.
7
Comparison of hand-carried ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for predicting readmission after hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure.手持超声评估下腔静脉与N末端脑钠肽前体对急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院后再入院预测的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Sep;1(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.06.005.
8
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions.心力衰竭再入院的机器学习技术分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality.用于预测心力衰竭再入院和死亡率的机器学习与传统统计模型对比
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):106-115. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13073. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
Comparison of prognostic significance of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic Peptide versus blood urea nitrogen for predicting events in patients hospitalized for heart failure.氨基末端脑钠肽前体与血尿素氮对预测心力衰竭住院患者事件的预后意义比较
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 15;99(8):1143-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.050. Epub 2007 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Adaptive Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Severity of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.用于预测射血分数降低的心力衰竭严重程度的时间自适应机器学习模型
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;15(6):715. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060715.
2
Predictive Analytics in Heart Failure Risk, Readmission, and Mortality Prediction: A Review.心力衰竭风险、再入院和死亡率预测中的预测分析:综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 17;16(11):e73876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73876. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network for Improved Cardiac Image Classification in Heart Disease Diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Transitions of Care Pharmacist Services and Identification of Risk Predictors in Heart Failure Readmission.过渡护理药师服务对心力衰竭再入院的影响及风险预测指标的识别。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Aug;34(4):567-572. doi: 10.1177/0897190019884173. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Electronic medical record-based model to predict the risk of 90-day readmission for patients with heart failure.基于电子病历的心力衰竭患者 90 天再入院风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0915-8.
3
Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques to Forecast Patient Prognosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
用于改善心脏病诊断中心脏图像分类的深度卷积生成对抗网络
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01343-z.
4
Machine Learning For Risk Prediction After Heart Failure Emergency Department Visit or Hospital Admission Using Administrative Health Data.利用行政健康数据进行心力衰竭急诊科就诊或住院后风险预测的机器学习
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 25;3(10):e0000636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000636. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Hospital Heart Failure Medical Therapy Score and Associated Clinical Outcomes and Costs.医院心力衰竭药物治疗评分及其相关临床结局和成本。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Nov 1;9(11):1029-1038. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2969.
6
Explainable machine learning for predicting 30-day readmission in acute heart failure patients.用于预测急性心力衰竭患者30天再入院情况的可解释机器学习
iScience. 2024 Jun 15;27(7):110281. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110281. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
7
Interpretable Machine Learning Models Using Peripheral Immune Cells to Predict 90-Day Readmission or Mortality in Acute Heart Failure Patients.使用外周免疫细胞预测急性心力衰竭患者 90 天再入院或死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241259784. doi: 10.1177/10760296241259784.
8
A machine learning model to predict heart failure readmission: toward optimal feature set.一种预测心力衰竭再入院的机器学习模型:迈向最优特征集
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Feb 21;7:1363226. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1363226. eCollection 2024.
9
Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients.基于机器学习的心力衰竭患者再入院和死亡率预测。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45925-3.
10
Predicting unplanned readmission due to cardiovascular disease in hospitalized patients with cancer: a machine learning approach.预测因癌症住院患者因心血管疾病而再次入院:一种机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40552-4.
利用机器学习技术预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的患者预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
6
Impact of non-cardiovascular disease burden on thirty-day hospital readmission in heart failure patients.非心血管疾病负担对心力衰竭患者30天再入院的影响。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(6):691-700. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0147.
7
Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure.心力衰竭的全球公共卫生负担。
Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2.
8
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions.心力衰竭再入院的机器学习技术分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Comparison of Machine Learning and Other Statistical Approaches.预测因心力衰竭住院患者的 30 天全因再入院率:机器学习与其他统计学方法的比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):204-209. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3956.
10
Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.超声心动图评估左心室舒张功能的建议:美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像学会的更新
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;17(12):1321-1360. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew082. Epub 2016 Jul 15.